Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

A 1,000 mile trip and a Garmin GPS users Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2009, 02:32 PM
  #16  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69gaugeman
All this means is that the ETA is very well programmed. I have two Garmins. They are the best for street second best for the water (Ratheon is best on the water but $$$$). Street one is a garmin 255w.

Download the DR. Frankenstein voice. Absolutely hilarious. It randomly just says **** while you are driving.
I think they did do a good job over all, but average estimated speeds that work in Wyoming would not work in Southern Cali or DC or Atlanta for that matter.

For the Southeast the estimated speeds are to high unless you are a Kamakazi driver.
I know there are not any of these types here.
Old 10-20-2009, 02:47 PM
  #17  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
I think they did do a good job over all, but average estimated speeds that work in Wyoming would not work in Southern Cali or DC or Atlanta for that matter.

For the Southeast the estimated speeds are to high unless you are a Kamakazi driver.
I know there are not any of these types here.
I believe that embedded data includes speeds of the roads traveled. Otherwise you would never be even close. It would be easy for the unit to calculate your speed vs speed limit and 'figure out' how you are driving or your driving style.
Old 10-20-2009, 06:50 PM
  #18  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The current (ish) Garmins (I use a Nuvi 760i probably an Aus only edition) assumes you will travel precise;y at the speed limit for the routed roads to calculate the ETA. My only complaint with the unit - It puts up a target that can take you into go to jail and throw away the key territory .

Given that marine GPS ten years ago could predict your eta based on yuor current SOG you'ld think that they'ld have figured out an algorithm that would extrapolate how much in excess of the current speed limit you were travelling and recalculate based upon that ????
Old 10-20-2009, 07:33 PM
  #19  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jon928se
The current (ish) Garmins (I use a Nuvi 760i probably an Aus only edition) assumes you will travel precise;y at the speed limit for the routed roads to calculate the ETA. My only complaint with the unit - It puts up a target that can take you into go to jail and throw away the key territory .
Exactly!

To have a moving average of 68.9 on a 500 mile trip that includes a couple of cites and then JUST barely beat the first ETA, you are going to spend a lot of time at a speed way past the speed limit.

I have the 760 American unit.
Old 10-20-2009, 08:57 PM
  #20  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,593
Received 2,206 Likes on 1,245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
you are going to spend a lot of time at a speed way past the speed limit.
Isn't that the idea?
Old 10-20-2009, 09:15 PM
  #21  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Isn't that the idea?
Seven hours of it was fun and scary (fear of arrest) at the same time.
Old 10-20-2009, 11:10 PM
  #22  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jon928se
The current (ish) Garmins (I use a Nuvi 760i probably an Aus only edition) assumes you will travel precise;y at the speed limit for the routed roads to calculate the ETA. My only complaint with the unit - It puts up a target that can take you into go to jail and throw away the key territory .

Given that marine GPS ten years ago could predict your eta based on yuor current SOG you'ld think that they'ld have figured out an algorithm that would extrapolate how much in excess of the current speed limit you were travelling and recalculate based upon that ????
Mine does. It recalculates as I am driving (Nuvi255w)
Old 10-20-2009, 11:38 PM
  #23  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69gaugeman
Mine does. It recalculates as I am driving (Nuvi255w)
Of course they recalculate, what we are talking about is the first ETA, not 1/2 mile from the destination.
Old 10-21-2009, 01:18 AM
  #24  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 87
Of course they recalculate, what we are talking about is the first ETA, not 1/2 mile from the destination.
Mine always calculates down. Meaning if I drove the speed limit I would get there exactly on time.

Once I start driving after about five minutes I always end up at the destination exactly as calculated. Meaning it must have taken into account my propensity to exceed the limit.
Old 10-21-2009, 04:42 AM
  #25  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 69gaugeman
Mine always calculates down. Meaning if I drove the speed limit I would get there exactly on time.

Once I start driving after about five minutes I always end up at the destination exactly as calculated. Meaning it must have taken into account my propensity to exceed the limit.
No. When it recalculates it only accounts for where you are now and how long it will take from there to the destination at the speed limit.
Old 10-28-2009, 07:43 AM
  #26  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jon928se
No. When it recalculates it only accounts for where you are now and how long it will take from there to the destination at the speed limit.
Hmm. I would disagree. Unless you know something about the programming that I don't

I drive weekly from Guelph to Windsor. Once I get on the 401 (major highway with 100km speed limit) it will change the eta as I am driving. After about 5 minutes the ETA that it shows is within a couple of minutes of the time I actually get there. I set the cruise control to 117km/h.

From that it MUST take into account the speed I am doing and not the speed limit as other wise the 3 hour trip would be off in the neighborhood of 25 - 30 minutes. It never is.
Old 10-28-2009, 08:38 AM
  #27  
Adrian_
Instructor
 
Adrian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've used the european versions of both the the Garmin 255 and 750, and there's no chance you can make the initial time of arrival, unless your trip is mostly on highway.
Within big cities the time of arrival is so way off that it's basically a useless feature.


.....................................

1979 Euro

Last edited by Adrian_; 10-28-2009 at 05:40 PM.
Old 10-28-2009, 10:20 AM
  #28  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adrian_
I've used the european versions of both the the Garmin 255 and 750, and there's no chance you can make the initial time of arrival, unless your trip is mostly on highway.
Within big cities the time of arrival is so way off that it's basically a useless feature.
I have done exactly that, like my post said, right at 500 miles and went through Memphis TN and Birmingham AL.
I may have exceeded the posted limit once.
Old 10-28-2009, 10:22 AM
  #29  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,593
Received 2,206 Likes on 1,245 Posts
Default

Road trip to Milwaukee last Thursday I shaved 11 minutes off the initial time estimate in the rain
Old 10-28-2009, 10:29 AM
  #30  
Adrian_
Instructor
 
Adrian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blown, I think you should specify how many of those 500 miles were on hightway/interstate. I clearly said that if you go mostly highway aso you can make it.

I found it unreliable when travelling extensive distances on smaller roads. (not to mention big towns)



..........................................

1979 Euro

Last edited by Adrian_; 10-28-2009 at 05:40 PM.


Quick Reply: A 1,000 mile trip and a Garmin GPS users Question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:47 PM.