93 GTS 5 Speed for sale
#16
Drifting
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: an unnatural suburban habitat
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Comments bad mouthing GTS's are always from people who don't own them but SURE DO WANT TO!
And can you blame a 928 owner for wanting a GTS! Best of the breed (despite a bit of oil use)! Only 400 imported and FAR less than that on the road today! Nearly as rare as hens teeth and everyone thinks they are some brand new Porsche they just haven't seen yet!
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Sorry, didn't mean it that way. As a former motorcycle racer I do see things differently. As we know the GTS should have been 6 speed, 6.0 liters with variocam... And a dry sump. Porsche fell short handicapping the 928 with the 2/6 rod bearing issue on 5 liter motors, the early GTS rods, and oiling issues. The 911s have always had some flaws too though through the years. 996 intermediate shaft???...
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry, didn't mean it that way. As a former motorcycle racer I do see things differently. As we know the GTS should have been 6 speed, 6.0 liters with variocam... And a dry sump. Porsche fell short handicapping the 928 with the 2/6 rod bearing issue on 5 liter motors, the early GTS rods, and oiling issues. The 911s have always had some flaws too though through the years. 996 intermediate shaft???...
Again you bring up rods and oiling issues on the GTS. We know there are a number that suffered from this but I would not consider it a blanket issue afflicting all 93's. there are a large number out there that have not had engine work that do not have oiling issues. I can't say for sure my engine doesn't have bent rods without breaking down the motor. Although I doubt it does, The car dynos like it is factory new and there is no balancing issues that i would expect if it had issues. I would say that there are more sound 93's on the road than there are suffering from these problems although they are concerns a buyer should be aware of when purchasing one.
I don't think there is a Porsche that doesn't have some ghost story that someone wants to harp on. The early 911's with the magnesium cases and no galvanizing, the 70's 911's with magnesium intermediate plates, The SC with the original Rubber center clutch disc, the 924 with the fuel injection issues and head gaskets, the early 944 with cam issues, the early 928 with electrical gremlins, early 964's with no head gaskets and bad DMF. The 996 with RMS issues not to mention the 3.4 liter engine, etc, etc.
This is part of Porsche ownership, yet there are many here that continue to buy them and time has proven they hold there value.
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
968 6sp gearbox uses many same and similar components to Audi 6sp boxes. It was planned to be used in mass market cars.
#19
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche did put $$$$$ for 6sp. They ordered it from Getrag which could not delived strong enough box on time and on budget before GTS launch. Oil pump setup and other updates compared to GT box used in 5sp GTS was quickly developed when it was obvious 6sp would not happen.
968 6sp gearbox uses many same and similar components to Audi 6sp boxes. It was planned to be used in mass market cars.
968 6sp gearbox uses many same and similar components to Audi 6sp boxes. It was planned to be used in mass market cars.
I am not sure what would be gained by the 6 speed other than fuel economy. I for one prefer the 5 speed of my 964's over the 6 speeds of the 993's. gearing was better and well suited for spirited driving. gas mileage sucks but I find performance to be better and I don't bounce off the rev limiters like the 993TT guys do all the time due to the shorter gearing. I find the 5 speed to be perfect for the GTS's application. Driving in traffic is much easier with the longer gears and a 6 speed would make it much less enjoyable. It also requires less shifting for highway cruising. But that is my opinion.
#20
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry a habit i will never break and have lived by since the 70's, sacrificial oil is worth the peace of mind. I used to be more **** and it was once a year or every 2000 miles whichever came first. I did the same with my turbo. Now it is just once a year and whatever miles. I usually don't put more than 2500 miles a year 3000 tops. The 964 C2 gets it's oil changed every 1800-2000 track miles so roughly 3 times a season. Although I go by a '1 track mile is equivalent to 3 street miles' approach. The turbo and C2 take 12 quarts per change. So the 928 is cheap in comparison.
It might be crazy waste of money to some. But it is a habit I got into driving 911's for so many years. The earlier 911's used a copper dry sump tank and the acids and condensation in the oil from sitting over the winter would eat away at the tank. I also flush all fluids every 2 years whether the car is driven or it is needed or not.
I know there is no reason to maintain these intervals any longer and I am less concerned about my Cayenne which recommends a 12k mile interval but I change it every 6-8000, just a habit i will always live by I guess.
If you think I am crazy the original owner of my GTS changed the oil every 750 miles. He owned the car until it had 42k miles on the odo.
One thing I like to check for with oil changes is evidence of any metal or internal damage. Something I have always preferred to do at least once a year.
It might be crazy waste of money to some. But it is a habit I got into driving 911's for so many years. The earlier 911's used a copper dry sump tank and the acids and condensation in the oil from sitting over the winter would eat away at the tank. I also flush all fluids every 2 years whether the car is driven or it is needed or not.
I know there is no reason to maintain these intervals any longer and I am less concerned about my Cayenne which recommends a 12k mile interval but I change it every 6-8000, just a habit i will always live by I guess.
If you think I am crazy the original owner of my GTS changed the oil every 750 miles. He owned the car until it had 42k miles on the odo.
One thing I like to check for with oil changes is evidence of any metal or internal damage. Something I have always preferred to do at least once a year.
I think I know what you would do.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#21
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Confused](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Pushing it a bit huh. Sorry CFL's still have a long way to go. too expensive for dim able versions in the color range i use.
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#23
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington "Dc"
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#24
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So this was planned for before the GTS was launched but once in production they kept the modified 5 speed? Do we have any idea what the budget was set at? I can only assume it was not a large budget considering the path was pretty much drawn for this car by the time the GTS was released.
After that it was decided that 5.4L 100mm bore engine will have to do. 6sp was still planned. It had max design tq of 400 lb-ft in case 6L engine would make return later. 5th would be direct and 6th similar setup as in Getrag 286 which I believe means gearbox used in BMW 850. Later, stronger version of 286 was used in 850 CSi, Nissan Skyline R34 and Toyota Supra MkIV. Its one of the srongest fully syncronized 6sp street gearbox done ever. 1st and 2nd have three ring syncros while 3rd and 4th has two ring. 5th, 6th and R are single ring setup like all six gears in GTS.
Work on 6sp was stopped in '91 when it became clear more stronger bearings and thus more $ would be needed to make box strong enough. G28/55 -> G28/57 upgrade project was started at same time to get at least 5sp which is strong enough for 369 lb-ft.
I am not sure what would be gained by the 6 speed other than fuel economy. I for one prefer the 5 speed of my 964's over the 6 speeds of the 993's. gearing was better and well suited for spirited driving. gas mileage sucks but I find performance to be better and I don't bounce off the rev limiters like the 993TT guys do all the time due to the shorter gearing. I find the 5 speed to be perfect for the GTS's application. Driving in traffic is much easier with the longer gears and a 6 speed would make it much less enjoyable. It also requires less shifting for highway cruising. But that is my opinion.
#25
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
This car looks very nice. One day I'll get a manual GTS, either with no sunroof, or have the roof cut off and replaced with a no-sunroof one.
#26
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
4sp automatic TT outer tube, custom center shaft inside it and 4sp automatic diff housing. 6sp gearbox mounted between them. Thats the plan. I'll email you in next few days about other stuff and can give little more details about this project also.
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My Amazon Green '93 GTS just turned 55K miles - I'm the original owner so no unknowns. I don't have any oil burn problems and the engine runs great. My "new car. My '87 daily driver turned 133K miles and sees the bugs and rock chips.