Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Surcharger kit recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2011, 04:01 PM
  #106  
Jon B.
Three Wheelin'
 
Jon B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,377
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^^^Just what I was hoping to hear. I'm already running Ken's chips with an S4 regulator and it's got an x-pipe and free flow duals after that. It's gonna be a wild ride once I go for boost!

I just need to see if I can't get some time up in Tim's neck of the woods for some good dyno time. I would think the tune will be pretty spot on from him though out of the box. I would like it optimized however.
Old 02-09-2011, 09:51 PM
  #107  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cosmo Kramer
........ I actually know someone with a mildly boosted S3 actually running AA clone chips in his EZF with no issues!..........

I'm the proud owner of that contraption!

Is this an optimal setup? No.
Am I leaving hp on the table? For sure.
Do I want to spend $2K on a Shakrtuner? Nope!
Is the car fast enough as it is? It sure is to me, good enough for high 12sec.
Is it a safe setup? I think it is. Always runs at the border of rich.
Do I want all the hp that this setup can give? No. Having a nice safety margin is wroth more to me than a couple dozen horsepower.
Is it possible to boost a 928 for less money than is cost to build my setup? I don't think so.

Do I want to line it up with Ted (Cosmo Kramer) to see who is faster? ABSOLUTELY!
Old 02-10-2011, 02:16 AM
  #108  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ranfurly
Hi

I'm getting keen and am thinking about whether to seriously consider commiting some $$ to a supercharger kit. I'm expected to have to bring the kit in from the US so would appreciate info on US supplied kits. So..

A few questions for anyone prepared to provide info to me.
How risky is it putting a supercharger on to the car - will I see a big hole in the block?

How far do you need to go - does it become an endless series up hardware upgrades, or can you truely buy a kit install and not need to do anything else ( bar general madness of wanting to do more etc).

The last biggie - any recommendations as to proven kits - ease of installation, price, quality etc?

As always info and thoughts greatly appreciated.
Haven't heard anything from Carl in awhile on the stage 3 supercharger if that is coming out yet or not.You might also want to see what that does on horsepower.
Old 02-10-2011, 06:09 AM
  #109  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SQLGuy
4. The Murf SC is a Vortech which is self-contained oil lubricated (no oil lines), has somewhere between 73% and 78% efficiency (can't tell for sure because I can't find the details for a V3 T-trim unit), is gear driven, and is rated for pretty large engines (bigger than mine; again, can't find the exact details for this unit).
A few people have asked about the specific model of supercharger used on the Murf kits. It's a Vortech V3 T-trim. It's not shown on Vortech's web site with their other units because it's a model that's not generally available by itself to the general public. It's normally only available as part of a complete Vortech made kit for the C6 Corvettes. It's internally gear driven, uses the helical cut gears for quieter operation, and uses it's own self contained oiling system, so there are no engine oil supply or drain lines required.

Originally Posted by SQLGuy
Originally Posted by AO
Other things to consider are the availability of an upgrade path.

I believe the 928MS kit tops out at about 7psi with no intercooler option to go beyond.

The Murf kit has a Stage III option that can be added at any time. to take you upto about 14psi!
Actually, there is an intercooler option for a Stage II kit: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/32v_stage2.php
Raptor's web site states that there's no warranty if the supercharger is used over 10psi. That doesn't really seem to leave too much room for upgrading unless a different model of supercharger is later purchased as part of the upgrade. I know Carl started out with a Powerdyne supercharger that had an internal drive belt on his track car. It kept breaking those internal belts when he increased the boost, and he ended up switching to a model of supercharger with internal gears on that car. The Murf stage-1 kits use the same Vortech supercharger that the Murf stage-3 kits do. That Vortech is rated to over 20psi, with a 1 year warranty.

Originally Posted by Ed Scherer
Since I just got done with TB/WP and top-end refresh a few months ago, I figure I'm ready to roll with boost, although I'm a little worried about the ancient head gaskets.
The head gaskets are the great unknown. Tim's wife's car has been boosted for years, put on 10's of thousands of miles since being boosted, done countless dyno and road pulls, in temperatures from freezing up to around 100 degrees. It's still running fine with the original 24 year old head gaskets, even with 15psi of boost, and always having used only pump gas. Meanwhile, there have been newer, normally aspirated, completely stock cars that have blown head gaskets. Some head gaskets just rot away from improper coolant, the coolant not being changed regularly, or may not seal well due to something like the engine having been overheated at some point in it's history.

Originally Posted by andy-gts
I have been told the down side to the gts sc I did was the lobe seperation angle of the cams...gt cams much better, but if you are going the sc route I would be tempted to get custom cams from simard(gundrilled) with greg brown and simards reco's on grind....oh that would rock!!!!!
Custom cams would obviously help, but I know that there are some GTS owners with centrifigual superchargers and stock cams that are very happy with the performance. I think that whether they intended to or not, someone may have been using the cams as at least a little bit of a scapegoat in your situation.

Originally Posted by Cosmo Kramer
From my personal experience, octane is the most important factor to keep the knocks away.
There's really only one factor that will cause knock. That's too low of an octane to keep air/fuel mixture from igniting at the temperature that it's at. There are a number of factors that affect what the octane is, and also a number of factors that affect what the temperature is though. Keep in mind that even if there's no knock occurring at all, having the ignition timing set wrong can still end up causing damage to an engine.

Originally Posted by Jon B.
I just need to see if I can't get some time up in Tim's neck of the woods for some good dyno time. I would think the tune will be pretty spot on from him though out of the box. I would like it optimized however.
The kits are supplied with a tune that should run well, make good power, and be safe for the engine. Cars can vary to some extent though, expecially if other modifications have been made to them other than the installation of one of the kits. A custom tune might gain some additional power, even if it's not absolutely necessary. There have been cars that have gone up to Green Bay from different areas of the country for custom tuning, a kit installation, or both.

Last edited by Z; 02-10-2011 at 06:46 AM.
Old 02-10-2011, 10:11 AM
  #110  
SQLGuy
Three Wheelin'
 
SQLGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just to throw one other thing out there, has anyone done anything on a 928 with a Procharger unit? They sound like they combine a lot of the best of both the Vortech and Raptor:

Gear driven
Self contained oiling in many models
Three year warranty
High boost
Billet case and impeller
CW or CCW

Pricing doesn't sound unreasonable either.

Of course, this is mostly from their web site. Is there a downside to these units?
Old 02-10-2011, 10:28 AM
  #111  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

For me, I would much rather have one that is not self contained.

My D1 Procharger on my corvette has around 80,000 miles on it, nary a problem.

Originally Posted by SQLGuy
Just to throw one other thing out there, has anyone done anything on a 928 with a Procharger unit? They sound like they combine a lot of the best of both the Vortech and Raptor:

Gear driven
Self contained oiling in many models
Three year warranty
High boost
Billet case and impeller
CW or CCW

Pricing doesn't sound unreasonable either.

Of course, this is mostly from their web site. Is there a downside to these units?
Old 02-10-2011, 10:29 AM
  #112  
inactiveuser1
Burning Brakes
 
inactiveuser1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seen alot of Prochargers at the drags some bigger units putting out 700+ hp.
Chevy is coming out with ZL1 Camaro in 2012 not sure what unit they are using.
6.2liter Supercharged probably will be another 11 second 1/4 mile street car from the factory.
http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro-zl1/...aro_zl1#image1
Old 02-10-2011, 11:13 AM
  #113  
Cosmo Kramer
Rennlist Member
 
Cosmo Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: On boost
Posts: 4,615
Received 144 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AO
Again, you're wrong...

With the S4, you can adjust how much timing is taken out if it detects a knock event. I believe the maximum retard is 3° per event on that cylinder only, but you can dial it back to ~1° (it's been a while). If subsequent events occur, it will retard it further up to a maximum of 9°.

Then, based on a user-defined time period, timing is advanced in incremental stages per revolution.

In my case where I'm running a fairly aggressive tune, I think I have it take 1.3° of timing out per knock event and have it reintroduce timing within 1 second. I've never seen 9° of timing taken out. Usually it's 2.6° (2 knock events) occasionally it'll hit 4° (3 knock events) on the same cylinder. On my last full pull on the dyno, I think I had a total of 14 knock events - sadly on cyl #2 or #6. if memory serves.

Before getting the SharkTuner, I tried to use the Innovate data logger to record knock, but unfortunately it samples at 12samples/sec = too slow for knock count.

I thought PorKen came up with a knock light. Not sure it's accuracy, but it might be the best tool given the circumstances.
Thanks for that info Andrew, didn't know the EZK was that tunable AND that progressive. I will stick to what I know best

Perhaps Imre and I could build one of these and use it to check for inaudible knocks.

http://autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=0353

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
The professional tuners I know disable knock sensors when tuning an engine (when possible, not all systems allow this).
If professional tuners disable the knock sensors, how do they tune to ensure there are no inaudible knocks? Do they disable the sensors from changing the timing and just use them to data log knock counts?
Old 02-10-2011, 11:39 AM
  #114  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cosmo Kramer
If professional tuners disable the knock sensors, how do they tune to ensure there are no inaudible knocks?
An experienced tuner knows how to find the limits and knock threshold of an engine long before the knock sensors pick anything up.

Everything from how the shape of the curve changes with various adjustments, to the smoothness of the run, logging hp/torque changes with every small adjustment etc....

I'm sure in a tuning forum this would be argued like oil threads, it's just the advice from Ben Strader when I took his EFI 101 class.

Watching a guy like Luke @ Beyond Redline really puts things in perspective and is why I don't tune my own car. Usually he tunes solo, he doesn't mind it when I'm in the passenger seat running the Shark Tuner. I don't question when he glances back and forth between 9-10 dyno runs overlayed and my maps in the ST and starts making fine adjustments. In between runs we also crank up the eddie brakes for some "rolling road" tuning. In a perfect world this is all you would do. Problem is heat, not only for the dyno but my last tuning day we had to take a break to allow my exhaust manifolds to recover from the bright pink color they turned. It takes a lot of fans to simulate 100+mph down the highway.

$120 an hour? IMO that's a bargain for his experience and know how.

When Luke builds a 700 awhp Mitsu, there aren't any knock sensors.

Originally Posted by Cosmo Kramer
Do they disable the sensors from changing the timing and just use them to data log knock counts?
More of a precaution to keep them from interfering in case they are overly sensitive.

A while ago I read a story about someone tuning their engine. Instead of disabling the knock sensors he simply unplugged them. Bad idea since on most cars since this automatically dials in full retard. Once he had his tune dialed in and re-connected them, the maps he made were all multiplied by whatever factor those knock sensors adjust for. I'm sure this isn't the case with every car, just an interesting story.

I've seen the aftermath of too many engines destroyed from a bad tune. The blame game always points to something else....too much boost, bad gas, faulty injector, hot day, I wore brown shoes......never the tune. But when you look at the details and break down the data (or lack thereof) a bad tune is high on the fault list.
Old 02-10-2011, 02:46 PM
  #115  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I know Carl started out with a Powerdyne supercharger that had an internal drive belt on his track car. It kept breaking those internal belts when he increased the boost, and he ended up switching to a model of supercharger with internal gears on that car
Dont confuse development work with production parts, please. As you stated, this was on a) my car, and b) racing. Thats how we learned what a Powerdyne could and could not do. I had to know what pulley combinations were best so I could recommend pulleys sizes to my customers.

Besides, your quoting something you saw in like 2005. We traveled a lot of ground since then.
Old 02-10-2011, 02:52 PM
  #116  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

For those of you that are unfamiliar with our Stage 2 kit for the Porsche 928:

Details are here: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/32v_stage2.php

A sample of the installation instructions for this kit is available for download as well.

Our kits are shipped complete, with every nut, bolt and washer needed.

Here are some pictures:
Attached Images       
Old 02-10-2011, 02:57 PM
  #117  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SQLGuy
Just to throw one other thing out there, has anyone done anything on a 928 with a Procharger unit? They sound like they combine a lot of the best of both the Vortech and Raptor:

Gear driven
Self contained oiling in many models
Three year warranty
High boost
Billet case and impeller
CW or CCW

Pricing doesn't sound unreasonable either.

Of course, this is mostly from their web site. Is there a downside to these units?
Todd up in Green Bay has a Procharger on his red car. It uses straight cut gears and is pretty loud. Here are a couple of threads on the car:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ler-30psi.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...tercooler.html

Originally Posted by blown 87
For me, I would much rather have one that is not self contained.

My D1 Procharger on my corvette has around 80,000 miles on it, nary a problem.
The Vortech superchargers that Tim used in the kits before the current ones did not have the self contained oiling system. The self contained oiling superchargers provide for a little easier installation, and look a little cleaner because of not having the oil supply and drain lines. I'm sure that if somebody wanted a kit using one of the external oiling supercharger models, it wouldn't be a problem to get one of those instead of a self contained oiling model. The brackets and everything else used is the same, so it would just be a matter of substituting one model of supercharger for the other, and providing the oil line parts. The external oiling supply models also use the helical cut gears, so are quiet like the self contained oiling models are.

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
I've seen the aftermath of too many engines destroyed from a bad tune. The blame game always points to something else....too much boost, bad gas, faulty injector, hot day, I wore brown shoes......never the tune. But when you look at the details and break down the data (or lack thereof) a bad tune is high on the fault list.
"detonation is the first thing you should suspect when stress related component failure occurs!" - Smokey Yunick
Old 02-10-2011, 03:10 PM
  #118  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default The 928 Motorsports Stage III kit

I finished development of our Stage 3 kit several months ago, but have not posted about it.

The hold-up has been the supercharger head unit. Our Stage 3 kit is designed for modified 5.0L, 5.4L and 6.0 Liter motors. Because of this, we specified a larger supercharger than what we offer in our Stage 1 and 2 kits at present.

The supercharger has been a collaborative effort with Raptor to make up the 1200 CFM that we want in the package we need. The new Raptor is built around our patented impeller (more on our performance impeller can be read about here: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/...neimpeller.php

But, the monsoon and flodding in Australia has hampered the manufacturing of these units for the time being.

I will post when I have a supply of parts, and final dyno results.

Here is what the finished Stage III kit looks like:
Attached Images     
Old 02-10-2011, 03:38 PM
  #119  
Z
Rennlist Member
 
Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
Dont confuse development work with production parts, please. As you stated, this was on a) my car, and b) racing. Thats how we learned what a Powerdyne could and could not do. I had to know what pulley combinations were best so I could recommend pulleys sizes to my customers.

Besides, your quoting something you saw in like 2005. We traveled a lot of ground since then.
Has it been that long already? I know that Powerdyne went out of business since then. The most recent pictures of your race car, with the stroker engine and new intake on it, show that it still has a gear driven supercharger on it. I do see that you have one of the Raptor superchargers on your GT that's pictured earlier post though. I see that those pictures are from back before you put the Electromotive engine management system on that car, which was a good while ago already. It's amazing how time has just flown by.

The new stage-3 sounds interesting. I see that the post above mentioning it does show the Electromotive engine management system being on your car. Is the Electromotive system going to be part of the stage-3 setup?
Old 02-10-2011, 03:44 PM
  #120  
928mac
Drifting
 
928mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Hey Z that is post 928


Quick Reply: Surcharger kit recommendation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:17 PM.