Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Dyno results from “Bonneville” motor, 765 WHP, 900 CHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2011, 11:01 PM
  #196  
sharknoob
Pro
 
sharknoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buffalo N,Y
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I would have to guess that oil pan may slow him down a little draging in the salt... Thanks Rob for those pics I lost them
Old 04-16-2011, 12:13 AM
  #197  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
I have an older G-Tech Pro. Thanks for the heads-up, I will go look at the new ones.

This looks interesting... http://www.velocitek.com/speedpuck/

...but it looks like it only displays in knots. I like the large display.
The speedpuck can be set to motorsport mode - mph or kph or m/s or knots. Need to connect it to a computer to set the mode. Remebered this as raced a yacht with one that got inadvertently put in ms mode. Couldn't change it back til we got ashore
Old 04-18-2011, 05:14 PM
  #198  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I understand what you mean by "used" 1.5L of oil- you pumped it out of the motor. Do address your crankcase pressure before you blow all the seals out of that motor! When the crankcase pressure comes down the piston rings will seal better and you will also gain HP.
Old 04-18-2011, 06:12 PM
  #199  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
my stock speedo will stop at 165ish and I don't know what it'll do above that.
rpm+math? Works for me.
Old 04-18-2011, 06:57 PM
  #200  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Carl, North Hollywood Speedo can recalibrate your speedo and change the face.
Old 04-18-2011, 07:22 PM
  #201  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by auzivision
Stroked and blown, what more could a guy ask for?

Steak beforehand?

http://www.steakandbjday.com/
Old 04-18-2011, 07:26 PM
  #202  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

So..this is Sept 14th-17th..


Im strongly considering flying out in the Bonanza for this, if I can find three more peeps in NorCal who wanna go check this out.

Its about a 2.5hr flight to Wendover each way.

http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/104720.html (this one to be exact)
Old 04-18-2011, 07:50 PM
  #203  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,583
Received 2,200 Likes on 1,241 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
my stock speedo will stop at 165ish and I don't know what it'll do above that.
This reminds me of a conversation I had with our test driver a few years ago after pushing one of the cars pretty hard on the private test track only a few know about:

Me - How did it go?
Driver - Great, the car handled perfectly
Me - How fast did you get it up to?
Driver - M
Me - M? How fast is M?
Driver - I'm not sure, but that's where the needle was pointing.

No, this wasn't an 85 speedo

Old 05-24-2011, 10:45 PM
  #204  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Here are some photos of the new exhaust system we just finished for the Bonneville setup.

The primary goal was reducing crankcase pressure caused by exhaust back-pressure, and we succeeded at that.

Last month we were still were running last year's exhaust system; the same 3.0" dual exhaust I ran on last years' 650 HP 16v motor. On this 900 HP motor, we noticed crank pressure go up, so we knew we had too small of an exhaust system for this motor.

Here are the stats from the two exhausts on the same engine:

3.0 dual exhaust: 18 psi in the intake plenum, 2.8 psi in the crankcase at 6800 rpm, and 4 psi of exhaust back-pressure at 6800 rpm.

3.5" dual exhaust: 15 psi in the intake plenum, 2.0 psi in the crankcase at 6800 rpm, and 1 psi of back-pressure at 6800 rpm.

Note that the exhaust was the only change. We ran the same pulleys, supercharger, etc. The difference in intake pressure between the 3.0" and 3.5" exhaust shows that the 3.0" setup was so restrictive at this level (900 HP) that it was backing up thru the cylinders and lowering our volumetric efficiency.

Now the supercharger does not have to work so hard to overcome the back-pressure, the parasitic losses are less, and the engine breathes better.

Made from all 304 SS, .065 wall mandrel elbows, .049 wall straights. V-band clamps instead of header flanges.

Some photos represent work-in-progress. Thats why only the last photo shows the balance tube section.
Attached Images           

Last edited by Carl Fausett; 05-24-2011 at 11:27 PM.
Old 05-25-2011, 12:18 AM
  #205  
Iwanna928
Rennlist Member
 
Iwanna928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Woodstock Ga.
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That looks AWESOME!
Old 05-25-2011, 12:22 AM
  #206  
pcar928fan
Nordschleife Master
 
pcar928fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,337
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Looks like some beautiful welding work...
Old 05-25-2011, 12:51 AM
  #207  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

WOW dual 3.5's just seems like overkill....but with nearly 1000hp.....its NOT
Old 05-25-2011, 01:31 AM
  #208  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
WOW dual 3.5's just seems like overkill....but with nearly 1000hp.....its NOT

I agree. For the street you would have less bottom end (IMO)

For the top end on a big block it is what you need.

Maybe a foot of 2.5" in the center on each side would help street bottom end perf.

But before I buy any thing anymore I'm asking some of the guys on here that would know for sure
Old 05-25-2011, 05:41 AM
  #209  
Strosek Ultra
Rennlist Member
 
Strosek Ultra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mostly in my workshop located in Sweden.
Posts: 2,230
Received 463 Likes on 248 Posts
Default

Amongst engine builders it is commonly accepted that the right size of tailpipe for a 750 hp engine is 5" or dual 3,5". For a 1000+ hp engine the tailpipe size need to be increased to dual 4".

Ake
Old 05-25-2011, 06:37 AM
  #210  
daveo90s4
Pro
 
daveo90s4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 686
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Carl, at post 204 it looks like you have your front 'axle' stands underneath the thin-walled box section that simply provides a bit of stiffening to the floor pan. Maybe you have stiffened this section or done some other modification (maybe U-section steel supports atop axle stands? - hard to tell from the photos) to make this an OK lifting place.....??


Quick Reply: Dyno results from “Bonneville” motor, 765 WHP, 900 CHP



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:31 AM.