When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This weekend I replaced the rear wing on my car with one from the salvage yard. My rear wing was drilled for mounting a removable Gurney Flap. Which looks pretty cool with big P O R S C H E lettering across the back but sadly I am not brave enough to drive around town with that on the car, especially now that the roll bar has been removed.
Anyway, the replacement wing was from an early 87 model and has the flip up feature, which I didn't think I cared for. Upon mounting, I noticed what looked like an angle adjustment so one can raise or lower the trailing edge of the wing presumable to influence downforce, or possibly tidy up the looks when messing with front/rear ride height.
Am I correct with this? I didn't see any mention of this in the archives.
Here is a shot of the wing lifted. Left side of the photo is the rear of the car.
Benno
1988 928 S4 5spd
Last edited by Michael Benno; 09-13-2015 at 11:17 AM.
A wing generates a force in either direction, whether lift force (airplane) in the upwards direction, or down force (race car wing) in the downwards direction, relative to gravity.
A spoiler disrupts the airflow from laminar flow to turbulent flow. The turbulent air is better able to fill the void of negative relative pressure behind a vehicle that is generated at higher velocities. In other words it allows the air to bend behind the car to fill in the area of vacuum.
This void of negative relative pressure literally sucks the car back, which is another way of saying drag force. There is also a similar void of negative relative pressure above the rear hatch, but much, much smaller which causes a tiny amount of lift.
If you would like to form a more grounded understanding of vehicle aerodynamics, there is a great book by Hucho on this subject. ( Titled: Aerodynamics of road vehicles)
This weekend I replaced the rear wing on my car with one from the salvage yard. My rear wing was drilled for mounting a removable Gurney Flap. Which looks pretty cool with big P O R S C H E lettering across the back but sadly I am not brave enough to drive around town with that on the car, especially now that the roll bar has been removed.
Anyway, the replacement wing was from an early 87 model and has the flip up feature, which I didn't think I cared for. Upon mounting, I noticed what looked like an angle adjustment so one can raise or lower the trailing edge of the wing presumable to influence downforce, or possibly tidy up the looks when messing with front/rear ride height.
Am I correct with this? I didn't see any mention of this in the archives.
Here is a shot of the wing lifted. Left side of the photo is the rear of the car.
Benno
1988 928 S4 5spd
So upon further review and inspection of this mechanism, I can conclude that the adjustment on the rear wing latch mechanism does not impact the angle of the wing. In the down position the wing ALWAYS rests flush to the rear hatch.
Adjusting the position of the release block does not impact the wing angle. The adjustment of the release block impacts the gap between the the down rest position and the contact to the release block.
On inside of the wing there is a nub that acts in two ways. It catches on the release block on the down position to prevent lifting. The nub is rounded so excess force pushes the spring loaded block out of the way. In the up position the nub on the wing pushed the release block out of the way so it can be put in down and locked position.
any chance you can share the thread on the rattling? Would like to try to fix on my 87.
My comment came from experience - not a thread. Its pretty easy - if there's play in the wing, you can loosen the little screw on the back side (see above picture), and then the recangular block with the rounded edges can be moved down to remove slack, or up if the wing isn't quite catching and holding down, and hence rattles on the outside of the mechanism. The block has serrated teeth on the back side of it. Move it a couple of teeth in the desired direction, tighten the screw, and done
thanks! i took a quick look, and see what you mean, but i think i may attempt a different kind of fix. the black part of the wing had been rubbing on the paint already, making some nasty marks and low spots in it. maybe this is the source of the loosness? i plan on putting a piece of helicopter tape (the stuff clearmask uses for their clear paint protection film there. its the right thickness to take up the looseness, i already tested with some painters tape. hopefully that will protect the paint and keep the adjustment in the wing correct for the long term. will put a couple posts here once i get it done.
So upon further review and inspection of this mechanism, I can conclude that the adjustment on the rear wing latch mechanism does not impact the angle of the wing. In the down position the wing ALWAYS rests flush to the rear hatch.
Adjusting the position of the release block does not impact the wing angle. The adjustment of the release block impacts the gap between the the down rest position and the contact to the release block.
On inside of the wing there is a nub that acts in two ways. It catches on the release block on the down position to prevent lifting. The nub is rounded so excess force pushes the spring loaded block out of the way. In the up position the nub on the wing pushed the release block out of the way so it can be put in down and locked position.
You are missing the PP film that should go between the bracket and the hatch. That may stop your rubbing as the latch will be slightly raised from the surface of the hatch.