Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Interesting article for the engineers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2007, 07:03 AM
  #16  
Stephencs601
Rennlist Member
 
Stephencs601's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Long Island
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I turbocharged the first RX7 back in 1980 and it screamed. I knew they had problems with the Apex seals, but have since fixed that. Old RX3 were nasty oil burners. I like the concept of the motor, whereby, fewer moving parts. Yes the Cat does take care of the byproducts from the cycling of the motor. I have seen some of the cats get red hot from use. Bit of a fire hazard to say the least. All in all, the motor does have the potential to someday do as was intended.
Old 12-07-2007, 07:19 AM
  #17  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,377
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Saab engine had block split in two. Pistons moved in upper part and crank in lower. Block halfs were joint together on one side with large hinge and had adjustment which moved up and down on other side. Result was that compresion chamber size got smaller or bigger while stroke lenght remained same. Problem was heavy gage hinge and adjustment mechanism needed to make them stand compression cycle loads.






Quick Reply: Interesting article for the engineers



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:52 PM.