Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

correct thermostat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2011, 10:31 AM
  #1  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default correct thermostat?

working on a 87 S4 and part of the project is the waterbridge gaskets and t.stat.

The PET listed part # doesn't state the temperature value and the new part shipped is 75C. 928INT lists the part number as 75C

The dilema, the thermostat I pulled off the engine is 83C and looks original?
Old 08-14-2011, 10:40 AM
  #2  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

83 Deg C is the stock 928 thermostat. 75 deg C is lower than stock.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 08-14-2011, 11:45 AM
  #3  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Sure seems that way Dan

I dug out the old t.stat from the 90 GT......83C
Old 08-14-2011, 01:57 PM
  #4  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,831
Received 881 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

Actually not correct according to PET (not saying PET is 100% correct). However PET very clearly states that from 87 to 89 that our cars used 928 106 129 16 (75C) and from 90 onwards used the 928 106 129 17 (83C). Up until 86 there was a choice of the 16 or 17.
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 08-14-2011, 02:02 PM
  #5  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

thx Roger.

I sent an email with further detail.
Old 08-14-2011, 02:12 PM
  #6  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Interesting.......wonder if that is WHY so many later model 928s the Owners think the temp gauge reads a bit high for "normal" ???
Old 08-14-2011, 02:29 PM
  #7  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,831
Received 881 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

I always thought that the 83C was the norm and that the 75C was the cooler choice. About 18 months ago some of my European and Australian customers pointed out that they wanted 75C and not 83C as 83C was not correct for the 87 to 89 cars.
Old 08-14-2011, 02:41 PM
  #8  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The usual reason for running them a bit hot is for the reduced emissions. That need for higher temps is what just about killed the aircooled 911 and was a primary motivation for designing the 928. The 2.7 liter USA engines literally had thermal reactor cans under the exhaust ports to pass. The big problem then became all that heat caused to much stress on the head studs which promptly pulled out of the engine case. The cases are magnesium and could be "fixed" with casesaver threaded oversized inserts.

Became such a common problem that Porsche reverted back to aluminum cases with the 3 liters in 1978. Which is WHY the 78 > 911s are so much better cars ! Never EVER buy a 2.7 engine 911 if it has just a little exhaust leak Because odds are the heads are about to fall off !
Old 08-14-2011, 06:16 PM
  #9  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

It is indeed interesting.........I use PET 7.0 and for the '87 MY it lists 2 part numbers......up to '89 then '90 and above. There is no indication of temp. with either Porsche part number.

The car Im working on belongs to the original owner who has all records. The t.stat was never changed prior to my removal of the waterbridge and has the 83c stat fitted from factory....thats all I know .
Old 08-14-2011, 06:37 PM
  #10  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,831
Received 881 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

The part numbers are very specific in that the 16 = 75C and the 17 = 83C.
However here is the answer from Porsche - the current master parts list gives a supersede from the 16 to the 17.
So if we were to order a 16 75C thermostat from Porsche they would supply you with 17 83C.

Jim your explanation maybe exactly what happened.
Old 08-14-2011, 07:10 PM
  #11  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 500 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Just put the 75 in there and you will be fine. Won't make any difference on how the car runs. I've been running a 75 for 3 years and install them whenever a customer asks for one. They might have a smaller surface at the rear but it fits on the seal perfectly.
Old 08-14-2011, 07:36 PM
  #12  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wow, that's a new one. Another 928 model year oddity. Could this thermostat change have anything to do with the '87's coinciding piston squirters... ?

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 08-15-2011, 03:21 AM
  #13  
Melo928
Advanced
 
Melo928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting.......wonder if that is WHY so many later model 928s the Owners think the temp gauge reads a bit high for "normal" ???
I have noticed that Wahler (83o) keeps engine cooler than Behr (83o), they have different opening curve. This could also explain some cars running warmer than other..

Basically you have three temperature choices: 75o, Wahler and Behr.
Old 08-15-2011, 11:10 AM
  #14  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

This brings up another interesting question. Could it be that the '87-'89 928's have a different fan controller that turns the fans on earlier to go along with the 75 deg thermostat? PET lists only 928 618 418 00 from '87-95. Or maybe the thermostat choice was because of the cooling flaps.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft

Last edited by dprantl; 08-15-2011 at 11:56 AM.
Old 08-15-2011, 09:05 PM
  #15  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

My mid-year production 1989 car (build12/88) came with the 83ºC thermostat from the factory. I tried the 75ºC thermostat for a while and it was just wrestling with the fan and flap controller in traffic. Just made the cycle between on and off bigger. Car did run a little cooler on the open road with the flaps open, but with the flap operating it didn't make much difference-- just cycled more.

So new regular 'stat is in and the flaps are de-fused right now. Makes for even bigger swings on cold (that's only SoCal cold...) days at low loads. The factory method seems to give the most consistent temp readings, never too cold, seldom over 190ºF indicated.


Quick Reply: correct thermostat?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:47 AM.