Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Louis Ott's full valve cover video now on youtube

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2010, 09:14 PM
  #136  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
I get irritated by snake-oil salesmen, especially by ones that initially fooled me.
Nope -- I just had the temerity to disagree with you. Shame on me.


Originally Posted by ptuomov
Kevin initially measured the 0.58g lateral acceleration figure by assuming that the pan is not bolted to the girdle in a race car. That's where the non-sensical 0.58g comes from. (A strong alternative for the source of this figure is that he just made it up.) You should pay zero attention to it.
Hey guy, you've got a few 928 engines. I don't see you attempting to replicate any of this. Oh yeah -- you measured the oil pump. So did I and my figures were just about dead on with factory specs. Yours were about 25% high.

Man, you've really got some brass ones.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Then, when he repeated the measurements with pan walls extended, simulating the girdle, he couldn't get the pickup to uncover at a low enough side angle / lateral g force. So he started tilting the pan backwards as well. (Or he again made all the numbers up.)
Nope -- I really did intend to measure the diagonal from the start.

Ok, I remade the dam. The initial tests which I posted and where I fully acknowledged that they did not represent perfection gave an angle of 30 degrees. I did the test just now with the extended wall twice and got 34 degrees the first time and 37 degrees the second time, averaging to 35.5 degrees or ~.71 g. In the new 928 book by Long, he cites period wetweather street tires returning .76G (Dunlop) or .81G (Pirelli)


Originally Posted by ptuomov
Tilting the pan backwards corresponds to forward acceleration. Well, the edge of the pickup will uncover below 1g of forward acceleration. Furthermore, given the shape of the gridle and the pan, the critical forward acceleration g-force / backward tilt angle is not very sensitive to the amount of oil in the pan. This is however irrelevant for explaining the survival of stock or near stock 928s, because none of the cars mentioned in this thread can sustain anywhere near 1g forward acceleration for any meaningful periof of time.
Wow -- you really need to go back over those biased angles I gave -- nowhere near 1G of forward acceleration is required. This is where you actually need to do the lab assignment, Tuomo. I will give you a hint -- the water leaks out heavily at the corner of the sump.


Originally Posted by ptuomov
So some more smoke and mirrors from Kevin. Let's see how many bottles of aeration snake oil this obfuscation effort sold.
Nope -- I am backing up what I say. Over on the other thread you ask about whether stock B16 Honda rods are piston guided. Yikes. Firstly, you are not thinking too clearly. All the information to answer that was present in the thread and the picture. Second, why don't YOU open up a few hundred engines and start looking at and presenting the technology. BIG TALK on internet forums is cheap.

Correct me if I am wrong -- was I the first person on the Rennlist EVER to notice the deaerator in the early pump and say something about it?

Correct me if I am wrong -- empirical testing shows the product I made for the 928 over four years ago works very well. You're right at didley squat with what you've developed. Like I said, BIG TALK on internet forums is cheap.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Why don't you shed some light on your theory of how oil aeration is necessary for keeping the 928 pickup covered? I mean, this has already turned into a comedy routine, so why not blow it off in the end with the biggest joke!

"Aeration -- the source of and solution to all of lifes problems." (Adapted from Homer Simpson.)
Tuomo, with your extraordinary education level, you're the joke in what you're doing here. The sad thing is that some people may take you seriously.
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:10 PM
  #137  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Nope -- I really did intend to measure the diagonal from the start.

Ok, I remade the dam. The initial tests which I posted and where I fully acknowledged that they did not represent perfection gave an angle of 30 degrees. I did the test just now with the extended wall twice and got 34 degrees the first time and 37 degrees the second time, averaging to 35.5 degrees or ~.71 g. In the new 928 book by Long, he cites period wetweather street tires returning .76G (Dunlop) or .81G (Pirelli)
That's on page 75 of the printed version of the book. It says "The Dunlop tyres lacked the wet weather performance and the ultimate level of grip of the Pirellis (0.76g on the skidpan against 0.81g), but their more forgiving sidewall certainly enhanced refinement, especially on rougher patches of road." The "skidpan" is likely a typo and should read "skidpad."

According to "How to Make Your Car Handle" By Fred Puhn, skidpad measures the lateral acceleration and steady-state cornering ability of the car. Not exactly news to most of us, but wanted to give you a source for this claim.

In other words, the above g figures you quoted correspond to lateral acceleration and tilting the pan sideways. Not diagonally. Yet you compare this figure to a diagonal tilt and diagonal g-force, I suspect fully knowing that you are comparing apples and oranges.

...let's review... you were caught with a lie again! You took a lateral g-force measurement and then compared it to your diagonal tilt of the pan! Almost every fact I check in your posts turns out to be made up or misrepresented!

As Frank Williams said about Ferrari being caught spying his team: "Disappointing, but not terribly surprising."

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Correct me if I am wrong -- empirical testing shows the product I made for the 928 over four years ago works very well. You're right at didley squat with what you've developed. Like I said, BIG TALK on internet forums is cheap. Tuomo, with your extraordinary education level, you're the joke in what you're doing here. The sad thing is that some people may take you seriously.
What I say is not going to cause you to lose credibility, because as you correctly point out I am complete nobody. Me being a hobbyist nobody is known to pretty much everyone here. But your problem is bigger than me and my writings. You are losing credibility not because of what I say but because of what you say.
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:28 PM
  #138  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,280
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Man alive... who pissed in your corn flakes?

Tuomo's posting history is hardly combatative - in fact he goes out of his way to avoid it usually.

Gents - this argument is providing some very good reading and insight into how oiling and the pickup work.. please fight the arguments, not the person, as we'd hate to lose this thread to the abyss!
Hilton is offline  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:41 PM
  #139  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Hey guy, you've got a few 928 engines. I don't see you attempting to replicate any of this. Oh yeah -- you measured the oil pump. So did I and my figures were just about dead on with factory specs. Yours were about 25% high.

Man, you've really got some brass ones.
So you are implying that I am "replicating" your pump measurements? And then you say that I was off by 25% while you were just about "dead on" on with the factory specs?

Let's review.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
27.7 gallons per minute @ 7000 rpm displacement of the pump leads me to another point.
Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Ok, I pulled the pump on my early motor and measured the three trapezoids that combine to form the volume displaced per revolution in the Gerotor.

So, 2.1697 gallons per minute at 7000 rpm. Or 8.6792 quarts per minute, approximately.

Edit: I see the problem. There are 10 chamber transfers per revolution of the rotor. So, 21.697 gallons per minute. Thought I was losing my mind there.
Who's got the brass ***** again? You were initially off by a factor of ten! And then you have the audacity to complain about my measurement error?! Can't make this stuff up.

Some outsider should quote us the factory spec for the pump capacity at 7000 rpm. Let's see if you hit it with your 2.17 - 21.7 gpm range.

There's also the minor detail that at least the 928 pumps that I've seen are not gerotor pumps, instead they are internal gear pumps. Does there really exist a gerotor (as in GEnerater ROTOR) 928 pump? One wonders if this is also BS.
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 02:28 AM
  #140  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hilton
Tuomo's posting history is hardly combatative - in fact he goes out of his way to avoid it usually.

Gents - this argument is providing some very good reading and insight into how oiling and the pickup work.. please fight the arguments, not the person, as we'd hate to lose this thread to the abyss!
Yes, you're correct. My tendency to attack is well known. Again, it is the principal reason I did not go into teaching: I did not want to damage young minds. I remember talking to the chair of the department and saying to the effect that it is horrible how one often becomes that which he detests.
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 03:26 AM
  #141  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, took a quick timeout and have some coffee brewing. Elixir des Lebens.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
So you are implying that I am "replicating" your pump measurements? And then you say that I was off by 25% while you were just about "dead on" on with the factory specs?
No, I was attempting to replicate your measurements. Check the timeline. I was very -- extremely -- open with my investigation and calculations and wrote them down as posts here and on speedtalk as I performed them. As I discovered interesting details about the pump I posted them as well.

When there is information that is important to me I try my best to check it out firsthand. It is why the interior of our home is populated by a very large amount of parts for many types of engines. Samantha is very understanding about that. The shop, her garage, a dedicated storage shed and rented storage space are also filled. The county just came after me because our yard has what I will call an excessive number of engine blocks in it. Two more are to be delivered later today. Samantha said that I should call them works of art and how could people object to works of art displayed on the lawn? The other chair in the office here has a Formula Ford block sitting on it. Sigh. I digress too much.


Originally Posted by ptuomov
There's also the minor detail that at least the 928 pumps that I've seen are not gerotor pumps, instead they are internal gear pumps. Does there really exist a gerotor (as in GEnerater ROTOR) 928 pump? One wonders if this is also BS.
The first thing I did after posting was to do a patent search to see if Porsche was trying to protect the design. It doesn't seem to show up in the US database but Porsche often cites German and other origin patents. I wish I had the time to investigate that further.

A gerotor pump is a member of a subset of the general class of internal gear pumps. I looked at quite a few designs online and even saw where the vertical fin in the pump is an element sometimes used with viscous fluids. If you have one, note the clipped corner of that fin. I need to look into that someday.
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 07:19 AM
  #142  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
That's on page 75 of the printed version of the book. It says "The Dunlop tyres lacked the wet weather performance and the ultimate level of grip of the Pirellis (0.76g on the skidpan against 0.81g), but their more forgiving sidewall certainly enhanced refinement, especially on rougher patches of road." The "skidpan" is likely a typo and should read "skidpad."

According to "How to Make Your Car Handle" By Fred Puhn, skidpad measures the lateral acceleration and steady-state cornering ability of the car. Not exactly news to most of us, but wanted to give you a source for this claim.

In other words, the above g figures you quoted correspond to lateral acceleration and tilting the pan sideways. Not diagonally. Yet you compare this figure to a diagonal tilt and diagonal g-force, I suspect fully knowing that you are comparing apples and oranges.
Tuomo, here is an experiment I suggest you conduct.

Take an old turntable for records and a small clear plastic rectangular container. Fill the container about 1/4 of the way.

As you move the container to various positions with respect to the center and run the turntable, observe the container from the side.

The surface/edge of the water on the outside wall describes an arc or negative curve. As you shift the container back and forth you can see that there are positions where the bulk of the fluid ends up at the forward end, the rearward end or roughly balanced.

What this means is that the attitude of the car/engine with respect to the (often shifting) focus point of a curve/turn will determine where the majority of the oil flows.

Tilting the pan diagonally gives a rough representation of one possible attitude of the vehicle and flow bias of the oil. How the front and rear suspension is set up is critical even with a car approaching perfect front to rear balance like the 928. Even this experiment does not account for body roll, for example.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
...let's review... you were caught with a lie again!
No, you were caught assuming a bit too much.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
You took a lateral g-force measurement and then compared it to your diagonal tilt of the pan! Almost every fact I check in your posts turns out to be made up or misrepresented!

As Frank Williams said about Ferrari being caught spying his team: "Disappointing, but not terribly surprising."
I am very open about the information in my posts. I think what you are demonstrating is a confirmation bias towards anything negative that you can derive/interpret from that information.

Originally Posted by ptuomov
What I say is not going to cause you to lose credibility, because as you correctly point out I am complete nobody. Me being a hobbyist nobody is known to pretty much everyone here. But your problem is bigger than me and my writings. You are losing credibility not because of what I say but because of what you say.
You are hardly a complete nobody in any sense of the term and this is why I am holding you to a bit higher standard.

Now, moving on, racers may want to use the highly practical information I just presented. When you go onto the track, hook up a small video camera to record the movement of colored fluid (I suggest water) in a small clear plastic rectangular container that is oriented to be parallel to the engine. When you review the video and correlate it to the turns -- hopefully datalogging as well, you will be able to see a realtime model of how oil is moving in the engine due to lateral acceleration -- minus, of course, the major influence of the rotating assembly. It is one part of a complex situation.

I hope this is helpful to people.
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 10:33 AM
  #143  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
What this means is that the attitude of the car/engine with respect to the (often shifting) focus point of a curve/turn will determine where the majority of the oil flows. Tilting the pan diagonally gives a rough representation of one possible attitude of the vehicle and flow bias of the oil. How the front and rear suspension is set up is critical even with a car approaching perfect front to rear balance like the 928. Even this experiment does not account for body roll, for example.
Are you seriously claiming that your diagonal tilt experiment's g-force figures can be honestly compared to the lateral g-force figures from skidpad? They can't. Obfuscate, deny, make up new stuff, obfuscate, deny, make up new stuff.

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Now, moving on, racers may want to use the highly practical information I just presented.
You are not presenting information, you are presenting disinformation. You comparing the diagonal pan tilt g-forces to skidpad ratings is just one of many examples of disinformation that you have polluted this thread with.

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
When you go onto the track, hook up a small video camera to record the movement of colored fluid (I suggest water) in a small clear plastic rectangular container that is oriented to be parallel to the engine. When you review the video and correlate it to the turns -- hopefully datalogging as well, you will be able to see a realtime model of how oil is moving in the engine due to lateral acceleration -- minus, of course, the major influence of the rotating assembly. It is one part of a complex situation.
Since it's 2010, instead of doing that one should use DevToaster's Rev (http://www.devtoaster.com/products/rev/) or similar software to record the locations and g-forces. Yes, you can put the i-phone in a sleeve and tape it on the intake manifold. Is your asinine Rube Goldberg machine suggestion intended to sidetrack us in some way and cause us to lose time and energy?

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
I hope this is helpful to people.
It's not. You making stuff up and posting it here in an authoritative tone does not help people, it hurts people. Hopefully fewer now that you've been exposed as the bull**** artist that you are.
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 10:55 AM
  #144  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Ok, I pulled the pump on my early motor and measured the three trapezoids that combine to form the volume displaced per revolution in the Gerotor.
Originally Posted by ptuomov
There's also the minor detail that at least the 928 pumps that I've seen are not gerotor pumps, instead they are internal gear pumps. Does there really exist a gerotor (as in GEnerater ROTOR) 928 pump? One wonders if this is also BS.
Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
A gerotor pump is a member of a subset of the general class of internal gear pumps. I looked at quite a few designs online and even saw where the vertical fin in the pump is an element sometimes used with viscous fluids. If you have one, note the clipped corner of that fin. I need to look into that someday.
Obfuscation.

A simple question: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 12:38 PM
  #145  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Obfuscation.

A simple question: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
Tuomo, a bit earlier in the thread you were citing to me the reason why the gears were increased in height from 21mm to 23mm. In the picture that I have those words in the manual are sitting right next to a picture of a pump body with the gears next to it.

Your homework assignment is to make the effort to look up what a gerotor design can embody. You seemed very happy to explicate the term gerotor.

Best, Kevin
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:09 PM
  #146  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Are you seriously claiming that your diagonal tilt experiment's g-force figures can be honestly compared to the lateral g-force figures from skidpad? They can't. Obfuscate, deny, make up new stuff, obfuscate, deny, make up new stuff.
Tuomo, in another thread you are discussing with another member how a simple approximation can be used with respect to integrating the area under a curve.

Your homework assignment is to review that idea you had and then apply the general concept to the above.


Originally Posted by ptuomov
You are not presenting information, you are presenting disinformation. You comparing the diagonal pan tilt g-forces to skidpad ratings is just one of many examples of disinformation that you have polluted this thread with.
Tuomo, in the speedtalk threads on oil pressure in a crossdrilled crank you had difficulty shifting frames of reference in order to see a problem from a different perspective.

Your homework assignment is to work through how tilting the pan in one frame of reference can approximate the angle of repose (or more properly, the surface of repose).


Originally Posted by ptuomov
Since it's 2010, instead of doing that one should use DevToaster's Rev (http://www.devtoaster.com/products/rev/) or similar software to record the locations and g-forces. Yes, you can put the i-phone in a sleeve and tape it on the intake manifold. Is your asinine Rube Goldberg machine suggestion intended to sidetrack us in some way and cause us to lose time and energy?
I apologize -- I thought that I made it clear that data acquisition would be wonderful. I looked at the link and the device does not appear to offer the information on vehicle attitude through a turn -- simple lateral and forward acceleration data present an infinite inverse problem of possible solutions for same.

Ah, parsimony. Love it, hate it. Sometimes it is "simply" amazing how much information a "simple" device can convey. Product opportunity, people. Who can package the above in a sleek case and add some electronics for some added value?

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
I hope this is helpful to people.
Originally Posted by ptuomov
It's not. You making stuff up and posting it here in an authoritative tone does not help people, it hurts people. Hopefully fewer now that you've been exposed as the bull**** artist that you are.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, Tuomo.

Best, Kevin
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:13 PM
  #147  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Obfuscation. A simple question: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Tuomo, a bit earlier in the thread you were citing to me the reason why the gears were increased in height from 21mm to 23mm. In the picture that I have those words in the manual are sitting right next to a picture of a pump body with the gears next to it. Your homework assignment is to make the effort to look up what a gerotor design can embody. You seemed very happy to explicate the term gerotor.
I am sorry that my questions was unclear. Let me rephrase it in the clearest possible terms: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:23 PM
  #148  
Kevin Johnson
Racer
 
Kevin Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
I am sorry that my questions was unclear. Let me rephrase it in the clearest possible terms: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
I have uploaded the picture and text. You should be able to tell me the answer to this. This picture looks very similar to the pump I removed from my early engine.
Attached Images  
Kevin Johnson is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:26 PM
  #149  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
Tuomo, in the speedtalk threads on oil pressure in a crossdrilled crank you had difficulty shifting frames of reference in order to see a problem from a different perspective.
I am surprised that you would want to bring up those threads up here. In case people are interested, here they are:

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21630
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21471
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=205

The reason why I am surprised that you'd want to bring those threads up here is that they have lots examples of you making up stuff and of your overall depicable behavior.

Someone who'll read those thread will also see me being wrong about stuff in those threads, but that doesn't particularly bother me because I am often wrong.
ptuomov is offline  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:30 PM
  #150  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
I am sorry that my questions was unclear. Let me rephrase it in the clearest possible terms: Did Porsche 928 ever come from the factory with a gerotor oil pump?
Originally Posted by Kevin Johnson
I have uploaded the picture and text. You should be able to tell me the answer to this. This picture looks very similar to the pump I removed from my early engine.
I am fairly sure that the pump in the picture is an internal gear pump and not a gerotor pump. I am wondering what pump you've been measuring since you said that you measured a gerotor pump. Makes me wonder if you actually measured a pump or just made it all up.
ptuomov is offline  


Quick Reply: Louis Ott's full valve cover video now on youtube



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:32 PM.