Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.
|
Originally Posted by James Bailey
(Post 13095691)
Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.
|
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 13095667)
And the really great part....I don't feel like I've missed a single thing!
you too Sean! you guys are SO juvenile:bigbye:! |
Originally Posted by Mongo
(Post 13095091)
If it's functional, screw looks. We aren't dating supermodels now are we.
Looks great and built for speed my friend!! :) |
Originally Posted by GlenL
(Post 13095703)
I think the Polder 210201-30 will be faster.
|
Originally Posted by James Bailey
(Post 13095421)
Conspiracy theory is they did not want to upstage the 911 Turbo.. :) or want Kibort to actually WIN races.
however, there is more to go with the intake and you know it. Im not talkng makinig a balloon out of tin foil and calling it an intake, but a little thought or bastardizing something that actualy is in production might be a good bet. after all if anderson and fan can put that stuff on their engine and have it give 100hp with no tuning, there is room for more, dont you think, over the stock intake ON a 5 liter. again, when i talk, i could care less about anything under 4000rpm, post shift 4500rpm and redlining near 6600rpm. that narrow window opens lots of options |
Originally Posted by James Bailey
(Post 13095691)
Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.
|
Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....
With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :) I googled some images to use as samples. Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again. http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg And another great picture cutaway of tapering. http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner. Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you. |
Originally Posted by Mongo
(Post 13095855)
Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....
With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :) I googled some images to use as samples. Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again. http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg And another great picture cutaway of tapering. http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner. Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you. |
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 13095618)
It's really funny reading this thread when two of them are blocked. I can't imagine the pain some of you are going through.
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 13095667)
And the really great part....I don't feel like I've missed a single thing!
|
Often wondered where the term " it is toast " came from when referring to a blown up engine but I think I am seeing the connection. It is not like someone sent me a letter explaining it....
Been looking at vuvuzelas as a low cost velocity stack option... the solution is out there !! |
Originally Posted by Dave928S
(Post 13096022)
I'm pain free too, and yet it still has perfect continuity :) I'm really enjoying Jims thinking 'outside the box' to arrive at affordable and practical solutions. Keep up that lateral thinking :thumbup:
the bottom line, im here to learn or find new ways to improve on the 928 platform. |
Just a thought, I wonder what Todd's manifold would do without the turbos pumping through it ?
It strikes me as the kind of thing I'd be looking at if I were building a NA manifold. Hacker ? |
Originally Posted by mark kibort
(Post 13096223)
I dont need to get credit for anything here, but I'm glad our interactions and information started to get folks thinking..
Originally Posted by Roy928tt
(Post 13097358)
Hacker ?
It won't be petty and the hood won't close, but it could be done. Not that I've given this any thought or anything...... :icon107: |
Originally Posted by Mongo
(Post 13095855)
Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....
With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :) I googled some images to use as samples. Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again. http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg And another great picture cutaway of tapering. http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner. Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:47 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands