Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New 928 purchase MY pros and cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2009 | 08:46 AM
  #1  
jwillman's Avatar
jwillman
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 12
From: Austin, Texas
Default New 928 purchase MY pros and cons

So I have been reading forums and looking at classifieds for a few weeks. I have read a lot of posts that talk to MY personal preferences.

I would be interested in the seasoned 928 owners opinions on the general driveability, reliability, known problem areas and DIY maintenance considerations for the following:

1979 928, 4.5 16v, automatic (assume 3 spd), 87K miles
1983 928S, 4.7 16v, 5 spd manual, 117K miles
1986.5 928S3, 5.0L 32v, atomatic (assume 4 spd), 150k miles

Thanks
Jim

Last edited by jwillman; 08-06-2009 at 09:40 AM. Reason: ADDED MILES FOR 1986.5
Old 08-06-2009 | 09:04 AM
  #2  
cold_beer839's Avatar
cold_beer839
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
From: Lillington, NC
Default

"1986.5 928S3, 5.0L 32v, atomatic (assume 4 spd), miles not yet provided"

32v means more power, but it's an interference engine, which means if the TB breaks the engine gets damaged (16v cars don't have this issue). If it's a late 86.5 then it has the S4 Brembo brakes, ABS, and S4 suspension. The late 86.5 is very popular. Check the VIN, if the last 4 digits are higher than 1000 then it is a late 86.5.
Old 08-06-2009 | 09:07 AM
  #3  
eatiles's Avatar
eatiles
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Default

Check the 83 and the 86.5, drive them and decide> Good luck
Old 08-06-2009 | 11:43 AM
  #4  
depami's Avatar
depami
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 289
From: Cleveland, MN
Default

I have both an 82 five speed and an 86.5 auto. Both are fun but very different. The 82 feels lighter but also feels more nimble. The 86.5 feels heavier but is much more powerful and faster. At first I was skeptical about an auto but think I like it better.

The 82 will run on regular but the 86.5 wants premium.

If I were asked to compare the two, I'd say it's like a Sportster vs. a Road King.

Most important is probably the mechanical condition and what will need to be done.

Gook luck and have fun.

depami
Old 08-06-2009 | 11:52 AM
  #5  
soontobered84's Avatar
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,999
Likes: 286
From: Texas
Default

IMHO 83 is the easiest to work on.

Buy the best car you can afford. PPI?
Old 08-06-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #6  
GlenL's Avatar
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 40
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Default

The '83 will be the best to drive.

The '86.5 will be the best to ride

The '79 will be the cheapest.

Anyone really needs prices, pictures and records to make a recommendation. And to be you to know your personal preferences, budget and goals.
Old 08-06-2009 | 01:03 PM
  #7  
dprantl's Avatar
dprantl
Race Car
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 4
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

If I were you I would hold out until I found an '85-'86.5 5-speed.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 08-06-2009 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
F451's Avatar
F451
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 11
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Default

I would decide whether I wanted a 5 sp, or an auto first. I'm a manual tranny guy, but was pleasantly surprised with how much I liked my '85 auto.

I love the S4 5 sp though.

Then I'd look for the best one in my budget, get the ppi, etc.

Good luck and keep us posted. -Ed
Old 08-06-2009 | 01:22 PM
  #9  
Imo000's Avatar
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,846
Likes: 340
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

If you are after a 5-speed, then regardless how good of a 928 you run into, hold out till you find one with a manual transmission or else you'll regret it really soon.

The 16Vs are also prone to valve damage when the T-belt breaks. Ask me how I know! If the pistons have any carbon build up, the piston will touch the valves. I know this from first hand experience. Also, the Euro 16Vs might be interferance too but I don't know this for sure.

My '85 32V 5speed can run circles around my old '83, 4speed auto. Manual is the way to go if you know how to drive one.
Old 08-07-2009 | 02:46 PM
  #10  
soltino's Avatar
soltino
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
The '83 will be the best to drive.

The '86.5 will be the best to ride

The '79 will be the cheapest.

Anyone really needs prices, pictures and records to make a recommendation. And to be you to know your personal preferences, budget and goals.


Drive,Drive, Drive EM.

tino
Old 08-07-2009 | 02:58 PM
  #11  
BBX's Avatar
BBX
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Did the rear suspension change on an s4?
Old 08-07-2009 | 06:38 PM
  #12  
F451's Avatar
F451
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,267
Likes: 11
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Default

Lots of good model year info here:

http://www.928s4vr.com/
Old 08-07-2009 | 07:38 PM
  #13  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,155
Likes: 371
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

Of the choices, assuming equal condition, 83 5 speed (I drive an 84 5 speed and both 85 and 86 automatics almost daily)

Building on your post, I'd also suggest post-84 5 speed, though.

Superior transmissions.
Old 08-07-2009 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
Vilhuer's Avatar
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,384
Likes: 63
From: Helsinki, Finland
Default

Originally Posted by BB79
Did the rear suspension change on an s4?
From S to late S with S4 brakes only small changes. Within S4 MY's few times but only to accomodate changes like RDK sensors. Basically entire '78-95 production used same rear suspension setup. All changes done to individual parts of it were done for different reasons than wanting to change actual Weissach suspension setup.



Quick Reply: New 928 purchase MY pros and cons



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:27 PM.