Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rear hatch; why use a motor to open it ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007, 11:25 AM
  #1  
Erling G-P
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Erling G-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Rear hatch; why use a motor to open it ?

Just curious; does anyone have the background for Porsche's decision to do this ?

My own motor runs, but only opens the hatch in about 20% of my attempts; for the remaining ones, I have to resort to using the key.

Recall reading elsewhere here, that the rear hatch opening motor system is one of the most complex items in the 928s.

Thus puzzled about the reason for selecting such a way to do it - why not just a simple cable pull (which worked just fine in my first-car Toyota)

Cheers,
Erling
Old 10-17-2007, 12:08 PM
  #2  
mj1pate
Three Wheelin'
 
mj1pate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,791
Received 120 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Erling G-P
Just curious; does anyone have the background for Porsche's decision to do this ?

My own motor runs, but only opens the hatch in about 20% of my attempts; for the remaining ones, I have to resort to using the key.

Recall reading elsewhere here, that the rear hatch opening motor system is one of the most complex items in the 928s.

Thus puzzled about the reason for selecting such a way to do it - why not just a simple cable pull (which worked just fine in my first-car Toyota)

Cheers,
Erling
Porsche embarked on a benevolence to take care of the growing contingent of Bavarian clock makers. The door lock and rear hatch mechanisms were naturals to put them to work. The result is the entertaining cacophony of whirring, buzzing noises that you hear when you activate these electromechanical marvels. If you lean closely and listen very carefully, you can hear a little fragment of the Pinocchio "Gepeto" tune, played by tiny music box harp...

Mike
Old 10-17-2007, 12:31 PM
  #3  
Erling G-P
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Erling G-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL Mike, thanks for that explanation - things are now much clearer for me..

Cheers,
Erling
Old 10-17-2007, 01:08 PM
  #4  
JEC_31
Three Wheelin'
 
JEC_31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Erling, excellent point.

This may very well be a case of over-design ("Let's make the world's most advanced hatch opening mechanism!") followed by under-funding ("To make up for the huge cost overruns from the design department we'll use cheap materials").

I do not relish the idea of converting a 928 to cable-pull - that's a lot of planning and tearing into the car, then a lot of bracket fabrication, maybe some welding and riveting.
Old 10-17-2007, 01:17 PM
  #5  
Alan
Electron Wrangler
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 13,431
Received 424 Likes on 291 Posts
Default

Really I don't know - a simple cam actuator with a solenoid drive should have been enough - no parking mechanism required...

I suppose we can be grateful it isn't vacuum actuated though...!

Sometimes it appears the engineers weren't well enough supervised and started "overdoing it"...?

Alan
Old 10-17-2007, 01:29 PM
  #6  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan
I suppose we can be grateful it isn't vacuum actuated though...!
Alan
My 1967 Buick Riviera has a vacuum actuated trunk release. It has worked perfectly, never any problems. My grandfather (he purchased the car when new) was always expecting it to quit working, but it outlasted him. Open the glovebox, push the little red button, hear the pssssstaaah of the vac system, trunk opens every time.

Rich
Old 10-17-2007, 01:43 PM
  #7  
Erling G-P
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Erling G-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the input guys

"Ein kabel-pull ?? Idiot!! Dummkopf!! Dis is supposed to be unseren state-of-the-art auto!! Wir kann nicht use such ein simple system! Machen something mehr kompliziert bitte !!"

Cheers,
Erling
Old 10-17-2007, 02:38 PM
  #8  
Nine2Eight
Instructor
 
Nine2Eight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it all stems from authorized German Beer breaks at the Porsche Werks.
Old 10-17-2007, 03:34 PM
  #9  
BrianG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When my trunk opening clock-works retired, I replaced the unit with a simple solenoid operating the stock latch-release flag mechanism, thinking that this would finally resolve my intermittent functionality of the remote trunk release. No dice! Half of the intermittancy problem is actually the issue of the alignment of the two mating parts of the locking mechanism. If they are mis-aligned, the stock flag mechanism cannot move the nylon latch far enough to disengage it from its mating latch-piece.

After messing around with the latch alignment (unsuccessfully), I decided to modify the latch-release flag part by making the flag tab project further. Thank heaven for TIG!! A 50% increase did the job. Releases are now 100% reliable, and I suspect that this modification would have a similar effect on release reliability, even if still clock-works driven.
Old 10-17-2007, 03:51 PM
  #10  
LT Texan
Rennlist Member
 
LT Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,236
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan
...I suppose we can be grateful it isn't vacuum actuated though...!
Alan
Thanks Alan. My vacuum actuated locks recently stopped working perfectly. Now the system loses vacuum after about 5 minutes. Can't wait to hunt that one down.
Old 10-18-2007, 01:36 AM
  #11  
daveo90s4
Pro
 
daveo90s4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 693
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

On my 1990 S4 the pull **** will only activate the motor to release the hatch if one of the doors is open. As a consequence, pulling the **** accidentally (??) while driving will not release the hatch (assuming you're not driving with the doors open, of course!).

So could there be some safety reason for the complicated set up? A simple cable could release the hatch while in motion?

Nah, can't be - more likely simply over-engineering!!

Erling, by placing a 1 Euro coin under each edge of the body-mounted latch plate (near each of the hex head bolts) cured my intermittent hatch release problem. This fix has worked for others too.

Regards
Old 10-18-2007, 02:02 AM
  #12  
jpitman2
Rennlist Member
 
jpitman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,283
Received 49 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Apart from the hatch and receiver getting misaligned, the bush from the link to the operating arm can break up and produce enough slop to prevent correct operation. I fixed one by making a brass bush (7mm od, 5mm id), and retained it with a 2-56 screw into the arm. Shouldnt be too hard to find a piece of tubing to do the job....
jp 83 Euro S AT 51k
Old 10-18-2007, 02:03 AM
  #13  
Alan
Electron Wrangler
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 13,431
Received 424 Likes on 291 Posts
Default

DaveO - yes they deliberately went to great lengths for that safety feature....

It does make you wonder how much downforce the wing makes - that they are still worried it will fly open...

Who wants to test this...?

Alan
Old 10-18-2007, 11:31 AM
  #14  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Alan,
I once drove about 200 miles (upstate NY to NYC) without having the hatch latched. I'd closed but forgotten to latch it with a nice forceful push.
Mostly highway driving. 60-80mph stuff. Only when I got back to bumpy NYC did I hear a strange rattle from the hatch bouncing up on the bad pavement.
And that's with non-collapsed hatch shocks.

You guys shouldn't complain. Hans und Franz could have duplicated the hatch lockdown unit for the front hood. But we all know that 928's are so reliable that owners rarely open the hood.
Old 10-18-2007, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Erling G-P
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Erling G-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by daveo90s4
Erling, by placing a 1 Euro coin under each edge of the body-mounted latch plate (near each of the hex head bolts) cured my intermittent hatch release problem. This fix has worked for others too.
Thanks Dave, must see if I can use this trick too. Wonder if it'll work with other currencies, or if it's only Euros that will do...

Cheers,
Erling

Last edited by Erling G-P; 10-18-2007 at 04:43 PM.


Quick Reply: Rear hatch; why use a motor to open it ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:15 PM.