Lower ball joint question
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Lower ball joint question
Does anyone know what the difference between the 78-86 and the 86.5 - 95 steel ball joints are? Is there a difference in length?
Part numbers are 928.341.049.12 and 928.341.049.08 respectively.
I am having a camber issue on my right front and I am wondering it is caused by the PO putting in the later model ball joint.
Thanks!
Part numbers are 928.341.049.12 and 928.341.049.08 respectively.
I am having a camber issue on my right front and I am wondering it is caused by the PO putting in the later model ball joint.
Thanks!
#2
Race Car
Does anyone know what the difference between the 78-86 and the 86.5 - 95 steel ball joints are? Is there a difference in length?
Part numbers are 928.341.049.12 and 928.341.049.08 respectively.
I am having a camber issue on my right front and I am wondering it is caused by the PO putting in the later model ball joint.
Thanks!
Part numbers are 928.341.049.12 and 928.341.049.08 respectively.
I am having a camber issue on my right front and I am wondering it is caused by the PO putting in the later model ball joint.
Thanks!
Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
#3
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Ted,
You have the early style ball joints on your car - looked at your pic you sent me.
Roger
You have the early style ball joints on your car - looked at your pic you sent me.
Roger
__________________
Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014
928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."
Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014
928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."
#4
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
How about the lower control arms, I know the later ones are 12 mm shorter then the earlier ones and have the word Porsche cast into them, any other differences?
#5
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
I have the entire 86.5 front suspension sitting under my porch. If you want, come over and have a look at it and compare it to what you have.
#6
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Nothing meaningful meaning they are direct bolton but 12mm is enough difference already to make mixing parts useless in all but track cars.
#7
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I measured it last night, it is the proper one for the 85. Still a mystery why I can't get proper camber, I may have to take it to a frame place and get it checked out. Nothing looks out of the ordinary.
Trending Topics
#8
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Ted, you can do a lot of figgerin on frame dimensions with a plumb bob and a tape measure, and some masking tape markers on the floor underneath. Start with the side-to-side comparison of mounting points for the control arms. Then compare the relative locations of ball joints to see if the arms are bent or the lower joint is distorted. The comparison of the pivot point locations will tell you if the frame is tweaked. FWIW, this is what the frame shop will do, except it's easier for them with the car sitting on the sspension but up higher off the floor on the ramps.