Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

16v Upgrades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2010, 05:28 PM
  #16  
chewy8000
Pro
 
chewy8000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm with hacker on this. I am in the middle of turning my 16V into a monster. I enjoy the lower complexity of my 16V over the 32V and the fact that people are almost giving away 4.5L motors. A plus for someone like me who will tinker and tune it forever. Yes it would be significantly less to just buy a 32V but what fun would that be?
Old 04-15-2010, 05:44 PM
  #17  
robot808
Rennlist Member
 
robot808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

To be perfectly clear, I am not really arguing anything. I have a 16V and love it. I am not asking Hacker how much he spent to gauge the value of his car either.
My 16V car is in pieces right now, trying to eek out a couple of HP. It seems that the easiest path to
300+ HP might be trading it in though.
Hackers car I think of as an exception, not the rule. I have been dying to get up and meet those guys. I would love if Tim would build me the next 16V SC, but I doubt he would, and I know I don't have the scratch anyway.
Old 04-15-2010, 06:06 PM
  #18  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
There is an L-Jet to Megasquirt conversion in FL. If you want one wired up for your L-Jet let me know. I can put you in contact with the guy who did the wiring.
Thanks Fabio. I need to acquire a few bits first.
Old 04-15-2010, 07:13 PM
  #19  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The hole I see in the sell the OB and buy a 32v tale, is that it might be easier to rebuild the OB the way you want than to sell it at a good price and find and buy a nice 32v. Some of us really HATE the process of selling a car.

The lure of more HP is seductive, but its very important that you know what you actually want before taking too big of a leap. All well running 928's are a pleasure to drive. If your not happy, look carefully at the why, so you don't buy a super charger when what you really need are new motor mounts and refreshing hoses (smoothness and good response). Its not just about HP, there is a reason people enjoy the old 4 cylinder cars, and if you look you can tap into that same feeling with a stock old 928.
Old 04-15-2010, 07:23 PM
  #20  
Ducman82
Thread Starter
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,983
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

for me its not about SUPER POWER. its about getting a little more pep out of the old girl. i dont plan on selling this car for more power. i like this car to much. Making the old motor breath and exhale better is key for me. but if i have to take the heads off for, lets say, fixing my mess (see first post), then is the great "while im there... " question.
Old 04-16-2010, 03:54 AM
  #21  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,583
Received 2,200 Likes on 1,241 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robot808
Hackers car I think of as an exception, not the rule.
There are other 16V's making this kind of power and some even more. I'm not sure if anyone has pushed a 4.5 100% US car this far, probably a good reason for that!!

Originally Posted by robot808
I have been dying to get up and meet those guys.
Get on up here!!!

Originally Posted by robot808
I would love if Tim would build me the next 16V SC, but I doubt he would
Don't be so sure about that
Old 04-16-2010, 05:23 AM
  #22  
hopwood
Racer
 
hopwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 339
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The easiest route to 300hp is to drop in a Euro S / S2 motor since they put out 300 and 310 bhp respectively. S is CIS, S2 is L Jet.

Of course those motors already come with the cams, heads etc to make that power and the higher CR. I don't see the point of pulling apart a 4.5 to spice it up when you could just source a Euro S that comes with that power from the factory and use that as a starting point. The S2 motor has a very aggressive cam profile (peak torque @4100rpm).

The next step would be exhaust system. I put an S2 motor into a 1979 car, we used an S intake and kept the CIS. Runs great, makes 295ft/lb but power topped out at 260bhp. I have now had the injectors refreshed and a couple of serious problems with the build addressed and expect about 280bhp, the rest I think will be hiding in the top end thanks to the old 79 single-pipe exhaust.

But I'm going back to the dyno next week so I'll know more then.

Joel
Old 04-16-2010, 09:12 AM
  #23  
LT Texan
Rennlist Member
 
LT Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,234
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The Euro S heads with bigger valves are just fine on top of a 95mm bore. No clearance issues or issues caused by clearance.

The smaller combustion chamber on the euro s head's bumped my compression ratio from 8.5:1 way up to 10:1 with no detonation problems whatsoever. This is a big win overall.

I have the Euro S cams installed too. (I've heard the 78-9 cams are already good.)

Stock intake, stock exhaust manifolds, borla cat-back.

Haven't dyno-d, but enjoying it nevertheless.
Old 04-16-2010, 10:29 AM
  #24  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Perez
The Euro S heads with bigger valves are just fine on top of a 95mm bore. No clearance issues or issues caused by clearance.

The smaller combustion chamber on the euro s head's bumped my compression ratio from 8.5:1 way up to 10:1 with no detonation problems whatsoever. This is a big win overall.

I have the Euro S cams installed too. (I've heard the 78-9 cams are already good.)

Stock intake, stock exhaust manifolds, borla cat-back.

Haven't dyno-d, but enjoying it nevertheless.
Dan, get that thing to a dyno man. You really need to think about changing those exhaust manifolds to the 85-86 style of to the MSDS headers. The stock exhaust manifolds on the 16v's are restrictive as it is. With your mods, you are probably leaving a good bit on the table by keepiong the stock exhaust manifolds. And it's an easy swap too.
Old 04-16-2010, 10:50 AM
  #25  
Ducman82
Thread Starter
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,983
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

now i just need to source an S2 motor..
Old 04-16-2010, 11:18 AM
  #26  
Iwanna928
Rennlist Member
 
Iwanna928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Woodstock Ga.
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have read so many post in regards to 16v's and if you want power you can get it. Look at hacker, look at the fla turbo guy's.

A recent thread showed a dyno of a S4. 255rwhp or in that ball park, maybe lower.

Your 4.5 w/ headers should be where I am. 200rwhp mark. Euro heads and cams should get you to 250rwhp. Thats the same as an S4! You will be lighter, the sound of the 16V is superior in my ears. It would also be a lot cheaper and more fun than selling your car and buying a S4. Thats how I see it.

There was a member Jack Rifle or something like that, all he did was a cam and head change......no intake tb runners etc just heads and cams Dyno'd over 250rwhp and that was w/ a auto! So why would you sell an OB for not a lot these day's to buy a unknown(mechanical problems)S4 for 10k plus and then you will want to mod that! x-pipe, shark tune, all that cost money too!

If you like/love your car, just keep moding it over time and one day she will be exactly what YOU WANT!

For me I looked at the fact that the 928 platform's is safe in under 500rwhp. Safe is relative when you are dealing w/ 500rwhp. If it is for the street, 500rwhp will be almost impossible to use and keep it to the ground. Again if it is a street car 350rwhp to 400rwhp is a better bet and still slip and slid material. So what are your HP goals?

What do you think a forged bottom end 4.5L will do with 17lbs of boost? All I can say is hold on!

A 32v will make more power than a 16v, not hard to figure that out. Can you 16v make power and put a smile on your face, sure it can.





Stephen
Old 04-16-2010, 11:28 AM
  #27  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iwanna928
Look at hacker, look at the fla turbo guy's.

A recent thread showed a dyno of a S4. 255rwhp or in that ball park, maybe lower.

Stephen
Thats not normal. Something isn't working correctly on that car in my humble opinion.

I'm not trying to argue, I just don't want you to base your lione of thought on a sickly S4.

Carry on
Old 04-16-2010, 11:42 AM
  #28  
LT Texan
Rennlist Member
 
LT Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,234
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
Dan, get that thing to a dyno man. You really need to think about changing those exhaust manifolds to the 85-86 style of to the MSDS headers. The stock exhaust manifolds on the 16v's are restrictive as it is. With your mods, you are probably leaving a good bit on the table by keepiong the stock exhaust manifolds. And it's an easy swap too.
couldnt get those to fit right, even when the engine was on the engine stand. So I blew it off and just filed and matched the cast iron manifold's ports up.
Old 04-16-2010, 11:53 AM
  #29  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Perez
The Euro S heads with bigger valves are just fine on top of a 95mm bore. No clearance issues or issues caused by clearance.

The smaller combustion chamber on the euro s head's bumped my compression ratio from 8.5:1 way up to 10:1 with no detonation problems whatsoever. This is a big win overall.

I have the Euro S cams installed too. (I've heard the 78-9 cams are already good.)

Stock intake, stock exhaust manifolds, borla cat-back.

Haven't dyno-d, but enjoying it nevertheless.
I know this has been asked before here (lots of diff answers), but will the L-Jet manage Euro heads and cams without tuning?
Old 04-16-2010, 12:37 PM
  #30  
Tom928
Rennlist Member
 
Tom928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Perez
The Euro S heads with bigger valves are just fine on top of a 95mm bore. No clearance issues or issues caused by clearance.

The smaller combustion chamber on the euro s head's bumped my compression ratio from 8.5:1 way up to 10:1 with no detonation problems whatsoever. This is a big win overall.

I have the Euro S cams installed too. (I've heard the 78-9 cams are already good.)

Stock intake, stock exhaust manifolds, borla cat-back.

Haven't dyno-d, but enjoying it nevertheless.
Does this turn the engine into an interference motor?

cheers,


Quick Reply: 16v Upgrades?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:28 AM.