Ford Sierra Cosworth fuel injectors?
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Ford Sierra Cosworth fuel injectors?
Has anyone used aftermarket Sierra Cosworth injectors? I am chasing down a stumbling problem in my car and I want to eliminate the fuel injectors as a problem. My injectors were redone by Witch Hunter about 2k miles and 3 years ago. I just did a lot of re wiring and got a stumbling problem. I want to eliminate the possibility that I damaged an injectors during the wiring process (manifold came off). I was going to send the injectors back out, or take them to a place here, but if i can get new injectors to test for the same price...Anyway the Sierra uses the same injectors as the 951 and there are some people making them. They seem to have an updated 4 nozzle tip, but seem the same otherwise. Anyone have experience with them? Is the 4 nozzle better?
Thanks for your thoughts
Thanks for your thoughts
#2
4 nozzle injectors are always better. But I wouldn't change OEM injectors for 4 nozzles injectors, when running a stock DME.
I'm running Volvo injectors in my 944, but with VEMS. 4 hole. This means better fuel atomization, so better cold start, idle, part throttle behaviour, fuel economy and driveability. With the 4 hole injectors I could reduce VEMS start, afterstart and warmup enrichment settings significantly.
https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...l#post16285387
I'm running Volvo injectors in my 944, but with VEMS. 4 hole. This means better fuel atomization, so better cold start, idle, part throttle behaviour, fuel economy and driveability. With the 4 hole injectors I could reduce VEMS start, afterstart and warmup enrichment settings significantly.
https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...l#post16285387
Last edited by H.F.B.; 10-15-2023 at 01:44 PM.
#3
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
But I wouldn't change OEM injectors for 4 nozzles injectors, when running a stock DME.
I'm running Volvo injectors in my 944, but with VEMS. 4 hole. This means better fuel atomization, so better cold start, idle, part throttle behaviour, fuel economy and driveability. With the 4 hole injectors I could reduce VEMS start, afterstart and warmup enrichment settings significantly.
I'm running Volvo injectors in my 944, but with VEMS. 4 hole. This means better fuel atomization, so better cold start, idle, part throttle behaviour, fuel economy and driveability. With the 4 hole injectors I could reduce VEMS start, afterstart and warmup enrichment settings significantly.
Fuel injection is one of the biggest disappointments in the auto industry I have learned about.
Am I the only person to consider aftermarket injectors (stock, not higher flow) for a turbo? There are also aftermarket one hole injectors, would these be a better bet?
#4
#5
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Formerly the DPRK, now seeking political asylum in Oregon
Posts: 1,152
Received 581 Likes
on
349 Posts
Not to stray too far off topic, but IMO, electronic fuel injection is the best thing to happen to internal combustion ever. 2nd best thing is electronic spark control...
Carburetors and distributors are simpler, but fall short in sooooo many ways.
Back to the real topic...
I can see how an injector with the same flow rate but better atomization would provide more burnable fuel and cause a rich condition. Hard for me to imagine it would be enough to require a retune, but maybe.
Flow rate isn't the only measurement of an injector. Different injectors have different response times from off to on. Dunno if that will be a factor, but it might show up at light load operation.
Last one is injector quality. Lots of crap on the market these days. If it's not a name brand (Bosch, Delphi, etc...) and from a reputable vendor, I'd walk away.
Last thing you need are injectors that don't all flow the same rate. 1 cylinder running too lean, others a little rich: Looks good on the AFR monitor, but burned piston under load.
Carburetors and distributors are simpler, but fall short in sooooo many ways.
Back to the real topic...
I can see how an injector with the same flow rate but better atomization would provide more burnable fuel and cause a rich condition. Hard for me to imagine it would be enough to require a retune, but maybe.
Flow rate isn't the only measurement of an injector. Different injectors have different response times from off to on. Dunno if that will be a factor, but it might show up at light load operation.
Last one is injector quality. Lots of crap on the market these days. If it's not a name brand (Bosch, Delphi, etc...) and from a reputable vendor, I'd walk away.
Last thing you need are injectors that don't all flow the same rate. 1 cylinder running too lean, others a little rich: Looks good on the AFR monitor, but burned piston under load.
#6
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Last one is injector quality. Lots of crap on the market these days. If it's not a name brand (Bosch, Delphi, etc...) and from a reputable vendor, I'd walk away.
Not to stray too far off topic, but IMO, electronic fuel injection is the best thing to happen to internal combustion ever.
I had a Starion ESIR that embodied everything wrong with FI. I forget, but it had one or two injectors at the throttle body continuously injecting fuel. Barley a step up from a carb. Actually it could be a step down because I had to replace the injector twice because of severe fire inducing leaks. I say "could" because even though I LOVED this car (who does not like box flares!) it was a complete POS so if it did have carbs they probably would have gone bad too!
The following users liked this post:
Nowanker (10-18-2023)