Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Cannot Adjust Idle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2019, 04:26 PM
  #46  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Oops, didn't mean to stir a pot by mistake. I was responding to Droops' post 37. His post was thoughtful and logical, as he always is, but suggested the issue was the result of a "scaling issue" with the MAF and/or difficulties finding a well-suited MAF. While that's a logical possibility in theory, and I've seen it first hand with lesser systems, I was just vouching for the basic design of the VR system -- i.e., mapping and MAF selection as designed. My apologies if I came on too strong. Other than that, I wasn't trying to disagree with anyone or put words in anyone's mouth, and don't disagree with you on your points above.
I didn't think of you as a pot stirrer. No worries.
I don't believe people here with issues want to revert back to stock and diagnose a situation where there are enough VR systems out there that someone experiencing the same symptoms and rectified them can help. Returning a product is easy. If tech support isn't available why would anybody purchase to begin with?
Old 08-27-2019, 10:23 PM
  #47  
bradthebold
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
bradthebold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am trying to measure the MAF signal voltage, but I'm not doing something right. DME and MAF are unplugged, car to on position. Measuring pin 7 on the DME, I get 0.318V. When I measure the MAF signal voltage on the MAF connector (the blue wire on my connector), I only get 0.005V. Measuring the red wire at the MAF connector gives me 12V.

When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.

No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V

Last edited by bradthebold; 08-27-2019 at 11:08 PM.
Old 08-28-2019, 01:02 AM
  #48  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,665
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fast951
Comparing the Vitesse MAF to others is a waste of time. We have been offering true MAF conversion since 2003. Very aware of the MAF transfer function and how it works.
With over 1000 units sold for both street and track, we have the software and hardware as close to perfect as you would hope.

We work with customers to resolve issues. 95% of the time it's something not related but affects our components. Of course relying on the customers to be our eyes and ears is time consuming as most of the time we have to bring them up to speed.

A MAP based system has its own shortcomings. Any system without proper support is useless unless you are an expert and do not need support.
Hi John,

I have been around this forum for a long time, and I know that you have a great reputation, and I see that you are active in supporting your customers. My earlier post was not meant to disparage your product in any way, but was more to point out a general issue with MAF systems on high-boost engines (which of course you could educate me and many others here about till the cows come home).

I hear you about offering remote support, which is why I don't diagnose my customers' issues over the phone! I try to help out fellow 951 owners on this forum because I am enthusiastic about these cars and know that the current owners of them tend to be regular working-class folks such as myself (though some of the prices that pristine low-mileage 951s have fetched of late have given me pause!).

The problem is compounded by the fact that for practical reasons systems such as a Vitesse MAF system or VEMS engine management system tend to get installed during the course of numerous other jobs such as the installation of a larger turbo, injectors, intake reseal, or even a full engine rebuild, which leaves a lot of scope for vacuum leaks or other unintended issues outside the system. Even if this is not the case, typical 30+ year old 951 issues can rear their head and be blamed on the new hardware or software. Therefore, I do not envy this particular role of John@ Vitesse or Peep who makes the VEMS Porsche kits!

After seeing the latest posts of the logs and John's and Tom's additional insight, I would have to agree that a vacuum leak at idle is the most likely cause. Brad, I know you have done a number of high-pressure boost leak tests, which are great for sniffing out boost leaks at full boost pressure, but a vacuum leak affects the seal in question in a different manner, and they also tend to be worse when the engine is cold. This is where a smoke machine comes in handy----they usually only operate at a few PSI if that. The old fashioned brake/carb cleaner test while running also works, but is somewhat crude. If the issue bothers you enough, it might be worth paying a shop a bit of labor time to smoke test the system with everything intact.
Old 08-28-2019, 02:03 AM
  #49  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bradthebold
I am trying to measure the MAF signal voltage, but I'm not doing something right. DME and MAF are unplugged, car to on position. Measuring pin 7 on the DME, I get 0.318V. When I measure the MAF signal voltage on the MAF connector (the blue wire on my connector), I only get 0.005V. Measuring the red wire at the MAF connector gives me 12V.

When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.

No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V
Your piggyback will show the exact voltage from the MAF, and the exact voltage sent to pin 7 after any modifications by the piggyback. Why not just look there? If you are not using the piggyback and need to check with a multimeter, you need to keep the MAF and DME connected and tap into pin 7 of the DME with the car running at idle. Unplugging the DME and MAF and checking with the engine off won't give you any useful information. The MAF produces a voltage proportional to the amount of air consumed when the motor is running and it's that voltage you want to check. So turning off the motor and disconnecting the MAF and DME will prevent your car from producing the very signal you are looking to check. Make sense?
Old 08-28-2019, 02:20 AM
  #50  
bradthebold
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
bradthebold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, if I can check with the PB, that is easier. Granted, I still need to check on the MAF side. Yes, it makes a lot more sense to measure while it's connected and running, but how to I measure it when it's connected?

And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
Old 08-28-2019, 02:22 AM
  #51  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Droops83
Hi John,

I have been around this forum for a long time, and I know that you have a great reputation, and I see that you are active in supporting your customers. My earlier post was not meant to disparage your product in any way, but was more to point out a general issue with MAF systems on high-boost engines (which of course you could educate me and many others here about till the cows come home).

I hear you about offering remote support, which is why I don't diagnose my customers' issues over the phone! I try to help out fellow 951 owners on this forum because I am enthusiastic about these cars and know that the current owners of them tend to be regular working-class folks such as myself (though some of the prices that pristine low-mileage 951s have fetched of late have given me pause!).

The problem is compounded by the fact that for practical reasons systems such as a Vitesse MAF system or VEMS engine management system tend to get installed during the course of numerous other jobs such as the installation of a larger turbo, injectors, intake reseal, or even a full engine rebuild, which leaves a lot of scope for vacuum leaks or other unintended issues outside the system. Even if this is not the case, typical 30+ year old 951 issues can rear their head and be blamed on the new hardware or software. Therefore, I do not envy this particular role of John@ Vitesse or Peep who makes the VEMS Porsche kits!

After seeing the latest posts of the logs and John's and Tom's additional insight, I would have to agree that a vacuum leak at idle is the most likely cause. Brad, I know you have done a number of high-pressure boost leak tests, which are great for sniffing out boost leaks at full boost pressure, but a vacuum leak affects the seal in question in a different manner, and they also tend to be worse when the engine is cold. This is where a smoke machine comes in handy----they usually only operate at a few PSI if that. The old fashioned brake/carb cleaner test while running also works, but is somewhat crude. If the issue bothers you enough, it might be worth paying a shop a bit of labor time to smoke test the system with everything intact.

Great post by a great, long-time rennlister. I guess we all have our reasons for wanting to help. When I was in high school, there was no internet. If I wanted my very beat-up Bondo-mobile to get me to school the next day, all I had was an old Chilton's manual standing between me and a 4 mile walk. And the Chilton's manual covered every car built over like a decade, so my car was lucky to get 10-15 pages of actual diagnostic info. I walked a lot. I would have given anything to have a forum like this to ask questions and get such thoughtful/informed answers like this. I think more than anything that's why I always try to help if I can.
The following users liked this post:
Droops83 (08-28-2019)
Old 08-28-2019, 02:29 AM
  #52  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bradthebold
Ok, if I can check with the PB, that is easier. Granted, I still need to check on the MAF side. Yes, it makes a lot more sense to measure while it's connected and running, but how to I measure it when it's connected?

And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
The piggyback shows you the voltage IN (straight off the MAF) and the voltage OUT (after any changes made by the piggyback). If you have it up and running, there's really nothing else needed to check the MAF and pin 7 voltages. I picked up this smoke tester when working on an old Mercedes and can say it works very well. Smoking mineral spirits isn't the nicest smell, but it works well. Everything on the old Mercedes is vacuum actuated, so count yourself lucky that at least you aren't looking for vacuum leaks in the door panels and trunk!

Amazon Amazon
Old 08-28-2019, 08:40 AM
  #53  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Speaking about Vacuum leaks has anyone ever used one of these product? I'm thinking about buying one as this seems to be a good idea concerning diagnosing issues such as the idle....my car was doing something similar prior to pulling the engine.

https://redlinedetection.com/
Old 08-28-2019, 05:18 PM
  #54  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,665
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gruhsy
Speaking about Vacuum leaks has anyone ever used one of these product? I'm thinking about buying one as this seems to be a good idea concerning diagnosing issues such as the idle....my car was doing something similar prior to pulling the engine.

https://redlinedetection.com/
Those appear to be professional-grade smoke detectors, which are great but expensive. We have a couple at my shop (not that particular brand), one is 1-3 PSI for evaporative emission system leak detection, and one is ~5 PSI and can find some boost leaks as well as vacuum leaks. They come in really handy and we use them a lot, but they are probably outside of the reach of the budget DIY enthusiast.

I have seen some interesting posts in the past about DIYers using rental party smoke machines and even cigarette smoke, but I don't think I would condone either of these, just throwing it out there.
Old 08-28-2019, 05:32 PM
  #55  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

My experience is that vacuum leaks raise an idle and not lower it on a 951 in most cases. So we may or may not be searching for the same thing.
Old 08-28-2019, 05:42 PM
  #56  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
My experience is that vacuum leaks raise an idle and not lower it on a 951 in most cases. So we may or may not be searching for the same thing.
Hmmm... fair point. There may be multiple things going on, and the recently changed transistors on the DME introduce their own question mark. I'd really want to know what the voltage is on pin 7, and see what happens when you increase and decrease it via the piggyback.
Old 08-28-2019, 05:58 PM
  #57  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Hmmm... fair point. There may be multiple things going on, and the recently changed transistors on the DME introduce their own question mark. I'd really want to know what the voltage is on pin 7, and see what happens when you increase and decrease it via the piggyback.
The cut transistor is not an issue. I recently had a good long discussion with Joe from ftech9 after purchasing his dme. Its Irrelevant.
Old 08-28-2019, 06:02 PM
  #58  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
The cut transistor is not an issue. I recently had a good long discussion with Joe from ftech9 after purchasing his dme. Its Irrelevant.
No, I meant the OP's attempt to change the ISV driver circuit components. Hard to know if that helped or hurt... I think you are referring to the resistor that gets cut to hook up the MAF?
Old 08-28-2019, 06:03 PM
  #59  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
No, I meant the OP's attempt to change the ISV driver circuit components. Hard to know if that helped or hurt... I think you are referring to the resistor that gets cut to hook up the MAF?
Ah, yes. Communication error on my part.
Old 08-28-2019, 06:10 PM
  #60  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Well I was thinking maybe a higher voltage coil may help . So i ordered a 6 ohm 45k coil . May as well throw some money at the problem. if the fuel isn't atomizing properly this may help. If not than the maf is next in line.


Quick Reply: Cannot Adjust Idle



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:34 AM.