When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why can't the ride height be measured at the fender lip? Seems like a logical place to (dumb) me?
jc
Because fender placement is not relative to the mounting points of the suspension. While they will be close, the most accurate suspension geometry is kept by measuring how far the suspension is off the road, not the body panels. There can easily be 5-10mm difference.
Why can't the ride height be measured at the fender lip? Seems like a logical place to (dumb) me?
jc
It could for YOUR car once you know what the REAL measurements are, but outside of the nearby solid known suspension components, you introduce more and more slop the father out you get in measuring this...so it cant compare between two cars.
It can, but many fenders aren't what/where they used to be. When I first got the car, I adjusted the height to WSM spec height, and shared the fender lip heights with the group on what was the predecessor to RL. I should have known better, since folks would find that post with search and believe it was a standard way of measuring.
The suspension pick points are more reliable, but the WSM also assumes that the factory tire sizes will always be used, and that the tires are new. There's that 10mm allowance for tire wear, for instance, but folks are loathe to consider it as such. WSM heights and tolerances are there to guide a dealer tech, but give enough latitude so they aren't obligated to "do something" (read: warranty service) about a car that's a little higher or lower than another.
Ultimately, the "perfect" static height has the lower control arm level, with the tie rod at the same angle. This gives the least amount of camber and toe change with normal displacement/movement of the suspension. With new standard-height tires, the WSM settings give you this. Sag/wear allowance should probably not be used unless the tires are worn, keeping in mind that most Z-rated tires don't have 10mm of tread depth to give away.
I made a set of height gauges out of coat hanger wire (actually welding rod) that serves nicely. Stores easily in a 1qt Ziploc bag too, with a piece of corrugated tool holder and some masking tape to complete the kit.
Ultimately, the "perfect" static height has the lower control arm level, with the tie rod at the same angle.
What are these heights?
An interesting observation is that the factory heights don't give horizontal lower arms. I've always thought that was a good design goal for the reason you gave: least alignment variation in cornering and bumps.
The later WSM gives a procedure that removes tire size from setting the ride height and looks, correctly, at the difference between body height and knuckle height. In other words, don't set the fender height at all; set the angles of the suspension.
It can, but many fenders aren't what/where they used to be. When I first got the car, I adjusted the height to WSM spec height, and shared the fender lip heights with the group on what was the predecessor to RL. I should have known better, since folks would find that post with search and believe it was a standard way of measuring.
The suspension pick points are more reliable, but the WSM also assumes that the factory tire sizes will always be used, and that the tires are new. There's that 10mm allowance for tire wear, for instance, but folks are loathe to consider it as such. WSM heights and tolerances are there to guide a dealer tech, but give enough latitude so they aren't obligated to "do something" (read: warranty service) about a car that's a little higher or lower than another.
Ultimately, the "perfect" static height has the lower control arm level, with the tie rod at the same angle. This gives the least amount of camber and toe change with normal displacement/movement of the suspension. With new standard-height tires, the WSM settings give you this. Sag/wear allowance should probably not be used unless the tires are worn, keeping in mind that most Z-rated tires don't have 10mm of tread depth to give away.
I made a set of height gauges out of coat hanger wire (actually welding rod) that serves nicely. Stores easily in a 1qt Ziploc bag too, with a piece of corrugated tool holder and some masking tape to complete the kit.
Dr. Bob, that's a nifty way of doing it. Thanks for sharing as I believe I'm going to copy ya.
Sooo, with a known fender lip height=knuckle height on a particular car it should be close? I did have one piece of coat hanger wire that I cut to 175mm. But when I tried to fit it was a little too long. I will cut a few more. BTW, I was also thinking of plastic straws, seems like that might work, and if I'm under there measuring, I can start long and clip with diagonal snips to exact length then measure...
An interesting observation is that the factory heights don't give horizontal lower arms. I've always thought that was a good design goal for the reason you gave: least alignment variation in cornering and bumps.
The later WSM gives a procedure that removes tire size from setting the ride height and looks, correctly, at the difference between body height and knuckle height. In other words, don't set the fender height at all; set the angles of the suspension.
I guess I haven't seen that reference in the WSM. Mine only goes to 1994 updates. But that's the idea, looking at the angle of the arm, so that the axis of the lower control bushings is level with the pivot at the lower ball joint. That takes tire wear and different sizes out of the equation. For most the difference is moot though -- go with the floor to suspension pad dimension and you should be fine.
Originally Posted by SeanR
Dr. Bob, that's a nifty way of doing it. Thanks for sharing as I believe I'm going to copy ya.
Just send the checks to me, with the notation: "dr bob needs a new 991 twin-turbo", to get my fund going.
Originally Posted by Jchiodi
Sooo, with a known fender lip height=knuckle height on a particular car it should be close? I did have one piece of coat hanger wire that I cut to 175mm. But when I tried to fit it was a little too long. I will cut a few more. BTW, I was also thinking of plastic straws, seems like that might work, and if I'm under there measuring, I can start long and clip with diagonal snips to exact length then measure...
jc
Easier to cut a few to known lengths and use them as go/no-go gauges, with your target height gauge in the middle of your set of lengths.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.