How much timing advance can I add to my 84 L-jet supercharged
#16
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I just got back in the office - was at a HDPE event with my son at Mid-Ohio.
Advancing your ignition timing on a boosted 928 is a BIG risk. As he maker of your kit, I cannot recommend it. We do leave your ignition advance at the stock setting and "get away with it" largely because of the lower compression ratio your L-Jet motor has. We also instruct you to run premium fuel (91 OCT or better) since the day it became supercharged.
But I certainly would not advance the timing. No. Don' do it. The first symptom we see as a sign of detonation is the blown head gaskets. However, frequently undiagnosed is the fact that the pistons in those cylinders will have broken ring lands.
Unless you have a fresh engine in your garage that you are itching to install, leave the ignition timing on your 16v L-Jet alone.
Advancing your ignition timing on a boosted 928 is a BIG risk. As he maker of your kit, I cannot recommend it. We do leave your ignition advance at the stock setting and "get away with it" largely because of the lower compression ratio your L-Jet motor has. We also instruct you to run premium fuel (91 OCT or better) since the day it became supercharged.
But I certainly would not advance the timing. No. Don' do it. The first symptom we see as a sign of detonation is the blown head gaskets. However, frequently undiagnosed is the fact that the pistons in those cylinders will have broken ring lands.
Unless you have a fresh engine in your garage that you are itching to install, leave the ignition timing on your 16v L-Jet alone.
I have taken advance out of the car and run at the low end of stock (4 degrees at idle and 18 degrees at 3000 RPM w/o vacuum advance).
I do run 93 octane, and I am intercooled, also. Most important I am running in the rich range on both cylinder banks AFR's = 12-14, and that seems to have eliminated my off idle stumble.
I think I knew that timing was dangerous with boost, but forgot. Thanks to you guys for protecting me before I did any damage.
Dave
Last edited by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net; 07-30-2017 at 12:17 PM.
#17
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks again to everyone.
I would like to ask again how much timing advance should I be running on my 84 L-jet SC? The answers that I have received so far are essentially stock or less. Let me summarize what stock is for my vacuum advance only distributor: (per WSM 28:29)
without vacuum advance: 4-8 degrees at idle, 20 degrees at 3000RPM, 24-28 degrees at 5000RPM.
14-17 degrees of vacuum advance at 400 mbar vacuum.
Is this really what I should be running? Should I retard it? How do you come up with a correct answer?
Thanks again in advance.
Dave
I would like to ask again how much timing advance should I be running on my 84 L-jet SC? The answers that I have received so far are essentially stock or less. Let me summarize what stock is for my vacuum advance only distributor: (per WSM 28:29)
without vacuum advance: 4-8 degrees at idle, 20 degrees at 3000RPM, 24-28 degrees at 5000RPM.
14-17 degrees of vacuum advance at 400 mbar vacuum.
Is this really what I should be running? Should I retard it? How do you come up with a correct answer?
Thanks again in advance.
Dave
#18
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
You first need to know what maximum safe timing was without the supercharger.
Once that is set you tune the engine to pull back timing under boost. The old rule of thumb is one degree per pound of boost.
How do you do that? With your distributor you can't, at least I'm not aware of it working.
As I stated above (or one of your other threads) you need an 80-82 distributor with a vacuum retard port As luck would have it, removing the vacuum port (or adding a check valve to allow pressure out and still make vacuum as stock) will retard timing under boost.
How much does it retard? I never got around to measuring timing on my car before scrapping the whole system. From memory it was estimated to be a bit over 1 degree per pound of boost. I never had any issues with 17psi of boost with this configuration but I was never happy with the arrangement.
There are other piggy-back devices that go between your ignition brain and distributor to pull back timing under boost. I never played with any of those and I've heard mixed results from those who did.
Once that is set you tune the engine to pull back timing under boost. The old rule of thumb is one degree per pound of boost.
How do you do that? With your distributor you can't, at least I'm not aware of it working.
As I stated above (or one of your other threads) you need an 80-82 distributor with a vacuum retard port As luck would have it, removing the vacuum port (or adding a check valve to allow pressure out and still make vacuum as stock) will retard timing under boost.
How much does it retard? I never got around to measuring timing on my car before scrapping the whole system. From memory it was estimated to be a bit over 1 degree per pound of boost. I never had any issues with 17psi of boost with this configuration but I was never happy with the arrangement.
There are other piggy-back devices that go between your ignition brain and distributor to pull back timing under boost. I never played with any of those and I've heard mixed results from those who did.
#19
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks, Erik. If I may ask, how does a vacuum retard actuator retard the spark under boost. It sounds like a great idea, but I'm just not catching on to how it works. For now i have retarded my distributor about 4 degrees across the board from the stock setting, but that is not ideal for all conditions.
Thanks again,
Dave
Thanks again,
Dave
Last edited by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net; 07-27-2017 at 10:58 PM.
#20
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
The dist with advance & retard ports move the arm in both directions depending on which port is generating vacuum drop.
If you leave it hooked up stock, both ports will see boost and nothing changes. If you disconnect the line going to the retard port, now when the advance port sees boost, it pushes the arm in the retard direction.
I used a check valve on the retard port so that side would still see vacuum as stock, but still allow the boost to bleed off and retard the timing.
If you leave it hooked up stock, both ports will see boost and nothing changes. If you disconnect the line going to the retard port, now when the advance port sees boost, it pushes the arm in the retard direction.
I used a check valve on the retard port so that side would still see vacuum as stock, but still allow the boost to bleed off and retard the timing.
#21
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
The dist with advance & retard ports move the arm in both directions depending on which port is generating vacuum drop.
If you leave it hooked up stock, both ports will see boost and nothing changes. If you disconnect the line going to the retard port, now when the advance port sees boost, it pushes the arm in the retard direction.
I used a check valve on the retard port so that side would still see vacuum as stock, but still allow the boost to bleed off and retard the timing.
If you leave it hooked up stock, both ports will see boost and nothing changes. If you disconnect the line going to the retard port, now when the advance port sees boost, it pushes the arm in the retard direction.
I used a check valve on the retard port so that side would still see vacuum as stock, but still allow the boost to bleed off and retard the timing.
Thanks,
Dave
#22
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
No idea, as stated above I never got around to measuring it. By the time I added a stock timing ring and crank sensor, I decided to scrap L-Jet.
It's a "better than nothing" setup. If you really want to delve into fine tuning your car, time to ditch L-Jet and get something you have complete control over.
I've had a few moments of insanity of re-installing the "stock" setup on my 80 just to see what I can do with it.
It's a "better than nothing" setup. If you really want to delve into fine tuning your car, time to ditch L-Jet and get something you have complete control over.
I've had a few moments of insanity of re-installing the "stock" setup on my 80 just to see what I can do with it.
#23
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks again, Erik. I will give it some more thought. I see a used 80-82 distributor for $100-200.
BTW I'm planning to max out my boost at only 8 PSI. Your 17 PSI must have been scary.
Dave
BTW I'm planning to max out my boost at only 8 PSI. Your 17 PSI must have been scary.
Dave
Last edited by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net; 07-27-2017 at 10:59 PM.
#24
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
The thing is, I have no idea what happens to the advance "arm" in the 83/84 dist under boost. Maybe it pushes the arm back to "neutral" but again, just a big guessing game.
The theory is since the earlier unit is designed to retard timing past "neutral" you can pull out more timing with them under boost.....
You'll most likely take out more than necessary but with such a crude setup, that's not really a bad thing.
The theory is since the earlier unit is designed to retard timing past "neutral" you can pull out more timing with them under boost.....
You'll most likely take out more than necessary but with such a crude setup, that's not really a bad thing.
#25
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
The thing is, I have no idea what happens to the advance "arm" in the 83/84 dist under boost. Maybe it pushes the arm back to "neutral" but again, just a big guessing game.
The theory is since the earlier unit is designed to retard timing past "neutral" you can pull out more timing with them under boost.....
You'll most likely take out more than necessary but with such a crude setup, that's not really a bad thing.
The theory is since the earlier unit is designed to retard timing past "neutral" you can pull out more timing with them under boost.....
You'll most likely take out more than necessary but with such a crude setup, that's not really a bad thing.
thanks,
Dave
Last edited by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net; 07-27-2017 at 10:59 PM.
#26
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I'm having flashbacks of testing these things. I seem to recall we did confirm that applying pressure to the advance side (with nothing on the retard side) lowered timing - confirmed by engine rpm, test done at idle.
Jeez.... that was all 15+ years ago
Jeez.... that was all 15+ years ago
#27
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
It is interesting how your memory works. You probably haven't thought about this in years, but it's still in your head.
Thanks,
Dave
#28
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
To jog my memory, I stick my tongue in here:
#29
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I ordered an 82 distributor. I really like your method because instead of pulling out 4-5 degrees of timing across the board , this will retard only under boost where I need it. Losing timing at low throttle robs the car of pep around town. I'll let you know how it goes.
Thanks,
Dave
Thanks,
Dave
#30
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Something else I mentioned above.
There was some debate a LONG time ago about the merits of vacuum retard. Porsche stopped using it in 83 and capped off that port on the TB, but nobody really knows (or shared) other possible differences with the various distributors.
Point is this: If you want that 82 dist to work as stock, you will need a vacuum valve on that port so the retard side will still see vacuum but allow boost to bleed off which will create a pressure drop across the diaphragm and retard timing.
Something like the valve next to the brake booster, same thing.
Also need to dig up the 80-82 WSM photo of the TB connection ports to use. I'm 98% sure all the TB's are the same, they just put a cap on the port which goes to the retard side. The holes which feed these ports are very close together inside the TB itself..... it seems Porsche wanted the timing to vary with any kind of vacuum differential between these ports with that distributor.
There was some debate a LONG time ago about the merits of vacuum retard. Porsche stopped using it in 83 and capped off that port on the TB, but nobody really knows (or shared) other possible differences with the various distributors.
Point is this: If you want that 82 dist to work as stock, you will need a vacuum valve on that port so the retard side will still see vacuum but allow boost to bleed off which will create a pressure drop across the diaphragm and retard timing.
Something like the valve next to the brake booster, same thing.
Also need to dig up the 80-82 WSM photo of the TB connection ports to use. I'm 98% sure all the TB's are the same, they just put a cap on the port which goes to the retard side. The holes which feed these ports are very close together inside the TB itself..... it seems Porsche wanted the timing to vary with any kind of vacuum differential between these ports with that distributor.