Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums

Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums (https://rennlist.com/forums/)
-   928 Forum (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum-69/)
-   -   Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/922127-gain-100hp-with-an-intake-manifold-change-cross-post-from-ferrari-chat.html)

James Bailey 03-10-2016 05:16 PM

Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.

GlenL 03-10-2016 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by James Bailey (Post 13095691)
Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.

I think the Polder 210201-30 will be faster.

mark kibort 03-10-2016 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 13095667)
And the really great part....I don't feel like I've missed a single thing!

as they always say Greg.... Ignorance is Bliss! enjoy your little corner with blindfolds on.

you too Sean!

you guys are SO juvenile:bigbye:!

mark kibort 03-10-2016 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by Mongo (Post 13095091)
If it's functional, screw looks. We aren't dating supermodels now are we.

I am! :)

Looks great and built for speed my friend!! :)

James Bailey 03-10-2016 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by GlenL (Post 13095703)
I think the Polder 210201-30 will be faster.

Ha, Ha just a play on the red is faster but I still prefer the more stock look of polished metal..

mark kibort 03-10-2016 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by James Bailey (Post 13095421)
Conspiracy theory is they did not want to upstage the 911 Turbo.. :) or want Kibort to actually WIN races.

i made mine as dirty as you would want, aside from "fine" tuning.. i think 335rwhp off a 5 liter was respectable. thats 320 going to about 400 with only removing smog stuff and making it run a little fatter and less restrictive. so we agree here too.
however, there is more to go with the intake and you know it. Im not talkng makinig a balloon out of tin foil and calling it an intake, but a little thought or bastardizing something that actualy is in production might be a good bet.

after all if anderson and fan can put that stuff on their engine and have it give 100hp with no tuning, there is room for more, dont you think, over the stock intake ON a 5 liter. again, when i talk, i could care less about anything under 4000rpm, post shift 4500rpm and redlining near 6600rpm.
that narrow window opens lots of options

Mongo 03-10-2016 05:46 PM


Originally Posted by James Bailey (Post 13095691)
Did locate an alternative stainless sheet metal plenum ... Polder 216204 should fit better in the V but might transfer too much heat.... again not plug and play.

At least my bread will be crispy. :p

Mongo 03-10-2016 06:04 PM

Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....

With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :)

I googled some images to use as samples.

Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again.

http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg


And another great picture cutaway of tapering.

http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg



Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner.

Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you.

mark kibort 03-10-2016 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by Mongo (Post 13095855)
Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....

With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :)

I googled some images to use as samples.

Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again.

http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg


And another great picture cutaway of tapering.

http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg



Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner.

Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you.

those look good!

Dave928S 03-10-2016 06:52 PM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 13095618)
It's really funny reading this thread when two of them are blocked. I can't imagine the pain some of you are going through.


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 13095667)
And the really great part....I don't feel like I've missed a single thing!

I'm pain free too, and yet it still has perfect continuity :) I'm really enjoying Jims thinking 'outside the box' to arrive at affordable and practical solutions. Keep up that lateral thinking :thumbup:

James Bailey 03-10-2016 06:59 PM

Often wondered where the term " it is toast " came from when referring to a blown up engine but I think I am seeing the connection. It is not like someone sent me a letter explaining it....
Been looking at vuvuzelas as a low cost velocity stack option... the solution is out there !!

mark kibort 03-10-2016 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by Dave928S (Post 13096022)
I'm pain free too, and yet it still has perfect continuity :) I'm really enjoying Jims thinking 'outside the box' to arrive at affordable and practical solutions. Keep up that lateral thinking :thumbup:

I dont need to get credit for anything here, but I'm glad our interactions and information started to get folks thinking.. regardless if sean or greg knew what i was saying, its all discussion and talk. i dont know why they have to act like 3rd graders and be so proud to push someone out of their "group". real mature. It's ok, Jim and i still banter back and forth and i suspect things i say get him thinking, as seen by his responses.
the bottom line, im here to learn or find new ways to improve on the 928 platform.

Roy928tt 03-11-2016 06:10 AM

Just a thought, I wonder what Todd's manifold would do without the turbos pumping through it ?

It strikes me as the kind of thing I'd be looking at if I were building a NA manifold.

Hacker ?

hacker-pschorr 03-11-2016 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by mark kibort (Post 13096223)
I dont need to get credit for anything here, but I'm glad our interactions and information started to get folks thinking..

Your arrogance has no limit, does it?


Originally Posted by Roy928tt (Post 13097358)
Hacker ?

Todd's intake is not a "bolt on" endeavor to a stock 928. If he ever takes his engine apart again, and I think I can sneak that intake away for a weekend......one could jimmy rig something just for a dyno test.
It won't be petty and the hood won't close, but it could be done.

Not that I've given this any thought or anything...... :icon107:

Imo000 03-11-2016 12:15 PM


Originally Posted by Mongo (Post 13095855)
Okay, time to tame the bearded lady and the midgets in this circus....

With regard to sheet metal intakes, still not a bad idea. :)

I googled some images to use as samples.

Below is an S2000 sheet metal. Take note of the tapered runners again.

http://www.motorgeek.com/albums/Olsonjus/s2000_4.jpg


And another great picture cutaway of tapering.

http://www.team-integra.net/images/B...Junplenum2.jpg



Diameter is important according to the book I am reading. The bottom taper must match the diameter of the cylinder head's intake port. Common sense of course. However, We run into diameter size at the velocity stack, or mouth. Objective of course is to funnel as much air in and at as fast of a velocity as we can (tapering helps this too), and with as long of a runner as required for the engine to exhibit gains in torque and power. This mathematical formula is what needs to be solved in order to get the desired length of runner.

Again, pointing to Greg's intake, his curved runners egressing from the large plenum have the perfect length to yield these gains. They appear to be significantly longer than the factory setup. As for diameter? Well that's Greg's secret and I am sure that he would have to kill you after telling you.

Paraphrasing a book is the ultimate mode of bench racing.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:47 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands