Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

928 VS LEXUS SC400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2010, 11:22 PM
  #31  
Ispeed
Drifting
 
Ispeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: an unnatural suburban habitat
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sweet928
Are you guys serious? My mother drives a SC400. She's 70 years old. Nice car for driving to the mall. The SC is not even on my top 100 list of cars I would want to take on a high speed windy road run. This thread is blasphemy - comparing the SC to a 928. The 928 is the ultimate GT of all time - hands down. Surly there are some other great GT's that cost a lot more but that's the point of why the 928 is the best GT of all time. There is no other super car that is so rare, so sublime and so timeless that can be enjoyed for so little $$$. No one ever has, or ever will, yell out "nice car" as you drive by -- or come talk to you at a gas pump -- or tell you they always dreamed of having a SC400. No one will ever site the movies that SC400's have been in. You guys are making my eyes bleed reading this thread.
That says it all in a nutshell. Good man!
Old 04-25-2010, 03:15 AM
  #32  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slownrusty
the 928 in an amazing car but so is the SC300, especially with the 5 speed and the 2JZ turbo motor.
Just so we're clear, you're position is that if you take an SC300 and put another $8-$10k into it, you can finally meet or exceed the performance of a 24 year old German luxury car? The SC is a nice car, and I like them a lot, but if you debadge it, you'll have a hard time telling it apart from a Toyota Avalon. That doesn't happen in a 928.
Old 04-25-2010, 08:29 AM
  #33  
slownrusty
Rennlist Member
 
slownrusty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,875
Received 337 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
Stock for stock they're not comparable.

Not saying that either car isn't really nice but I wouldn't consider either of them in the same league as the 928.

I'm huge fan of the 300Z Turbo from the 90's. But if I was going to buy a Japanese car I would probably pick an RX7 or S2000. I already have one of the best GT's in existance.
Afshin - If you compare year for year and stock for stock the Turbo Zs were a fair bit ahead of the 928. In 1983 the stock 280ZX Turbo ran to 60mp/h in the 7sec (conservatively) much quicker than the same year 928 and also faster than the same year Corvette and Ferrari 328. Not really a fair comparison, your 1990 928GT to a Z car almost 10 years older.

Originally Posted by Richter12x2
Just so we're clear, you're position is that if you take an SC300 and put another $8-$10k into it, you can finally meet or exceed the performance of a 24 year old German luxury car? The SC is a nice car, and I like them a lot, but if you debadge it, you'll have a hard time telling it apart from a Toyota Avalon. That doesn't happen in a 928.
The 2JZ already comes stock in the SC300. A Turbo kit for this car is in $1500 range. The Avalon is a four door car based on the FWD Camry platform and shares nothing with the SC300 RWD 2 door Coupe platform which is based off the last generation Supra. Please get your facts straight before posting. If taking off the badges confuses you which is which, you should consider another hobby, these cars look nothing alike.
Old 04-25-2010, 09:06 AM
  #34  
shmark
Drifting
 
shmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I remember when the SC300/400 came out we were all blown away by the styling, it was so different from everything else back then. The designers actually used plaster-filled balloons to come up with the shape. Nowadays it's a little bland looking, but when it came out it was absolutely gorgeous. In that respect, the 928 has stood the test of time a lot better than the SC. Not the most beautiful car, but distinctive and still looks good. When Lexus came out with the SC430 it was WTF have they done, took a beautiful coupe and created a franken-car. ick. But still comparing a 928 and an SC just doesn't compute. Lux-coupe versus a GT, very different cars.
Old 04-25-2010, 02:21 PM
  #35  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Where can you buy a SC300 turbo kit for $1500? If this is true, I may have to consider another project car. A quick search online turned up $4-5K for a kit.

I leased a '95 SC300 for a few years. It was my first big purchase after graduating college. It was a great car, and I've often thought about buying another.
Old 04-25-2010, 06:37 PM
  #36  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slownrusty
The 2JZ already comes stock in the SC300. A Turbo kit for this car is in $1500 range. The Avalon is a four door car based on the FWD Camry platform and shares nothing with the SC300 RWD 2 door Coupe platform which is based off the last generation Supra. Please get your facts straight before posting. If taking off the badges confuses you which is which, you should consider another hobby, these cars look nothing alike.
All I know is that I got behind some Toyota a day or two ago that looked just like an SC300 from the rear. Maybe I'm confused on which model Toyota looks like a Lexus SC300, but that's because I didn't even give it a second look other than wondering if he'd leave the light fast enough that I could get around him. And I'm with you, I'd definitely consider another hobby before I'd consider trading in my Porsche for a Toyota with a gold badge on it that could be fast, someday.

Where can you buy a SC300 turbo kit for $1500? If this is true, I may have to consider another project car. A quick search online turned up $4-5K for a kit.
Then you're going to need some way to tune it, some ONE to tune it, and quite a bit of dyno time, after all that you'll end up with a car that no dealer and most mechanics won't be able to help you with if you get into trouble.
Old 04-25-2010, 07:58 PM
  #37  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slownrusty
Afshin - If you compare year for year and stock for stock the Turbo Zs were a fair bit ahead of the 928. In 1983 the stock 280ZX Turbo ran to 60mp/h in the 7sec (conservatively) much quicker than the same year 928 and also faster than the same year Corvette and Ferrari 328. Not really a fair comparison, your 1990 928GT to a Z car almost 10 years older.
The '83 stock 928S 0-60 was 6.5s everywhere in the world except the US market.

Remember, it was the 300hp motor known here on Rennlist as the "Euro S". It was actually introduced in 1980 with the same power/performance.

In '84, the 928S stock time dropped even further to 6.2 when they bumped the hp to 310 and added LH-jet.

Last edited by Hilton; 04-25-2010 at 08:36 PM.
Old 04-25-2010, 08:34 PM
  #38  
john bono
Rennlist Member
 
john bono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slownrusty
Afshin - If you compare year for year and stock for stock the Turbo Zs were a fair bit ahead of the 928. In 1983 the stock 280ZX Turbo ran to 60mp/h in the 7sec (conservatively) much quicker than the same year 928 and also faster than the same year Corvette and Ferrari 328. Not really a fair comparison, your 1990 928GT to a Z car almost 10 years older.
Maybe an auto 928. Auto 928s are dogs from a dig, which is what 0-60 measures. A stick would be a much closer race 0-60. By the end of the 1/4, a 928 is going to catch the 280zx(and at a significantly higher trap speed). And after the quarter, it's game over for the z. All he's going to see are the 928's taillights.
Old 04-25-2010, 09:13 PM
  #39  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A PT Cruiser Turbo gets 6.7s 0-60. That doesn't make it equivalent to a 928, either.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:51 AM
  #40  
EspritS4s
Rennlist Member
 
EspritS4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,095
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Big deal, I'm used to driving cars that no dealer and most mechanics aren't able to help me with if I get into trouble In fact, I've got three of them right now and that's not including the Lotus.

**********************
"Then you're going to need some way to tune it, some ONE to tune it, and quite a bit of dyno time, after all that you'll end up with a car that no dealer and most mechanics won't be able to help you with if you get into trouble."
Old 04-26-2010, 11:36 AM
  #41  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Having a car that no dealer or mechanic can help me with is a *bonus* for me I also like tuning it and playing around with it, and no it didn't require any dyno time. And it's still my DD too.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 04-26-2010, 12:22 PM
  #42  
Richter12x2
Racer
 
Richter12x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not saying it's bad, I'm just putting it out there for consideration. For example, adding a turbo for a car not designed to come with one usually involves lower compression pistons, or you're going to be at increased risk for detonation. Since it's computer controlled, in order to tune it down, you're either going to have to have a custom chip burned, or you'll need to go standalone. If you go standalone, you're going to make sure you know the parameters you need to tune the engine.
Or you hack it together with a rising rate fuel pressure regulator or bigger injectors and a hacked MAF and hope it runs well enough that you can drive it.
People do it all the time, but it's something you need to consider before you get into something like this. I think an LS1 in a Miata would be a lot more fun, personally.
Old 04-26-2010, 07:13 PM
  #43  
axis of evil
Instructor
 
axis of evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dprantl
Having a car that no dealer or mechanic can help me with is a *bonus* for me I also like tuning it and playing around with it, and no it didn't require any dyno time. And it's still my DD too.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
You got it. That's what a hobby is all about.
I would not like to own a 928, or advise anyone to buy one, if mechanical knowledge was restricted to checking the oil and water,(You would have to have unlimited funds and total faith in the repair industry- sitting duck.)
Best rule in buying/owning any high performance or exotic, If you don't know how to maintain/fix/ or even modify, don't buy it. You don't need the dramas, and you will run out of money real fast.
Back to Lexus V 928, Not sure if it was ever available in the States but there was a 1JZ 2.5 litre twin turbo version available in Japan, much quicker than the V8 version, it got even better post 1996 when they went to a single turbo and Vvti.
the 2.5litre in this form was a much quicker revver than the 2J TT,with max torque at 2400RPM, a beast.
The body, would never win a beauty contest if it was parked next to a 928, Toyota has built some magic performance engines, pity they were always dumped into such boring looking cars.



Quick Reply: 928 VS LEXUS SC400



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:50 AM.