Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New Product: Aluminum Competition Torque Tube

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2010, 12:13 PM
  #31  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

No. The CF diriveshafts get their torsional strength from diameter, often 4, 5, and even 6" across.
There is no room for that in here.

I also beleive the torsional loading was engineered to soften damage to the drivetrain, like the use of springs in the center-hub of the clutch. You would not want the driveshaft to be rigid, IMHO. The shock loads on the transmission would be too high.
Carl Fausett is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 12:32 PM
  #32  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,676
Received 584 Likes on 305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
I was surprised to see the width of the fillets on those welds, but the welder did a great job.
...
very nicely done!
just when you think what else can be done................
Tony is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 01:33 PM
  #33  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Very pretty....wonder how it would polish up
James Bailey is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 02:03 PM
  #34  
DR
Rennlist Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
DR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,306
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James Bailey
Very pretty....wonder how it would polish up
Hmmm, so you like to polish "tubes", eh??

HI JIM!! Hope you are doing great!

Dave
DR is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 02:07 PM
  #35  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 340 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

So there is a 25lbs difference between the empty aluminium and empty steel TTs?
Imo000 is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 02:08 PM
  #36  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James Bailey
Very pretty....wonder how it would polish up
Now I'll need a nice lightweight polished billet sleeve for the steel autobox torque tube.

The next gen of these will be an extrusiion with both inner and outer fins on it. The bearing holders will index in the iner fins, while the external finns will help disspate heat. Anodized in your choice of colors with polished faces on those outside fins. I could put strips of LED's in the upper fins to show off the polished heat shields under the car too. Wahoo!


Like most things 928-specific, there just isn't a huge market.
dr bob is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 02:21 PM
  #37  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,174
Received 412 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Frye
The stock design is essentially like straddling a battering ram. If the front or rear is hit squarely (or hits something), the impact gets transferred past the passengers to the opposite end of the car by the passenger cage and the TT.
The walls of the stock steel tube are surprisingly thin. The tube will absorb some of the energy of a severe impact by crushing/bending.

I have a TT from an '83 auto that was driven under the back of a semi trailer. The trailer's bumper crushed the front of the engine, pushed it down, and sheared off the intake manifold. (Didn't reach the cab.) The TT is compressed and bent a few degrees, about 1 foot back from the engine. (The engine and trans mounts sheared off as they were designed to do.)

Given the wall thickness, I reckon there is some flex in the stock tube as well.
PorKen is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 03:03 PM
  #38  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Good information, Porken.

Good thread to all!
Carl Fausett is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 08:14 PM
  #39  
Brad W
Burning Brakes
 
Brad W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So since the Corvette has a TT with the trans in back, what is it made from? I would think aluminum and we know the Vette has a lot of flex.
Brad W is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 08:59 PM
  #40  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

It's OK for the car to flex, so long as the forces causing the flex aren't applied to the tube. Regular motor and rear trans mounts isolate the frame enough to "protect" the tube from excessive torsional stress as thge frame moves around.

I'm thinking harder and harder about the extruded aluminum tube. Ribs would limit flex, help with torsional rigidity. So what would break off while the tube is still intact? Bellhousing ears?
dr bob is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:29 PM
  #41  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
So there is a 25lbs difference between the empty aluminium and empty steel TTs?
I believe that steel assembly being weighed still has the big cast iron vibration dampner inside while the "race" tube has none. After all if you solid mount the engine and transmission and are O K with THAT level of vibration it probably makes no difference !
James Bailey is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:43 PM
  #42  
Jerry Feather
Rennlist Member
 
Jerry Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 2706 Skyline Drive, Grand Junction CO 81506
Posts: 6,658
Received 611 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by byrdman454
Carl,
Very cool product.

I was just curious about the material properties. Are these tubes heat treated after welding? Your website mentions that these tubes are made from 6061 series aluminum. I am assuming 6061-T6? It has good properties with a yield strength of @ 35ksi. The problem comes in when welding this material. The properties near the welds lose about 80% of its strength and reverts to a 6061-O condition. This has a yield strength of about 8ksi. I was just wondering how you were getting around this since the concern is with the strength of the tube.
This is a false concern since although the T6 alloy will go dead soft when it is welded, it will age harden itself back to about 98 percent of its original hardness in about 24 hours and then over time all the way back.
Jerry Feather is offline  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:58 PM
  #43  
Black Sea RD
Former Vendor
 
Black Sea RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brad W
So since the Corvette has a TT with the trans in back, what is it made from? I would think aluminum and we know the Vette has a lot of flex.
The C5 and later Corvette TT is very different from the 928 TT. It's much bigger, beefier and uses a drive shaft "tube." It has rubber connectors at each end of the drive shaft to reduce drive line shock loads.

Carl has given racers another way to reduce sprung weight from the 928. Looks very beefy in it's own right and should handle itself just fine in a track 928 with a proper roll cage as he suggests.

The only exception we have is with the chosen bearing units. We think our aluminum units would be a much better fit in this beautiful aluminum TT.

As far as weight, we have a customer 5 speed TT rebuilt with three aluminum Super Bearings and no vibration dampener and it weighs about 43 pounds.

The 5 speed TT gutted weighs in at approximately 27.6 pounds

The 5 speed drive shaft weighs about 12 pounds

Cheers,

Last edited by Black Sea RD; 04-13-2010 at 10:17 PM.
Black Sea RD is offline  
Old 04-14-2010, 02:26 AM
  #44  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
It's OK for the car to flex, so long as the forces causing the flex aren't applied to the tube. Regular motor and rear trans mounts isolate the frame enough to "protect" the tube from excessive torsional stress as thge frame moves around.
I agree - Steel or alu TT if you solid mount the motor and trans the TT will start to contribute some stiffness to the unibody, quite how much will depend on how much the body twists and how stiffly the motor and trans mounts are connected to the body.

I'm thinking harder and harder about the extruded aluminum tube. Ribs would limit flex, help with torsional rigidity. So what would break off while the tube is still intact? Bellhousing ears?
I'm guessing a little OK a lot by judging thickness from pics. But I would think that the tube is more than adequately strong and stiff for normal or track use. I'ld reserve judgement on the welds between tube and endplate without more info.

Re what would break off while the tube is intact - my thoughts are the bolts would pull the threads out of the trans/bellhousing.

My concern (and Carl's quite sensibly) if one were to use the tube in a non caged car for road use would be exactly how the original tube is supposed to react in the event of crash, (I'm not clear on that) and does the Alu tube perform similarly. It's no beyond the bounds of possibilty that it could perfom better.
jon928se is offline  
Old 04-14-2010, 10:24 AM
  #45  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 340 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James Bailey
I believe that steel assembly being weighed still has the big cast iron vibration dampner inside while the "race" tube has none. After all if you solid mount the engine and transmission and are O K with THAT level of vibration it probably makes no difference !

That's what I was trying to find out. If the dapener was left out from the aluminium TT, then it's not really a 25lb savings, is it?



Carl, What is the weight difference between the two empty tubes? Any other deleted/changed parts have no relevance on what the TT is made from. Or am I missing something?
Imo000 is offline  


Quick Reply: New Product: Aluminum Competition Torque Tube



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:44 AM.