X-Pipe Dyno Results For A GTS
#31
Earnest,
I'm not sure of the total cause for different tires giving different results, but I'd say your assessment is likely true. The Hoosiers aren't made to compromise for ride quality or tread noise so have different sidewall stiffness and no doubt tread compound. The tires don't heat to more than "warm to the touch" on the dyno even after 3 repeated runs. They are absorbing power though. It's a condition of dumping power into them for a few seconds and then nothing for a while. The tire difference was noticable on my car in 5th and above 150 mph. Likely not a big difference if speeds were kept below 140 mph.
Ken was here doing some dyno checks and he brought a set of wheels/tires that was different weight. The different weight of wheels/tires didn't make a power difference.
I'm not sure of the total cause for different tires giving different results, but I'd say your assessment is likely true. The Hoosiers aren't made to compromise for ride quality or tread noise so have different sidewall stiffness and no doubt tread compound. The tires don't heat to more than "warm to the touch" on the dyno even after 3 repeated runs. They are absorbing power though. It's a condition of dumping power into them for a few seconds and then nothing for a while. The tire difference was noticable on my car in 5th and above 150 mph. Likely not a big difference if speeds were kept below 140 mph.
Ken was here doing some dyno checks and he brought a set of wheels/tires that was different weight. The different weight of wheels/tires didn't make a power difference.
#32
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 1
From: New York
I'd thought a lighter wheel/tire combo would help the car spin up the Dyno roller a little easier and net a slightly higher reading.
Another myth shot down.
#33
Not sure what other GTS's run but dynos can vary and others had mentioned how it is strapped down could make a difference. That is why I like dynapacs myself.
My Stock GTS a few weeks back did 295.39 rwhp and 320.31 torque with a high smoothing of 5 so we may have missed the peaks. This was at 95 degrees in a poorly ventilated room and my car is due for its 60k tune up. I would expect to see a bit more power with fresh plugs, cables, rotor distributor cap etc etc.
Just reread what you said. How could you hit 180 mph if your doing a 4th gear pull? The test needs to be closest to 1:1 and that would be 4th not 5th gear correct?
My Stock GTS a few weeks back did 295.39 rwhp and 320.31 torque with a high smoothing of 5 so we may have missed the peaks. This was at 95 degrees in a poorly ventilated room and my car is due for its 60k tune up. I would expect to see a bit more power with fresh plugs, cables, rotor distributor cap etc etc.
Just reread what you said. How could you hit 180 mph if your doing a 4th gear pull? The test needs to be closest to 1:1 and that would be 4th not 5th gear correct?
#34
#35
Not so sure I agree. Based on factory numbers should be 293.25 average +/- a little for stock for a 5 speed and 276 for an auto. these cars run 18 and 20% drivetrain loss for manual and auto. I got that info from a 20 year factory trained mechanic who specialized in 928's and 944's
#37
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 65
From: Back in Michigan - Full time!
#38
I think you might find the biggest improvement with the X pipe is throttle response.
#39
Anthony, the results recorded were a 4th gear run at baseline, though the one with the X was a 5th gear run.. I did say we ran a few 5th gear runs that were just about the same but better numbers...not by much. Not sure why Louie plugged in the 4th gear run.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.
#40
cobalt, i managed 333.5 rwhp with headers, custom exhaust and elgin cams. the dyno machine ajusted and called it 410 at the crank, the car screams like a demon and goes properly quick. i think that as long as youve got the LH and EZK doing what they should a GTS engine, is a GTS engine, from porsche.
#41
cobalt, i managed 333.5 rwhp with headers, custom exhaust and elgin cams. the dyno machine ajusted and called it 410 at the crank, the car screams like a demon and goes properly quick. i think that as long as youve got the LH and EZK doing what they should a GTS engine, is a GTS engine, from porsche.
Not so sure what they were using but 410 at the crank from 333.5 at the wheels seams wrong. I would think the number should be closer to 392 BHP, Doesn't matter it is still more than enough power and IMO reducing weight is more critical to these cars than adding power.
#42
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 1
From: New York
#43
#44
Anthony, the results recorded were a 4th gear run at baseline, though the one with the X was a 5th gear run.. I did say we ran a few 5th gear runs that were just about the same but better numbers...not by much. Not sure why Louie plugged in the 4th gear run.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.
I am using the stock multi electode plug. No pinging IMO near perfect charts. I also said my car was past due for a tune up so after it is properly tuned it may show more HP. Porsche always had a min number they would set, some cars do run better than others especially from that era.
I am definitely interested in your results, I am one that can never have too much power so long as it doesn't destroy the driveability of the car. I appreciate your opinion on the mid range increase and feel.
928 transmissions whether 5 spd or auto have the top gear straight through 1:1 ratio).
#45
Keith,
I'm sure both of the runs on the chart you have were 5th gear runs. I'll check the records to be sure. I probably shouldn't have brought up the 4th gear example, or should have explained it better. I wanted to illustrate that there are many variables, and which gear you use makes a difference. There can be no set value to try to equate rear wheel hp to crankshaft hp. The driveline/tire loss % changes with speed, and it is different depending on the transmission gear used. Dynos like the Dynapak can come closer because they bolt directly to the rear wheel hub and don't use the tire. That's one variable those dynos get around. However, they are limited in rotational speed and you can't use 5th gear. You'll have more loss due to using 4th so will typically show less rwhp. Back to comparing apples and Amsoil.
I'm sure both of the runs on the chart you have were 5th gear runs. I'll check the records to be sure. I probably shouldn't have brought up the 4th gear example, or should have explained it better. I wanted to illustrate that there are many variables, and which gear you use makes a difference. There can be no set value to try to equate rear wheel hp to crankshaft hp. The driveline/tire loss % changes with speed, and it is different depending on the transmission gear used. Dynos like the Dynapak can come closer because they bolt directly to the rear wheel hub and don't use the tire. That's one variable those dynos get around. However, they are limited in rotational speed and you can't use 5th gear. You'll have more loss due to using 4th so will typically show less rwhp. Back to comparing apples and Amsoil.
Anthony, the results recorded were a 4th gear run at baseline, though the one with the X was a 5th gear run.. I did say we ran a few 5th gear runs that were just about the same but better numbers...not by much. Not sure why Louie plugged in the 4th gear run.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.
The test was done on Louie's dyno both times...within 2 weeks of each other.
Since there is no wind resistance or similar weight issues when running in real time, a 5th gear run will reach 180+ at 6800 rpms or there abouts. I try pull off the throttle at 6500, but as it sweeps, I am sure I have seen the needle at 6800.
Not attempting to pull the wool over anyones eyes here. Louie pretty much confirmed his dyno is comparable to others out there. The numbers speak for themselves whether you would like to believe it or not.
I feel the difference with the X in the lower mid range, though the graph shows the increase in power from 3K on up.
I have no answers as to why some GTS's perform better than others. I would expect it is a combination of things. One thing that I have been screaming about for a long time is the single prong cold copper plugs, but most think the multi prong plugs are the way to go. I have always disagreed and never had pinging either....which is a whole 'nother issue for many out there. Maybe the rich mixture is helping...or not. It's just a good running motor I guess.