Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

93 GTS 5 Speed for sale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2010, 05:51 PM
  #16  
Ispeed
Drifting
 
Ispeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: an unnatural suburban habitat
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
Comments bad mouthing GTS's are always from people who don't own them but SURE DO WANT TO! And can you blame a 928 owner for wanting a GTS! Best of the breed (despite a bit of oil use)! Only 400 imported and FAR less than that on the road today! Nearly as rare as hens teeth and everyone thinks they are some brand new Porsche they just haven't seen yet!

Sorry, didn't mean it that way. As a former motorcycle racer I do see things differently. As we know the GTS should have been 6 speed, 6.0 liters with variocam... And a dry sump. Porsche fell short handicapping the 928 with the 2/6 rod bearing issue on 5 liter motors, the early GTS rods, and oiling issues. The 911s have always had some flaws too though through the years. 996 intermediate shaft???...
Old 06-03-2010, 11:02 AM
  #17  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,379
Received 2,053 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928andRC51
Sorry, didn't mean it that way. As a former motorcycle racer I do see things differently. As we know the GTS should have been 6 speed, 6.0 liters with variocam... And a dry sump. Porsche fell short handicapping the 928 with the 2/6 rod bearing issue on 5 liter motors, the early GTS rods, and oiling issues. The 911s have always had some flaws too though through the years. 996 intermediate shaft???...
Well i doubt Porsche would have put the time and money into a 6 speed for a car that had such few sales. The 968 did receive a 6 speed albeit they produced thousands vs hundreds and it was one of the first cars to ever receive a 6 speed. If you take that approach why didn't Porsche offer a tiptronic version of the 928 vs the auto tranny. We also know that making the GTS a 6.0 liter would have required entirely new tooling and castings for the block, Again hard to justify considering the company was on the verge of bankruptcy at the time and sales for these cars were way off.

Again you bring up rods and oiling issues on the GTS. We know there are a number that suffered from this but I would not consider it a blanket issue afflicting all 93's. there are a large number out there that have not had engine work that do not have oiling issues. I can't say for sure my engine doesn't have bent rods without breaking down the motor. Although I doubt it does, The car dynos like it is factory new and there is no balancing issues that i would expect if it had issues. I would say that there are more sound 93's on the road than there are suffering from these problems although they are concerns a buyer should be aware of when purchasing one.

I don't think there is a Porsche that doesn't have some ghost story that someone wants to harp on. The early 911's with the magnesium cases and no galvanizing, the 70's 911's with magnesium intermediate plates, The SC with the original Rubber center clutch disc, the 924 with the fuel injection issues and head gaskets, the early 944 with cam issues, the early 928 with electrical gremlins, early 964's with no head gaskets and bad DMF. The 996 with RMS issues not to mention the 3.4 liter engine, etc, etc.

This is part of Porsche ownership, yet there are many here that continue to buy them and time has proven they hold there value.
Old 06-03-2010, 11:17 AM
  #18  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
Well i doubt Porsche would have put the time and money into a 6 speed for a car that had such few sales.
Porsche did put $$$$$ for 6sp. They ordered it from Getrag which could not delived strong enough box on time and on budget before GTS launch. Oil pump setup and other updates compared to GT box used in 5sp GTS was quickly developed when it was obvious 6sp would not happen.

968 6sp gearbox uses many same and similar components to Audi 6sp boxes. It was planned to be used in mass market cars.
Old 06-03-2010, 11:31 AM
  #19  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,379
Received 2,053 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
Porsche did put $$$$$ for 6sp. They ordered it from Getrag which could not delived strong enough box on time and on budget before GTS launch. Oil pump setup and other updates compared to GT box used in 5sp GTS was quickly developed when it was obvious 6sp would not happen.

968 6sp gearbox uses many same and similar components to Audi 6sp boxes. It was planned to be used in mass market cars.
So this was planned for before the GTS was launched but once in production they kept the modified 5 speed? Do we have any idea what the budget was set at? I can only assume it was not a large budget considering the path was pretty much drawn for this car by the time the GTS was released.

I am not sure what would be gained by the 6 speed other than fuel economy. I for one prefer the 5 speed of my 964's over the 6 speeds of the 993's. gearing was better and well suited for spirited driving. gas mileage sucks but I find performance to be better and I don't bounce off the rev limiters like the 993TT guys do all the time due to the shorter gearing. I find the 5 speed to be perfect for the GTS's application. Driving in traffic is much easier with the longer gears and a 6 speed would make it much less enjoyable. It also requires less shifting for highway cruising. But that is my opinion.
Old 06-03-2010, 12:56 PM
  #20  
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Randy V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Insane Diego, California
Posts: 40,449
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
Sorry a habit i will never break and have lived by since the 70's, sacrificial oil is worth the peace of mind. I used to be more **** and it was once a year or every 2000 miles whichever came first. I did the same with my turbo. Now it is just once a year and whatever miles. I usually don't put more than 2500 miles a year 3000 tops. The 964 C2 gets it's oil changed every 1800-2000 track miles so roughly 3 times a season. Although I go by a '1 track mile is equivalent to 3 street miles' approach. The turbo and C2 take 12 quarts per change. So the 928 is cheap in comparison.

It might be crazy waste of money to some. But it is a habit I got into driving 911's for so many years. The earlier 911's used a copper dry sump tank and the acids and condensation in the oil from sitting over the winter would eat away at the tank. I also flush all fluids every 2 years whether the car is driven or it is needed or not.

I know there is no reason to maintain these intervals any longer and I am less concerned about my Cayenne which recommends a 12k mile interval but I change it every 6-8000, just a habit i will always live by I guess.

If you think I am crazy the original owner of my GTS changed the oil every 750 miles. He owned the car until it had 42k miles on the odo.

One thing I like to check for with oil changes is evidence of any metal or internal damage. Something I have always preferred to do at least once a year.
Along those same lines, I used to change incandescent light bulbs a few times a year, but after replacing them with CFLs I'm wondering if I should still change them as frequently.

I think I know what you would do.

Old 06-03-2010, 01:16 PM
  #21  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,379
Received 2,053 Likes on 1,233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Randy V
Along those same lines, I used to change incandescent light bulbs a few times a year, but after replacing them with CFLs I'm wondering if I should still change them as frequently.

I think I know what you would do.



Pushing it a bit huh. Sorry CFL's still have a long way to go. too expensive for dim able versions in the color range i use.
Old 06-03-2010, 04:39 PM
  #22  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

very nice....sport seats, 5 speed and a nice color combo with decent mileage for a good price.....great find for someone
Old 06-03-2010, 04:44 PM
  #23  
dcrasta
Three Wheelin'
 
dcrasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington "Dc"
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aaddpp
Every time I see these cars (S to GTS...it doesn't matter which) I am amazed at how well the shape has stood up to time, and never seems to look dated - no other car I know of has pulled this off as well.

Sweet GTS...wish I had the space!!!
They remind me of shark footage when the shark 'rolls his eye' just before the bite. Some very evil/mean about these cars from the front, and a bit obnoxious / snobby from the back, Perfect
Old 06-03-2010, 06:51 PM
  #24  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cobalt
So this was planned for before the GTS was launched but once in production they kept the modified 5 speed? Do we have any idea what the budget was set at? I can only assume it was not a large budget considering the path was pretty much drawn for this car by the time the GTS was released.
6sp design was originally done in '87-88. At same time also 6L engine and some more radical than GTS design changes were also planned. Money was needed elsewhere so project was given only around $11 million more to spend in late '88. When things started to look bad and sales slowed down project was stoped altogether for a while in '89.

After that it was decided that 5.4L 100mm bore engine will have to do. 6sp was still planned. It had max design tq of 400 lb-ft in case 6L engine would make return later. 5th would be direct and 6th similar setup as in Getrag 286 which I believe means gearbox used in BMW 850. Later, stronger version of 286 was used in 850 CSi, Nissan Skyline R34 and Toyota Supra MkIV. Its one of the srongest fully syncronized 6sp street gearbox done ever. 1st and 2nd have three ring syncros while 3rd and 4th has two ring. 5th, 6th and R are single ring setup like all six gears in GTS.

Work on 6sp was stopped in '91 when it became clear more stronger bearings and thus more $ would be needed to make box strong enough. G28/55 -> G28/57 upgrade project was started at same time to get at least 5sp which is strong enough for 369 lb-ft.

I am not sure what would be gained by the 6 speed other than fuel economy. I for one prefer the 5 speed of my 964's over the 6 speeds of the 993's. gearing was better and well suited for spirited driving. gas mileage sucks but I find performance to be better and I don't bounce off the rev limiters like the 993TT guys do all the time due to the shorter gearing. I find the 5 speed to be perfect for the GTS's application. Driving in traffic is much easier with the longer gears and a 6 speed would make it much less enjoyable. It also requires less shifting for highway cruising. But that is my opinion.
I would love to have one more highway gear on top of 5th on manual box. Lower gears could remain as they are. On fast autobahn driving engine revs way too high. Its not needed as there is plenty of tq at low down to move it. My automatic GTS got 2.20:1 US S4 ring and pinion during winter for just that. Lower gears will move up a little also but I can live with it. On 5sp having one more gear on top would be perfect. One day green GTS and few other 928 will have such setup using automatic GTS diff and certain 6sp gearbox. Its lot of work to get factory quality setup which will for example retain PSD but I believe we can eventually pull it off locally. So far there has been too many other things to do but we have workable plan down to fairly detailed level what needs to be done.
Old 06-03-2010, 07:09 PM
  #25  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,280
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vilhuer
I would love to have one more highway gear on top of 5th on manual box. Lower gears could remain as they are. On fast autobahn driving engine revs way too high.
+1 - freeway speeds at 3500rpm is just unnecessary, especially after a 4-hour trip. More details on the 6-speed project would be awesome, in another thread

This car looks very nice. One day I'll get a manual GTS, either with no sunroof, or have the roof cut off and replaced with a no-sunroof one.
Old 06-03-2010, 07:20 PM
  #26  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

4sp automatic TT outer tube, custom center shaft inside it and 4sp automatic diff housing. 6sp gearbox mounted between them. Thats the plan. I'll email you in next few days about other stuff and can give little more details about this project also.
Old 06-04-2010, 05:38 AM
  #27  
Rich9928p
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Rich9928p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

My Amazon Green '93 GTS just turned 55K miles - I'm the original owner so no unknowns. I don't have any oil burn problems and the engine runs great. My "new car. My '87 daily driver turned 133K miles and sees the bugs and rock chips.



Quick Reply: 93 GTS 5 Speed for sale



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:25 AM.