Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Anyone tangle with a V?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2012, 12:18 AM
  #61  
robot808
Rennlist Member
 
robot808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Gretch, There was a time when you cared?
Old 08-31-2012, 12:56 AM
  #62  
White Lightnin'
Rennlist Member
 
White Lightnin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somewhere, NC............................... Posts: Not nearly enough!
Posts: 3,065
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Old 09-09-2012, 12:57 PM
  #63  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by curt_928
Well I did burn this neon the other day... and I did get smoked by a new Honda Prelude though at a stoplight in my 79' (stock I might add). 1000HP CTS-V? How much does that put down on the rear wheels.
Anybody who mods a car and then brags about beating a stock "off the dealer lot" car shouldn't get too many nods of appreciation. Big deal. It's sounds like these 18 year olds in their 700HP civics. Big deal who cares. Modded cars are a fools game. You're better than the next guy until he mods his with more boost pressure, bigger turbo etc. etc. Ad infinitum.

As far as cost... when the boost kit costs more than the car it's going into, you have your answer before it's begun.
Here's that answer to the question how much rear wheel horsepower a modded CTS-V puts out even thou a modded 7 liter LS7
with Twin Turbos....and to the answer of how will a CTS-V stand up to cars in 20 years,the HP already speaks for itself,I think it will do just fine!
1066 HP at the rear wheels!
964 Rear wheel torque!
http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoram...190832135.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=-RTpw4MIdVc

Last edited by inactiveuser1; 09-11-2012 at 09:44 AM.
Old 09-09-2012, 04:23 PM
  #64  
17prospective buyer
Three Wheelin'
 
17prospective buyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singhampton, Ontario/London, Ontario
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nobody cares.
Old 09-09-2012, 06:55 PM
  #65  
Gretch
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Gretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 54,291
Received 1,235 Likes on 755 Posts
Default

no ****.
Old 09-09-2012, 07:12 PM
  #66  
rgs944
Drifting
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M928
Here's that answer to the question how much rear wheel horsepower a modded CTS-V puts out even thou a modded 7 liter LS7
with Twin Turbos....and to the answer of how will a CTS-V stand up to cars in 20 years,the HP already speaks for itself,I think it will do just fine!
1066 HP at the rear wheels!
964 Rear wheel torque!
http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoram...190832135.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=-RTpw4MIdVc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RTpw...=results_video
It looks to me like the same old trick Buick used in "87". Take a handfull of production cars and modify them to know end and then get people to believe that all of them are that fast. "12 lucky owner's", I would hardly classify that as any thing that remotely resembles a production car. Of course calling the Buggati a produciton car is absolutly hilarious as well.

Last edited by rgs944; 09-09-2012 at 07:43 PM.
Old 09-09-2012, 07:24 PM
  #67  
17prospective buyer
Three Wheelin'
 
17prospective buyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Singhampton, Ontario/London, Ontario
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread=pissing contest.
Old 09-09-2012, 08:10 PM
  #68  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 17prospective buyer
This thread=pissing contest.
I guess you're right on that.
The stock V got pissed on while the modifed V is pissing off.
Old 09-09-2012, 10:37 PM
  #69  
ChristianR
Three Wheelin'
 
ChristianR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Memphis/Chicago
Posts: 1,611
Received 140 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

this thread is stupid as he11, you are trying to justify. a race is a race, you "run what you brung", period. age, cost, etc has nothing to do with it

my guess is he beat a 1st generation V, a win is a win. 2nd gen V's are stout
Old 09-09-2012, 10:48 PM
  #70  
killav
Rennlist Member
 
killav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 1,534
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I see wheel spin in that dyno video (white tire smoke) meaning that number is probably a little low......I wouldn't want to tangle with that particular V.
Old 09-09-2012, 10:51 PM
  #71  
killav
Rennlist Member
 
killav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Posts: 1,534
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

And with only twelve in existence, the odds of that ever happening are next to zilch lol.
Old 09-09-2012, 11:13 PM
  #72  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,566
Received 2,182 Likes on 1,232 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M928
Here's that answer to the question how much rear wheel horsepower a modded CTS-V puts out even thou a modded 7 liter LS7
with Twin Turbos....and to the answer of how will a CTS-V stand up to cars in 20 years,the HP already speaks for itself,I think it will do just fine!
There are two (possibly three) 928's in Green Bay that would give that CTS-V a run for it's money (while costing a lot less....)

Take the same budget that produced that monster CTS-V and apply it to a 928....no contest.

Originally Posted by ChristianR
2nd gen V's are stout
They also weigh over 4,200lbs.

556bhp @ 4,200lbs versus Gretch with 500hp to the rear wheels @ 3,600lbs

Winner = Gretch

He would have blown a 1st generation into oblivion so bad the driver would have checked his rear view mirror for a parachute.

The #1 disadvantage a high power 928 has against modern cars is traction off the line, not an issue with a roll-on race.
That is why Todd is working on launch control on his twin turbo.
Old 09-09-2012, 11:16 PM
  #73  
ChristianR
Three Wheelin'
 
ChristianR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Memphis/Chicago
Posts: 1,611
Received 140 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

what does it cost to get a '88+ to 500hp at the wheels
Old 09-09-2012, 11:27 PM
  #74  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

...........
Old 09-09-2012, 11:29 PM
  #75  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gretch

CTS V

set the record at the Nurburgring for a 4-door sedan (7:59.32) in May, 2008.

and held that record until it was broken by a Panamera Turbo a year later (7:56 and change) in July, 2009...

http://www.caranddriver.com/news/200...-ring-car-news

http://www.clublexus.com/forums/car-...rburgring.html


Quick Reply: Anyone tangle with a V?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:29 PM.