Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Compression test values

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2013, 11:20 AM
  #1  
EMan 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
EMan 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland, MI
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Default Compression test values

Could someone tell me what I should expect for compression test values for a 1993 GTS with 70k miles? Doing a test as I write this at an Indy shop and coming up with the following values for 1-4:

#1 160/178
#2 142/160
#3 160/180
#4 150/162

Note that my battery is fairly weak and we're not getting as much ooomph when we crank it over, which may affect the numbers a little bit.

Thanks,
Old 03-01-2013, 11:31 AM
  #2  
EMan 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
EMan 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland, MI
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Values for 5-8:

#5 130/140
#6 110/120
#7 160/180
#8 150/170
Old 03-01-2013, 12:00 PM
  #3  
Kevin in Atlanta
Rennlist Member
 
Kevin in Atlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,104
Received 802 Likes on 481 Posts
Default

Try again with fresh battery.
Old 03-01-2013, 12:05 PM
  #4  
Herman K
Rennlist Member
 
Herman K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rockport, TX
Posts: 1,697
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

That looks like you have way to much variance should be around 180 +/- 10% all around.

Did you use a digital gauge (way more accurate and they keep each cylinder in memory) http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mityvac-MV55...c858ff&vxp=mtr
Old 03-01-2013, 12:43 PM
  #5  
davek9
Rennlist Member
 
davek9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 5,148
Received 347 Likes on 192 Posts
Default

Just got off the phone w/ Erick, the engine was also stone cold (should be at least warm).
I suggested he also tries a leak-down test, but I'm leaning toward this is carbon on the valve seats.

Dave
Old 03-01-2013, 12:58 PM
  #6  
oups59
Three Wheelin'
 
oups59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shefford,Quebec
Posts: 1,898
Received 46 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

If I remember correctly, mine was between 190-205
Old 03-01-2013, 02:27 PM
  #7  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,824
Received 239 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davek9
Just got off the phone w/ Erick, the engine was also stone cold (should be at least warm).
I suggested he also tries a leak-down test, but I'm leaning toward this is carbon on the valve seats.

Dave
Cold shouldn't matter if he does it wet.

But you really want comparison between dry and wet so warm is definitely preferred.

Is that what the 1st and 2nd #s are, dry/wet?

Also, you should have at least five revs for the reading to "pump up" so cranking power could be an issue.

It helps if you pull all the plugs so you’re only cranking against compression of one cylinder.

Last edited by depami; 03-01-2013 at 03:09 PM.
Old 03-01-2013, 04:16 PM
  #8  
EMan 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
EMan 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland, MI
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Thanks, Depami.

For the first and second numbers, indy mechanic cranked 3 times as the low, took the reading, then 3 more times and took that final reading as the high.

Engine wasn't run in 24 hours and the shop was 60 degrees room temp. And he had the 4 spark plugs removed on one bank when he performed the test (other bank still had the spark plugs installed)



Originally Posted by depami
Cold shouldn't matter if he does it wet.

But you really want comparison between dry and wet so warm is definitely preferred.

Is that what the 1st and 2nd #s are, dry/wet?

Also, you should have at least five revs for the reading to "pump up" so cranking power could be an issue.

It helps if you pull all the plugs so you’re only cranking against compression of one cylinder.
Old 03-01-2013, 05:27 PM
  #9  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,651
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

The important part is to be consistent with each cylinder and then look for consistency across the holes. Remove all the plugs to start with so it spins more quickly. Remove the relay for the fuel pump. Count 5 or 6 cycles with the key on and throttle wide open and then read the value quickly. Re-testing low holes is a good idea as the adapter may not seal well.

Absolute numbers vary with the pre-conditioning, gauge, battery and the technique. Do the first hole over again to see if the battery loss was making the numbers trend down.

Last edited by GlenL; 03-02-2013 at 10:35 AM. Reason: Duh... Twice
Old 03-01-2013, 06:16 PM
  #10  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Was the throttle wide open for the tests ?
Old 03-01-2013, 06:29 PM
  #11  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,824
Received 239 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

As Glen and others have pointed out, consistency is more important than the numbers themselves.
Generally you don’t want more than 10% variation between highest and lowest cylinders. I’m not understanding the before/after meanings but compared to the others, #6 looks to be too low for sure. 160 – 10% = 142. I would test again ensuring 5 plus revs for the reading then do it again with an ounce or two off heavy oil added. If highest and lowest are within 10% of each other when tested wet, I’d think you should be good.

The WSM says 8 bar or more new, 6.5 bar wear limit. That is 116 PSI or more new, 94 PSI wear limit.

And as John points out, the throttle should be wide open during test.
Old 03-01-2013, 08:19 PM
  #12  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 338 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Was the throttle wide open for the tests ?
+1^^^^ and a fully charged battery. Also, remove all the spark plugs. I think it should be done with a cold engine but a leakdown test would be much better.
Old 03-01-2013, 08:35 PM
  #13  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,280
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Also it needs to crank over around 7 times per cylinder to for the tester needle to stabilise in my experience.

I have two testers - one gives 170-180 and the other gives 190-200 results, on the same car. So as noted above, worry more about variation between cylinders than absolute numbers.

The absolute pressure can be affected by pinholes, cracked o-rings, loose seals etc. on the tester - its not like they're highly-calibrated tools
Old 03-01-2013, 09:59 PM
  #14  
EMan 928
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
EMan 928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland, MI
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback everyone. No, I don't believe the throttle was wide open for the tests. I may end up buying my own compression tester and do it myself next time. Right now I think I'm going to put some sea foam in the fuel and see if I can burn a little carbon...there was some present when we scoped it. Then, a leak down test.
Old 03-01-2013, 10:04 PM
  #15  
depami
Rennlist Member
 
depami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cleveland, MN
Posts: 2,824
Received 239 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

What is the issue that led you to a compression test?


Quick Reply: Compression test values



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:32 PM.