Cannot Adjust Idle
#46
Banned
Oops, didn't mean to stir a pot by mistake. I was responding to Droops' post 37. His post was thoughtful and logical, as he always is, but suggested the issue was the result of a "scaling issue" with the MAF and/or difficulties finding a well-suited MAF. While that's a logical possibility in theory, and I've seen it first hand with lesser systems, I was just vouching for the basic design of the VR system -- i.e., mapping and MAF selection as designed. My apologies if I came on too strong. Other than that, I wasn't trying to disagree with anyone or put words in anyone's mouth, and don't disagree with you on your points above.
I don't believe people here with issues want to revert back to stock and diagnose a situation where there are enough VR systems out there that someone experiencing the same symptoms and rectified them can help. Returning a product is easy. If tech support isn't available why would anybody purchase to begin with?
#47
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am trying to measure the MAF signal voltage, but I'm not doing something right. DME and MAF are unplugged, car to on position. Measuring pin 7 on the DME, I get 0.318V. When I measure the MAF signal voltage on the MAF connector (the blue wire on my connector), I only get 0.005V. Measuring the red wire at the MAF connector gives me 12V.
When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.
No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V
When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.
No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V
Last edited by bradthebold; 08-27-2019 at 11:08 PM.
#48
Three Wheelin'
Comparing the Vitesse MAF to others is a waste of time. We have been offering true MAF conversion since 2003. Very aware of the MAF transfer function and how it works.
With over 1000 units sold for both street and track, we have the software and hardware as close to perfect as you would hope.
We work with customers to resolve issues. 95% of the time it's something not related but affects our components. Of course relying on the customers to be our eyes and ears is time consuming as most of the time we have to bring them up to speed.
A MAP based system has its own shortcomings. Any system without proper support is useless unless you are an expert and do not need support.
With over 1000 units sold for both street and track, we have the software and hardware as close to perfect as you would hope.
We work with customers to resolve issues. 95% of the time it's something not related but affects our components. Of course relying on the customers to be our eyes and ears is time consuming as most of the time we have to bring them up to speed.
A MAP based system has its own shortcomings. Any system without proper support is useless unless you are an expert and do not need support.
I have been around this forum for a long time, and I know that you have a great reputation, and I see that you are active in supporting your customers. My earlier post was not meant to disparage your product in any way, but was more to point out a general issue with MAF systems on high-boost engines (which of course you could educate me and many others here about till the cows come home).
I hear you about offering remote support, which is why I don't diagnose my customers' issues over the phone! I try to help out fellow 951 owners on this forum because I am enthusiastic about these cars and know that the current owners of them tend to be regular working-class folks such as myself (though some of the prices that pristine low-mileage 951s have fetched of late have given me pause!).
The problem is compounded by the fact that for practical reasons systems such as a Vitesse MAF system or VEMS engine management system tend to get installed during the course of numerous other jobs such as the installation of a larger turbo, injectors, intake reseal, or even a full engine rebuild, which leaves a lot of scope for vacuum leaks or other unintended issues outside the system. Even if this is not the case, typical 30+ year old 951 issues can rear their head and be blamed on the new hardware or software. Therefore, I do not envy this particular role of John@ Vitesse or Peep who makes the VEMS Porsche kits!
After seeing the latest posts of the logs and John's and Tom's additional insight, I would have to agree that a vacuum leak at idle is the most likely cause. Brad, I know you have done a number of high-pressure boost leak tests, which are great for sniffing out boost leaks at full boost pressure, but a vacuum leak affects the seal in question in a different manner, and they also tend to be worse when the engine is cold. This is where a smoke machine comes in handy----they usually only operate at a few PSI if that. The old fashioned brake/carb cleaner test while running also works, but is somewhat crude. If the issue bothers you enough, it might be worth paying a shop a bit of labor time to smoke test the system with everything intact.
#49
Rennlist Member
I am trying to measure the MAF signal voltage, but I'm not doing something right. DME and MAF are unplugged, car to on position. Measuring pin 7 on the DME, I get 0.318V. When I measure the MAF signal voltage on the MAF connector (the blue wire on my connector), I only get 0.005V. Measuring the red wire at the MAF connector gives me 12V.
When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.
No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V
When I unplug the piggyback and put in the shorting plug, both connectors showed 0.003V.
No shorting plug, the MAF was 0.001V and the analog #1 in at the PB was 0.001V
#50
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, if I can check with the PB, that is easier. Granted, I still need to check on the MAF side. Yes, it makes a lot more sense to measure while it's connected and running, but how to I measure it when it's connected?
And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
#51
Rennlist Member
Hi John,
I have been around this forum for a long time, and I know that you have a great reputation, and I see that you are active in supporting your customers. My earlier post was not meant to disparage your product in any way, but was more to point out a general issue with MAF systems on high-boost engines (which of course you could educate me and many others here about till the cows come home).
I hear you about offering remote support, which is why I don't diagnose my customers' issues over the phone! I try to help out fellow 951 owners on this forum because I am enthusiastic about these cars and know that the current owners of them tend to be regular working-class folks such as myself (though some of the prices that pristine low-mileage 951s have fetched of late have given me pause!).
The problem is compounded by the fact that for practical reasons systems such as a Vitesse MAF system or VEMS engine management system tend to get installed during the course of numerous other jobs such as the installation of a larger turbo, injectors, intake reseal, or even a full engine rebuild, which leaves a lot of scope for vacuum leaks or other unintended issues outside the system. Even if this is not the case, typical 30+ year old 951 issues can rear their head and be blamed on the new hardware or software. Therefore, I do not envy this particular role of John@ Vitesse or Peep who makes the VEMS Porsche kits!
After seeing the latest posts of the logs and John's and Tom's additional insight, I would have to agree that a vacuum leak at idle is the most likely cause. Brad, I know you have done a number of high-pressure boost leak tests, which are great for sniffing out boost leaks at full boost pressure, but a vacuum leak affects the seal in question in a different manner, and they also tend to be worse when the engine is cold. This is where a smoke machine comes in handy----they usually only operate at a few PSI if that. The old fashioned brake/carb cleaner test while running also works, but is somewhat crude. If the issue bothers you enough, it might be worth paying a shop a bit of labor time to smoke test the system with everything intact.
I have been around this forum for a long time, and I know that you have a great reputation, and I see that you are active in supporting your customers. My earlier post was not meant to disparage your product in any way, but was more to point out a general issue with MAF systems on high-boost engines (which of course you could educate me and many others here about till the cows come home).
I hear you about offering remote support, which is why I don't diagnose my customers' issues over the phone! I try to help out fellow 951 owners on this forum because I am enthusiastic about these cars and know that the current owners of them tend to be regular working-class folks such as myself (though some of the prices that pristine low-mileage 951s have fetched of late have given me pause!).
The problem is compounded by the fact that for practical reasons systems such as a Vitesse MAF system or VEMS engine management system tend to get installed during the course of numerous other jobs such as the installation of a larger turbo, injectors, intake reseal, or even a full engine rebuild, which leaves a lot of scope for vacuum leaks or other unintended issues outside the system. Even if this is not the case, typical 30+ year old 951 issues can rear their head and be blamed on the new hardware or software. Therefore, I do not envy this particular role of John@ Vitesse or Peep who makes the VEMS Porsche kits!
After seeing the latest posts of the logs and John's and Tom's additional insight, I would have to agree that a vacuum leak at idle is the most likely cause. Brad, I know you have done a number of high-pressure boost leak tests, which are great for sniffing out boost leaks at full boost pressure, but a vacuum leak affects the seal in question in a different manner, and they also tend to be worse when the engine is cold. This is where a smoke machine comes in handy----they usually only operate at a few PSI if that. The old fashioned brake/carb cleaner test while running also works, but is somewhat crude. If the issue bothers you enough, it might be worth paying a shop a bit of labor time to smoke test the system with everything intact.
Great post by a great, long-time rennlister. I guess we all have our reasons for wanting to help. When I was in high school, there was no internet. If I wanted my very beat-up Bondo-mobile to get me to school the next day, all I had was an old Chilton's manual standing between me and a 4 mile walk. And the Chilton's manual covered every car built over like a decade, so my car was lucky to get 10-15 pages of actual diagnostic info. I walked a lot. I would have given anything to have a forum like this to ask questions and get such thoughtful/informed answers like this. I think more than anything that's why I always try to help if I can.
The following users liked this post:
Droops83 (08-28-2019)
#52
Rennlist Member
Ok, if I can check with the PB, that is easier. Granted, I still need to check on the MAF side. Yes, it makes a lot more sense to measure while it's connected and running, but how to I measure it when it's connected?
And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
And I will probably get a cheap smoke machine and test through the intake first and least and see if I can find some leak somewhere.
#53
Speaking about Vacuum leaks has anyone ever used one of these product? I'm thinking about buying one as this seems to be a good idea concerning diagnosing issues such as the idle....my car was doing something similar prior to pulling the engine.
https://redlinedetection.com/
https://redlinedetection.com/
#54
Three Wheelin'
Speaking about Vacuum leaks has anyone ever used one of these product? I'm thinking about buying one as this seems to be a good idea concerning diagnosing issues such as the idle....my car was doing something similar prior to pulling the engine.
https://redlinedetection.com/
https://redlinedetection.com/
I have seen some interesting posts in the past about DIYers using rental party smoke machines and even cigarette smoke, but I don't think I would condone either of these, just throwing it out there.
#56
Rennlist Member
Hmmm... fair point. There may be multiple things going on, and the recently changed transistors on the DME introduce their own question mark. I'd really want to know what the voltage is on pin 7, and see what happens when you increase and decrease it via the piggyback.
#57
Banned
Hmmm... fair point. There may be multiple things going on, and the recently changed transistors on the DME introduce their own question mark. I'd really want to know what the voltage is on pin 7, and see what happens when you increase and decrease it via the piggyback.
#58
Rennlist Member
No, I meant the OP's attempt to change the ISV driver circuit components. Hard to know if that helped or hurt... I think you are referring to the resistor that gets cut to hook up the MAF?
#59
Banned
#60
Banned
Well I was thinking maybe a higher voltage coil may help . So i ordered a 6 ohm 45k coil . May as well throw some money at the problem. if the fuel isn't atomizing properly this may help. If not than the maf is next in line.