Installing rebuilt AFM (Air Flow Meter)
08-03-2011, 03:15 PM
#16
Rennlist Member
Right, so you don't have an 82 (read your original quote).
His 84 is also 310HP, same as your 86. I have one also, 84 @310.
Sorry Brett, I know too much about them.
His 84 is also 310HP, same as your 86. I have one also, 84 @310.
Sorry Brett, I know too much about them.
08-03-2011, 03:24 PM
#17
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I must be missing something here regarding hp....
In the UK... S2`s (16 valve) had 300 or 310 hp.(up to 86)
In the UK... S4`s (32 valve) had 320 hp. (86/87 onwards)
I had heard that the American (non ROW) had less because of the cats etc ?
I seem to remember a figure of 286 for American 16 valves (maybe from a post here)
Just taken this from WIKI >>>> North American-spec 1983 and 1984 S models used, among other differences, smaller valves, milder camshafts, narrower intake manifolds, and additional pollution equipment in order to meet emissions regulations, and were limited to 234 hp (174 kW/230 PS) as a result.
All the best Brett
08-03-2011, 03:34 PM
#18
Rennlist Member
Brett, USA got the ROW cars as well, grey market, without cats.
In 80, 81, 82 and 83, they were mechanical injection (CIS) 300 HP
In 84/5/6 they were LH/EZ/MAF 310 HP (I have one of these, 16valve.)
Yes, 85/6 32V cars had 288 hp USA. ( I have two of these )
Yes, much less HP for 16V USA cars with the AFM, which is the subject of our OP's post and doesn't have the ability to set residual CO level ( I have 2 of these )
You confused things saying that your 82 had a MAF that could be adjusted and that it had 310 HP.
You meant to say 84 I guess.
In 80, 81, 82 and 83, they were mechanical injection (CIS) 300 HP
In 84/5/6 they were LH/EZ/MAF 310 HP (I have one of these, 16valve.)
Yes, 85/6 32V cars had 288 hp USA. ( I have two of these )
Yes, much less HP for 16V USA cars with the AFM, which is the subject of our OP's post and doesn't have the ability to set residual CO level ( I have 2 of these )
You confused things saying that your 82 had a MAF that could be adjusted and that it had 310 HP.
You meant to say 84 I guess.
08-03-2011, 03:46 PM
#19
Racer
yep. Condused... Me2.
Brett, you made me wonder if I got it totally wrong.... but the 1982 is a CIS (K-jetronic). Nothing else. The S2 was introduced in 1984 with a LH2.2 ecu and hotwire MAF.
BTW: dunno if you guys know this spreadsheet I made: http://jenniskens.livedsl.nl/Evolution/928specs.xls
Any comments or corrections appreciated.
Brett, you made me wonder if I got it totally wrong.... but the 1982 is a CIS (K-jetronic). Nothing else. The S2 was introduced in 1984 with a LH2.2 ecu and hotwire MAF.
BTW: dunno if you guys know this spreadsheet I made: http://jenniskens.livedsl.nl/Evolution/928specs.xls
Any comments or corrections appreciated.
08-03-2011, 03:57 PM
#20
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Brett, USA got the ROW cars as well, grey market, without cats.
In 80, 81, 82 and 83, they were mechanical injection (CIS) 300 HP
In 84/5/6 they were LH/EZ/MAF 310 HP (I have one of these, 16valve.)
Yes, 85/6 32V cars had 288 hp USA. ( I have two of these )
Yes, much less HP for 16V USA cars with the AFM, which is the subject of our OP's post and doesn't have the ability to set residual CO level ( I have 2 of these )
You confused things saying that your 82 had a MAF that could be adjusted and that it had 310 HP.
You meant to say 84 I guess.
In 80, 81, 82 and 83, they were mechanical injection (CIS) 300 HP
In 84/5/6 they were LH/EZ/MAF 310 HP (I have one of these, 16valve.)
Yes, 85/6 32V cars had 288 hp USA. ( I have two of these )
Yes, much less HP for 16V USA cars with the AFM, which is the subject of our OP's post and doesn't have the ability to set residual CO level ( I have 2 of these )
You confused things saying that your 82 had a MAF that could be adjusted and that it had 310 HP.
You meant to say 84 I guess.
You are absolutely correct...in my first post I said mine was an 86...in my second I said 82
(now edited to 86)Personally I think you are just greedy owning 3 928s lol
Although I recently nearly bought a 928 GT for £4850, until the Ebay seller withdrew it
It was just too good a price to let it go....On the other subject, I didnt realise that the US got grey market cars....your 86 must be identical to mine...310 hp,LH/EZ/MAF etc etc...has yours got rear aircon as mine hasnt and never seen it on any UK car ?
All the best Brett
08-03-2011, 04:00 PM
#21
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
yep. Condused... Me2.
Brett, you made me wonder if I got it totally wrong.... but the 1982 is a CIS (K-jetronic). Nothing else. The S2 was introduced in 1984 with a LH2.2 ecu and hotwire MAF.
BTW: dunno if you guys know this spreadsheet I made: http://jenniskens.livedsl.nl/Evolution/928specs.xls
Any comments or corrections appreciated.
Brett, you made me wonder if I got it totally wrong.... but the 1982 is a CIS (K-jetronic). Nothing else. The S2 was introduced in 1984 with a LH2.2 ecu and hotwire MAF.
BTW: dunno if you guys know this spreadsheet I made: http://jenniskens.livedsl.nl/Evolution/928specs.xls
Any comments or corrections appreciated.
Not seen that speadsheet before..its very good...saved it for perusal later...is it in Dutch ?
All the best Brett
08-03-2011, 04:33 PM
#24
I went to see it. Would have been good for someone who wanted to spend a few thousand to bring it up to good running order. Every oil containing part of the car leaked. As I already have an overhaul in the garage I left it.
If you are still looking there is another GT in Surrey - check Autotrader, down to 5800 from 8500. Drives OK.
If you are still looking there is another GT in Surrey - check Autotrader, down to 5800 from 8500. Drives OK.
08-03-2011, 06:13 PM
#25
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I went to see it. Would have been good for someone who wanted to spend a few thousand to bring it up to good running order. Every oil containing part of the car leaked. As I already have an overhaul in the garage I left it.
If you are still looking there is another GT in Surrey - check Autotrader, down to 5800 from 8500. Drives OK.
If you are still looking there is another GT in Surrey - check Autotrader, down to 5800 from 8500. Drives OK.
Did he sell it / and how much for if you know?
It looked in better condidtion than you said, but that was only the advert lol, but I would have looked at it before I made my final bid...
All the best Brett
08-05-2011, 08:29 PM
#26
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed this thread got a little sidetracked...:-).
Thought I would give an update. I replaced the AFM today and it looks like I nailed down the culprit. The car is completely transformed. Zero hesitation, excellent throttle response, much smoother idle. When I got it out, it definitely appeared that someone down the line had messed with it.
This weekend I will get down to cleaning those ground points as discussed just to "complete" the job.
Thanks Again! Now on to the remaining 100 items on the 928 to-do list.
Thought I would give an update. I replaced the AFM today and it looks like I nailed down the culprit. The car is completely transformed. Zero hesitation, excellent throttle response, much smoother idle. When I got it out, it definitely appeared that someone down the line had messed with it.
This weekend I will get down to cleaning those ground points as discussed just to "complete" the job.
Thanks Again! Now on to the remaining 100 items on the 928 to-do list.
08-06-2011, 04:39 AM
#28
Racer
I decided not to make a Dutch tab as the "audience" would be pretty limited
best regards,
