Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

1985 -> S4 transformation = indistinguishable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #1  
By-Tor's Avatar
By-Tor
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 476
Likes: 271
Default 1985 -> S4 transformation = indistinguishable?

Guys, check this out. It's advertised as 1985 model but has the S4 looks. If you change the rear bumper, lights and rear & front spoilers, are there any visual differences left?



http://www.autoscout24.se/Details.aspx?id=182035810

I'm not buying this car, nor planning to do such transformation... I'm just curious.
Old 11-05-2010 | 06:52 PM
  #2  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,692
Likes: 2,860
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Are we sure it's not just a typo in the ad and it's really an '87? No engine pics to verify.
Old 11-05-2010 | 06:56 PM
  #3  
By-Tor's Avatar
By-Tor
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 476
Likes: 271
Default

I have no idea. It's been there for quite a while already. I was just asking because I thought there might be something else that you can tell the new and old model apart (for sure).

Really nice looking car, whatever it is. If it's a S4, it's one of the cheapest in the EU too.
Old 11-05-2010 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
Leon Speed's Avatar
Leon Speed
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Default

Front brake caliper is shown in one pic and is pre-S4.
Old 11-05-2010 | 07:20 PM
  #5  
Leon Speed's Avatar
Leon Speed
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Default

One more thing, the wing seems to sit a little too high.
Old 11-05-2010 | 08:47 PM
  #6  
Nicole's Avatar
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 25,784
Likes: 150
From: Silly Valley, CA
Default

This is very nicely done! You really have to know what to look for, in order to see that it's an "imitation" S4.

Check the extra gauge in the instruments - I don't think S4 models ever came with this one
Old 11-05-2010 | 08:51 PM
  #7  
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
hacker-pschorr
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 2,251
From: Up Nort
Default

What a way to ruin a perfectly good looking S bodied car.
That's like putting a 996 body kit on a 993.




Old 11-05-2010 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
Marine Blue's Avatar
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,020
Likes: 808
From: Temecula, CA
Default

rocker panels are different on the OB's
Old 11-05-2010 | 09:38 PM
  #9  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,155
Likes: 371
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

Wonder what prompted the new body parts?
Old 11-05-2010 | 09:47 PM
  #10  
By-Tor's Avatar
By-Tor
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 476
Likes: 271
Default

It could have been done from 2 cars... maybe they had an old S that had a working engine & transmission but bad body & paint... and the S4 had good body & some bad technical issues (like the thrust bearing/ engine failure).

In the 1990's the price difference between the old & new models was HUGE in the Europe. Maybe it was already done back then... someone wanted a "newer car" this way. Same way they're bastardizing those early 70's 911's now... with 964/993 body kits.

Just guessing.
Old 11-05-2010 | 11:52 PM
  #11  
928mac's Avatar
928mac
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

Very very clean. The wing is to high and there is another gauge in the tach area
Old 11-06-2010 | 06:27 AM
  #12  
RyanPerrella's Avatar
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 3
From: Beverly Hills, CA
Default

just looking at the pic

yes its very convincing and appears to be a great looking car

i think Rob is onto something though. Every S to S4 conversion I've seen looked terrible. Im going to say misstated year.
Old 11-06-2010 | 06:55 AM
  #13  
blitz928's Avatar
blitz928
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
just looking at the pic

yes its very convincing and appears to be a great looking car

i think Rob is onto something though. Every S to S4 conversion I've seen looked terrible. Im going to say misstated year.
I agree with Ryan, the amount of work to make the conversion look that good, wouldn't make sense. That looks like an S4.
Old 11-06-2010 | 07:58 AM
  #14  
Mike Frye's Avatar
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 6
From: Jersey Shore, USA
Default

Exhaust on '85 is not dual exhaust and comes out the side behind the wheel, that must have been changed as well.
Old 11-06-2010 | 08:09 AM
  #15  
Emboss's Avatar
Emboss
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Default

Differences compared to my '88 S4 (besides the obvious non-standard wheels/exhaust/head unit):
  1. Exterior antenna (none on mine), but only on some of the pics?!?!
  2. Mine has white (possibly glow-in-the-dark, never tested) dots on the interior door handles, which this one doesn't.
  3. The rear spoiler is sitting maybe 5 cm further forward on the hatch, and is painted the body color on this car.
  4. Aero mirrors
  5. No seat memory selector. I don't have any option code for this on mine so presumbly it's standard on at least the '88.
  6. Different scale on the speedo - the 2000 rpm mark lines up with 220 km/h, whereas on mine 2000 rpm mark lines up with 240 (half way between the 220 and the 260).
  7. Redline appears to be at 6000 not 6200, though this could just be a JPEG artefact.
  8. Extra gauge down the bottom of the the tachometer. This gauge shows up in a couple of the diagrams in the 84/85 RoW Owner's Manuals but is never mentioned.

Some of these could be due to regional things or options, but there's enough major things that I'd say it's probably not an '88 S4.


Quick Reply: 1985 -> S4 transformation = indistinguishable?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:39 PM.