Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rear Suspension Replacement Parts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2013, 05:05 PM
  #16  
Arnoud
Rennlist Member
 
Arnoud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 643
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Dave:

Although I do not have the springs that you have (I still have the factory standard springs on my car), IIRC the three tighter coils are indeed oriented toward the top of the assembly.

I posted several pictures a few weeks ago, including original spring measurements when in place of 31 cm, when we exchanged my standard rear shocks for Bilsteins, see: https://rennlist.com/forums/10459143-post30.html

Last edited by Arnoud; 05-24-2013 at 05:06 PM. Reason: Typo's
Old 05-24-2013, 06:12 PM
  #17  
FLYVMO
Rennlist Member
 
FLYVMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tucson,AZ
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Those springs look like the Eibach progressive springs, and they are shorter than the stock Porsche linear springs. Hopefully you have a set of 4 as otherwise your car will have a mix of progressive spring rates in the rear with linear in the front. Those springs also have a higher spring rate (stiffer) than stock.

Cheers!
Carl
Old 05-24-2013, 07:46 PM
  #18  
ammonman
Rennlist Member
 
ammonman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 2,246
Received 70 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

IIRC the orientation of the springs w/regard to the tighter coils doesn't matter. The "softer" section of the coils will compress before the "stiffer" section.

Mike
Old 05-24-2013, 08:59 PM
  #19  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,280
Received 54 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aaddpp
One question I have is on the spring length. I was surprised to see that the new springs were a bit shorter than the originals.
Looks like you've got the Eibach progressive ones.. they are indeed much shorter than stock.

Here's the eibachs next to stock S4 fronts and rears:
Attached Images   
Old 05-24-2013, 09:25 PM
  #20  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 356 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Am using Eibach on front, stock rear, handled great in autocross last weekend.
Old 05-25-2013, 01:59 AM
  #21  
aaddpp
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
aaddpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muriland
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arnoud
Dave:

Although I do not have the springs that you have (I still have the factory standard springs on my car), IIRC the three tighter coils are indeed oriented toward the top of the assembly.

I posted several pictures a few weeks ago, including original spring measurements when in place of 31 cm, when we exchanged my standard rear shocks for Bilsteins, see: https://rennlist.com/forums/10459143-post30.html
That orientation seems to make sense as it matches the orientation of the lettering printed on them. Thanks for the link, I'm surprised I missed it since gathering info on the spring installation has been on mind for a few weeks now as I contemplate how to approach this...I've replaced shock / spring assemblies before, but never rebuilt one myself.

Originally Posted by FLYVMO
Those springs look like the Eibach progressive springs, and they are shorter than the stock Porsche linear springs. Hopefully you have a set of 4 as otherwise your car will have a mix of progressive spring rates in the rear with linear in the front. Those springs also have a higher spring rate (stiffer) than stock.

Cheers!
Carl
Yup, they are the Eibachs. The two fronts went in a while back so they'll be similar all around.


Originally Posted by ammonman
IIRC the orientation of the springs w/regard to the tighter coils doesn't matter. The "softer" section of the coils will compress before the "stiffer" section.

Mike
I'll have a look at them in the AM to see if they work either way, seems odd though that you could opt for either direction. If that's the case though, my OCD would require the letters face right side up



Originally Posted by Hilton
Looks like you've got the Eibach progressive ones.. they are indeed much shorter than stock.

Here's the eibachs next to stock S4 fronts and rears:
Yup, similar comparison. Funny I just found the thread from 928 intl selling these, and it says the larger diameter tubing use to make these allows for a shorter spring.



I'll have a go at them in the AM, but I was wondering if I need to pre-set the stop on the threaded collar higher up on the threading to "take up some slack" created by the shorter spring, or will the stiffer spring do part of that? I'm guessing it'll probably be more obvious once I start assembling it - just curious what other have done.

Thanks,
Dave
Old 05-25-2013, 04:38 PM
  #22  
aaddpp
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
aaddpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muriland
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One done, one to go. Pretty straight forward...though, as you tighten the top nut down, the dust shield begins to **** sideways. Seems to straighten itself though as you get closer to the torque value. Last job is to finish torquing...cant get enough leverage with a 7mm wrench and a crows foot on a torque wrench. any thoughts? Also, do the spring ends (or the spring caps) need to face in any particular direction, or can they sit anywhere in the 360 degrees
Attached Images  



Quick Reply: Rear Suspension Replacement Parts



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:12 AM.