great looking ob
11-01-2011, 12:19 PM
#46
I don't know what that means ^^, the 928 was never a luxobarge, never a choice between an SL and a 928. I was being kind to fcars when I compared this 928 price to the 308. The 928 was a better car in every respect to the 3X8's. The 928 was always in the running with the TR.
Read some previous threads, like the nardo top speed runs, the magazine comparisons of the day. And I was there in showrooms in 1980 comparing these cars. Even the European press agrees.
The 928 had the most luxury, no doubt, but it also was at the very top for performance, and build quality. Fcars had the marketing.
Read some previous threads, like the nardo top speed runs, the magazine comparisons of the day. And I was there in showrooms in 1980 comparing these cars. Even the European press agrees.
The 928 had the most luxury, no doubt, but it also was at the very top for performance, and build quality. Fcars had the marketing.
But to compare a 2 seater mid engine car with the 2+2 928 (albeit similar price approx $40k) isn't the same. Performance may be equal (will give you that). But the different cars all out sports car versus GT cruiser. Also comparison made to the 911 and turbo which is more apt. OK.. I'll submit 400i then. 2+2, similar engine layout.. (interesting though that 308 maintain 75 to 100% of their value on average versus 25% or less 928)
928 and TR. Beg to disagree. 1990 testarossa $181k 195 MPH dreamcar, 1990 928 $78k Handling more nimble perhaps.. higher top end in TR
11-01-2011, 02:28 PM
#47
Drifting
I will agree that the 928 has superior quality to the FCars of its generation and for the bang for the buck it's still a great buy (under $5000 for performance)..
But to compare a 2 seater mid engine car with the 2+2 928 (albeit similar price approx $40k) isn't the same. Performance may be equal (will give you that). But the different cars all out sports car versus GT cruiser. Also comparison made to the 911 and turbo which is more apt. OK.. I'll submit 400i then. 2+2, similar engine layout.. (interesting though that 308 maintain 75 to 100% of their value on average versus 25% or less 928)
928 and TR. Beg to disagree. 1990 testarossa $181k 195 MPH dreamcar, 1990 928 $78k Handling more nimble perhaps.. higher top end in TR
But to compare a 2 seater mid engine car with the 2+2 928 (albeit similar price approx $40k) isn't the same. Performance may be equal (will give you that). But the different cars all out sports car versus GT cruiser. Also comparison made to the 911 and turbo which is more apt. OK.. I'll submit 400i then. 2+2, similar engine layout.. (interesting though that 308 maintain 75 to 100% of their value on average versus 25% or less 928)
928 and TR. Beg to disagree. 1990 testarossa $181k 195 MPH dreamcar, 1990 928 $78k Handling more nimble perhaps.. higher top end in TR
Your knowledge is not up to speed. Find Tony Lapines comment. Read the Nardo thread. Then we can talk.
11-02-2011, 09:45 AM
#49
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
If you look at the first few years of road tests, the 928 was compared to the Jag XJS, Mercedes SLC, Aston Martin V8, Maserati 2+2, Ferrari Dino 308 GT4 etc.... I agree that the 308 GTB/S is not a true comparison. I have owned a few examples of both and currently own both. If I want to take a long trip or need some cargo space, or have a comfortable daily driver, the 928 is the choice. If you want quick "racing car feel" fix, the 308 is better. Even though the 928 is a capable car, it just feels like a cruiser. My recently departed 993 Turbo weighed about the same as the 928 that I picked up. However, the 993 felt so much lighter and agile when driving.
11-02-2011, 01:31 PM
#50
Drifting
No opinion from me, just numbers, here https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...o-beat-it.html
great thread for numbers
T
