Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Race Fuel for DE - overheating potential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2008, 08:13 PM
  #31  
VehiGAZ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
VehiGAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,556
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
we don't have a lot of ethanol blend down here
We are cursed with it up here.

After talking to Roger, I feel much better about the situation. A few gallons shouldn't be enough to trash the cat or the O2 sensor, but there is the slight chance that it will plate out on the catalyst, making it less effective. I guess we won't really know what happened until I have it tested again next year. If I fail emissions, I'll replace the whole mess with an x-pipe and new high-flow cats.

As for the fans, I'll look into the situation. It won't be my first issue like this - I've had more relay problems with this car than I have with all the other cars I've ever owned combined!
Old 07-22-2008, 08:16 PM
  #32  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There is no need to worry about ethanol blends, the fuel will still be as good as it's rating.
Old 07-22-2008, 09:53 PM
  #33  
VehiGAZ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
VehiGAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,556
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sweanders
There is no need to worry about ethanol blends, the fuel will still be as good as it's rating.
In terms of octane, that's true, but in terms of energy content, it's not. Ethanol has a lower energy content by volume than gasoline, so when they add the 10% ethanol, it is like diluting the gas. Horsepower and mileage both decrease. In my VehiCROSS, I consistently get a full 20% better mileage on non-ethanol conventional gas than I do on the ethanol-oxygenated crap they pump in my state. Unfortunately, I have to go further and further afield to find the good stuff.
Old 07-22-2008, 10:15 PM
  #34  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pcar928fan
]A stock car like the one in question (it was not specified that it had been modified in ANY way, thus my comments phrased the way they were) would NOT benefit in any way from a race (or high octane) fuel
PCA Memorial Day DE I got into an argument with the owner of an 89ish 911 speedster when he saw me put 87 into my stock (except for headers) 79 track car.
He insisted that on the track you MUST run the highest octane available. I tried to explain that on the high end my car is 8.5:1 compression (I’m sure closer to 8:1) with stock, very conservative timing. He said that doesn’t matter, on the track you must run 93…..

Previous owner ran 110 leaded…..waste of money. Since there are no O2 sensors or cats he didn’t damage anything other than his pocket book.

If I crank up the timing a bunch, that would probably make higher octane necessary. That is assuming the car responds in a positive way to more timing. Next dyno day should clear that up.
Old 07-22-2008, 10:29 PM
  #35  
James-man
Race Car
 
James-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,860
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Low compression and modest timing, sure it can handle lower octane. Without knock sensors, and assuming high demands of the engine at the track (higher temps, higher revs, more brutal driver), it might be good to be conservative with higher octane.

I wouldn't argue about it though. I wouldn't track my 32v on 87, but that is a different engine. Someone spooked me recently with the mention of the possibility (theoretically) of silent pinging. With modified exhaust, it is hard to hear anything in front of the driver.
Old 07-22-2008, 10:35 PM
  #36  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James-man
Low compression and modest timing, sure it can handle lower octane. Without knock sensors, and assuming high demands of the engine at the track (higher temps, higher revs, more brutal driver), it might be good to be conservative with higher octane.

I wouldn't argue about it though. I wouldn't track my 32v on 87, but that is a different engine.
Higher revs? Everything above 5,000 is just noise with the 79

This was my first weekend with the car and I knew it was 100% stock. Next time the cam timing will be increased along with higher ignition timing (and colder plugs).

My temp gauge doesn't move from the lower mark on the track.
Old 07-22-2008, 10:37 PM
  #37  
James-man
Race Car
 
James-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,860
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Everything above 5,000 is just noise with the 79
The noise of an OB with significant exhaust mods is pretty wicked. I am a fan.
Old 07-22-2008, 10:47 PM
  #38  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James-man
The noise of an OB with significant exhaust mods is pretty wicked. I am a fan.
Ok, this thread is officially hijacked

http://www.erik27.com/79928/trackvid.wmv
Old 07-22-2008, 11:12 PM
  #39  
James-man
Race Car
 
James-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,860
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kewl.

Back on topic - would anyone track a car with e-fuels? Why?
Old 07-23-2008, 07:53 AM
  #40  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VehiGAZ
Yes, that is fair to say. I'm a noob to the track - what can I say? I know better already...

Does anyone have any hard advice about burning off the rest of the gas vs. draining it?
A suggestion I would make (but have never followed myself) is to send a sample of the oil off for testing.
Old 07-23-2008, 08:03 AM
  #41  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James-man
Kewl.

Back on topic - would anyone track a car with e-fuels? Why?
Indy cars...
Old 07-23-2008, 08:05 AM
  #42  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,918
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Does anyone have any hard advice about burning off the rest of the gas vs. draining it?
Drain it and use it in non-cat engine. Burn it in your lawnmower of something like that. Find a kid with a dirt bike and give him a free afternoon of riding. Also can use it in a boat.

The 110 at LRP (and almost everywhere) is leaded. Typically you find one or two leaded gases at the track (110 and 112) and one unleaded 100.
Old 07-23-2008, 09:15 AM
  #43  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VehiGAZ
In terms of octane, that's true, but in terms of energy content, it's not. Ethanol has a lower energy content by volume than gasoline, so when they add the 10% ethanol, it is like diluting the gas. Horsepower and mileage both decrease. In my VehiCROSS, I consistently get a full 20% better mileage on non-ethanol conventional gas than I do on the ethanol-oxygenated crap they pump in my state. Unfortunately, I have to go further and further afield to find the good stuff.
I know about the formulas being different, I guess it is being blended differently in the US than in Europe. I have been alternating between three gas brands here in Sweden for about 150.000 miles and see no real life difference in consumption.
Old 07-23-2008, 10:16 AM
  #44  
928autobahndreamer
Rennlist Member
 
928autobahndreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James-man
Kewl.

Back on topic - would anyone track a car with e-fuels? Why?
American Lemans Series runs E 85. At least in some of the cars. ie Vets
Old 07-23-2008, 10:41 AM
  #45  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

I would tune my car for E-Fuels if it was a consistent blend and readily available near the track.

I'm not sure about other states but up here E-85 can range from 85% ethanol to as low as 50%.


Quick Reply: Race Fuel for DE - overheating potential?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:05 PM.