Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Lateral G load in an S4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2007, 10:13 AM
  #16  
cdbtx
Pro
 
cdbtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mill Creek, Wa
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good data Swaybar - I run the AIM data acquistion system but am very impressed with your display. Sweet system and great displays. It's easy to read the data and make assumptions - but unless you have the driver input - it's basically nothing but numbers.

Are you racing your car?


Chuck


83 Kiln Red 928S
Old 07-25-2007, 12:22 PM
  #17  
cooleyjb
Documenter of Ineptitude
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
cooleyjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SwayBar
I don't believe so since there is nothing to calibrate. Nothing more than proper orientation of the unit is necessary for the accelerometers.
I'd bet good money that's what it is. Just a slight tilt can explain the differences. If you think about it if the unit is turned 90 degrees on it's side it should read 1.0g.

Originally Posted by SwayBar
Perhaps that is because the left hand turns are much tighter thus slower (..5, 6, and 8), except for Turn 13?

Now that I've re-read this, I'm sure driver-error has something to do with it too!
If you look at your corner speeds for the corners like 8 and 12 you actually have fairly similar speeds but the lateral load is a fairly different. They are fairly similar speed corners at least in a formula car.

Originally Posted by SwayBar

The best portion for sustained on the posted chart would be foot-marker 12,500 to 15,000 which represents the Carousel, where the GT sustained between 1.20 and 1.44 G's through it. For comparison, my Z06 sustained slightly higher, and did a max of 1.51 G's; both at the apex which is approximately the middle of the rumble strip.
Was your Corvette setup similarly or was the car a softer sprung car, ie. stock? That will have a lot to do with it.
Originally Posted by SwayBar

With the software, I can blow-up any portion of the track; so instead of looking at 21,000 feet of track in a chart with virtually zero resolution, I can look at 100 feet of track with lots of resolution and curve definition. Maybe I'll do that with the Carousel tonight and post the screenshots.
That is very cool, I look forward to see how the carousel changes as you get to the last third of the corner.
Originally Posted by SwayBar



You may be correct, but from everything I've read, there is no need to factor anything for flat or banked curves due to the unit using the GPS in conjuction with the accelerometers.
It's something that Gtech never mentions but the banking of a turn is very important. If you think about it a tire only has a certain amount of grip it can sustain laterally. In roundy round they use the same tires at every event but the banking has a large amount of factor in the speed.
Originally Posted by SwayBar



No doubt; I'm very happy with it, and recommend it to anyone who's looking for a track data-logger.

Those were astute observations/comments; do you drive or hang-out at the track?
My current racecar is in my avatar 89 van diemen. But I do hang out at Road America quite frequently too.

I've always had some problems with the numbers that the Gmeters put out. I find them to be good at comparing your laps to previous laps you have run but there are way too many variables to make the absolute numbers mean much. Like I've said, the lean of a car, the tilt of a course, etc. can have noticeable affects on the numbers.
Old 07-25-2007, 01:56 PM
  #18  
jorj7
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jorj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,197
Received 54 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Richard S
Tim, what's wrong with averaging 135mph through the canyon?....It just means you get to go faster on the rest of the course!!!!

Rich
Rich,

Here's my plan for the return leg:

162 mph avg for the first 28.5 miles
139 mph avg in the Gap (10 miles)
179 mph avg to the finish (8 miles)

This should give us our 160 mph avg. Just don't tell anyone about the plan....
Old 07-25-2007, 09:53 PM
  #19  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,781
Received 150 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Hi Tim:

You can easily measure the forces yourself with the new Butt-Dyno. No more wondering, if or how much you "can"... Best of all: It's just $399.95:

http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...products_id=41

If it turns out you are low on power, you can make some simple adjustments with this:

http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...products_id=30

But if you are lacking in g-forces, they also have a simple lowering kit that will lower your center of gravity. Just don't try this on your boat...

http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...products_id=11

Old 07-25-2007, 11:05 PM
  #20  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jorj7
Rich,

Here's my plan for the return leg:

162 mph avg for the first 28.5 miles
139 mph avg in the Gap (10 miles)
179 mph avg to the finish (8 miles)

This should give us our 160 mph avg. Just don't tell anyone about the plan....
179 mph avg to the finish (8 miles) ...Works for me, I won't tell anyone

Rich
Old 07-25-2007, 11:56 PM
  #21  
928drvr86.5
Rennlist Member
 
928drvr86.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dubuque, Iowa.
Posts: 1,663
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cooleyjb
Also you need to be able to factor out the lean of the car and tilt of the corners to get true readings. For example the end of the carousel falls away and 13 is on camber for a good chunk of it. For every degree the car leans and track is from level it is a difference of .011 on the readout.
Correct! when held statically at 180 degress from it's 0G calibrated plane an accel will read 2G, at 90 degrees yields 1G , and 0 degrees is obviously 0g ETC.. So for every degree of body roll the accel will error an amount of .011 as mentioned. However, If a vertical accelerometer were used in this package( which i doubt), it would be capable of correcting for body roll. Still a fairly accurate measurement though. GPS would not be accurate in this respect unless 11 or so satellites were linked for triangulation. As i read from the website, the GPS is used for positioning and speed only.
Old 07-26-2007, 12:37 AM
  #22  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

As an aside, GPS can be used to tell you some very interesting stuff. Vboxes with the dual anttenae option can calculate Ax, Ay, and body slip angle very accurately. I don't think the system in question is that sophisticated though. Still looks to be very useful.
Old 07-26-2007, 09:18 AM
  #23  
928drvr86.5
Rennlist Member
 
928drvr86.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dubuque, Iowa.
Posts: 1,663
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

GPS is being used by Excavating companies nowadays to very accurately calculate the cubic yards of material to be moved at a jobsite before bidding on the contract. You will see alot of construction equipement with Trimble or Topcon GPS systems on them for this purpose and also for very fine grading applications.
Old 07-26-2007, 09:45 AM
  #24  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

No need to use butt dyno anymore. These will not record G's AFAIK but are othervise fun toys.

http://www.racechrono.com/?lang=en
http://www.tempes.com/index.html
Old 07-26-2007, 05:01 PM
  #25  
Tahoe Shark
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tahoe Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lake Tahoe, Ca
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jorj7
Rich,

Here's my plan for the return leg:

162 mph avg for the first 28.5 miles
139 mph avg in the Gap (10 miles)
179 mph avg to the finish (8 miles)

This should give us our 160 mph avg. Just don't tell anyone about the plan....
179 on a 180 tech, yah right. You obviously have not seen the radar gun near the finish have you. You probably have a super secret method of averaging 179 without going over 180, huh? If Rich can do that he's riding with me.

Nicole,
Are you now handling the Kaleco Auto products? Might be a good addition to your already excellent product line. If they make a lateral accelerometer to interface with the butt dyno I would be very interested getting one for Rich. He would have to download the data of course cause I'm not touching it after he goes through the canyon with George.
Old 07-26-2007, 08:20 PM
  #26  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,781
Received 150 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tahoe Shark
Nicole,
Are you now handling the Kaleco Auto products? Might be a good addition to your already excellent product line. If they make a lateral accelerometer to interface with the butt dyno I would be very interested getting one for Rich. He would have to download the data of course cause I'm not touching it after he goes through the canyon with George.
I'm currently evaluationg the market opportunities...
Old 08-01-2007, 06:47 AM
  #27  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Just discovered this linked from another car forum I read..

The Nintendo Wii - their latest game console, has a controller with a 3-axis g-meter in it, accurate to 2 decimal places. Someone's written a script to get this data into their PC and plotting it in Excel.

If anyone has access to a Nintendo Wii and a PC, looks like its not too hard to measure your lateral G's:

http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3362586

Check out the spreadsheet linked from the post.. the lateral G's are in column D on the output sheet.

Edit/disclaimer: There is some doubt about the overall accuracy or margin for error on wii console so this is mainly for interest value

Last edited by Hilton; 08-01-2007 at 07:18 AM.



Quick Reply: Lateral G load in an S4



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:59 AM.