Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Why did Porsche opt for a timing belt vs. chain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2006, 03:19 PM
  #46  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

People focus so much on the TB, which is 8 to 10 hours of work every 60,000 miles, thats what about 5% of the overall PM for the same period? Doesn't the 944 have an even shorter interval for replacing the timing belt?

Anything that could be done to improve the system would be nice, but not essential.
Old 12-30-2006, 03:30 PM
  #47  
ceedee
Three Wheelin'
 
ceedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: celtown, florida
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
Plus it is just freaking insane that the absolute lowest points on the car are the alternator and AC compressor brackets.
that's will always be a mystery to me
Old 12-30-2006, 04:18 PM
  #48  
UKKid35
Drifting
 
UKKid35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,703
Received 59 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sterling
do you really want to have your AC Compressorlock up, & break your timing belt?
Ask the Citroen SM owners about that one...
Old 12-30-2006, 08:37 PM
  #49  
Ron_H
928 Barrister
Rennlist Member

 
Ron_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Maybe one reason for choosing a belt over a chain is the experience Porsche had with that "other model" they have been making since 1964 or so: the 911.
Lots of problems with chain tensioners and I carried spare tensioners and parts to change them in my 914/6. Big problem when they fail. Some guys use mechanical tensioners and scrap the oil filled stock ones but then they must be set with shims and probably result in more wear 'cause they don't absorb any energy or shock. Then the factory went to pressure fed tensioners and everyone thought their problems were over. Wrong!! Pressure fed tensioners can also fail, particularly when you lose oil pressure for whatever reason, but that is a moot point in a 911 engine; I have broken a crank in a matter of seconds when I lost pressure due to an oil leak. And let me tell you about changing chain tensioners in a 911 engine, particularly one that's turned around and stuck up against a firewall like on my 914/6. Carry lots of band aids. And a few C clamps to clamp the chains while you pull the tensioners and,......and...... lots of swearing and grunting and groaning. Particularly when you do it on the side of the road and the sun is going down...... and it is getting cold.....and you're about 400 miles from home. At least in the 928 your tensioner light will come on (hopefully) and you'll have time to do something about it at the next town. With the 911 chain tensioners, you are either on spec or not. No adjustment except with the solid tensioners. But what did Porsche learn by making that glorified VW, right?
Old 12-31-2006, 02:25 AM
  #50  
Chazz
Racer
 
Chazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom in Austin
I think it's true that belts were the "in" thing when Porsche was developing their water-cooled engines in the 1970s. The fiber-reinforced belt material was a relatively new solution that manufacturers were attracted to. What does Cayenne use today, is it a belt or a chain? That would give an idea of which solution has proven superior (by whatever criteria) since then..
The Cayenne uses a duplex chain cam drive.
Old 12-31-2006, 02:53 AM
  #51  
ceedee
Three Wheelin'
 
ceedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: celtown, florida
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UKKid35
Ask the Citroen SM owners about that one...
is that what happens to them?
Old 12-31-2006, 04:03 AM
  #52  
UKKid35
Drifting
 
UKKid35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,703
Received 59 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ceedee
is that what happens to them?
Originally Posted by http://www.semantics.uk.com/buyers/index.htm
The air conditioning system can also give problems. When originally fitted there was no switch to turn it off. Most cars now have this fitted as this is linked to the timing chain. If the air conditioning goes down the tensioners can expire - nasty mess.
I have also read that if the air con was switched on the cam sprocket, which is a press fit, would then slip due to the sudden increase in load and cause the interference engine to crash. Not surprisingly knowledgeble owners now have a pin fitted to the sprocket.
Old 12-31-2006, 06:03 AM
  #53  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,831
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
ferrari dosent use chains

there is nothing wrong with a belt. They need to be serviced. Big deal, pay attention to them and your fine. The belt is well made and very strong.
I agree about the maint statement. My Espada has chains, and they are a constant concern to me. Nothing is 100% safe except non-interference. there is no reason any engine has to be built as interference for the public, non-racing crowd. Cutting the recesses in the piston for valves would have saved many millions of $$$ in repair bills over the last 30 years for the fleet of cars that are belt driven. sometimes I think there is an evil conspiracy with mechanics to keep interference engines beign produced.

Ferrari used chains for many years. Some great engines do have chains.
Old 12-31-2006, 12:08 PM
  #54  
fabric
Three Wheelin'
 
fabric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Evanston, IL, USA
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by danglerb
I was arguing with my Chevy mechanic pushrods vs timing chains or belts. One of his points is that pushrods allow a much smaller and lighter design, the LSx motors are about 200 lbs less than a 928 motor, and a fair amount smaller.

Makes me wonder how much of current DOHC design is engineering and how much is marketing?

DOHC engines have better high RPM performance, pushrods do better at the low end. I'm guessing this is a function of 4 valves vs 2, and that you can have higher redlines with the DOHC. Looking at the Z06 engine, redline is 7K rpm, and even at 7 liters they're getting 16/26 for mpg. Some of that is the ridiculous 1-4 forced shift if you don't really gas it, so if you drive to avoid that I bet fuel economy is horrid.

THere's probably more to it than just the weight, I'm pretty sure the DOHC is just a more efficient engine, and if you look at it in a 4 cylinder application it's a different ball of wax.
Old 12-31-2006, 11:37 PM
  #55  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If I understand it correctly a big advantage of 2 vs 1 exhaust valve is heat dissipation from the hot gases. Large valves absorb more heat, but are limited to the same size stem for cooling.

I don't see it talked about that much, but I get the feeling that high lift cams put a HUGE stress on valve springs and they wear out much faster, from heat I think.

On topic to the thread, I have no general opinion on belt vs chain, but the "way" Porsche did our belt is a bit annoying.
Old 01-01-2007, 02:43 PM
  #56  
JKelly
Burning Brakes
 
JKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by N421LV
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I often get asked this question by non-Porsche types (vette owners, in particular ) when they learn about the admittedly short replacement interval of our timing belts. So...all you engine design experts out there....any ideas as to why Porsche went with a timing belt instead of a timing chain on the 928 & 944? What are the tradeoffs?
My two other cars, and the previous one before them (all non-porsche), have all used a belt and the interval of service was the same as the 928 at 60,000 miles. After doing a very thorough 928 timing belt service myself, I realize that the best way to think about it is as a whole "system" and not just a "belt", which of course is how Porsche thought of it. If a person understands and maintains the different components of the "system", I don't see how it can fail. How often does a 928 belt just snap? very very rarely....that's not including the ones that shred. I would bet that most of the shredded ones could have been prevented. An occasional peek down through both the left and right timing belt cover vents can tell you a lot about the health of the "system". The only thing I wish Porsche would have done differently is to somehow make visual inspection of the components behind the center timing belt cover easier; maybe by using a two or three piece center cover.
Old 01-01-2007, 07:07 PM
  #57  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JKelly
The only thing I wish Porsche would have done differently is to somehow make visual inspection of the components behind the center timing belt cover easier; maybe by using a two or three piece center cover.
Clear TB cover? With LEDs
Old 01-01-2007, 09:09 PM
  #58  
Normy
Banned
 
Normy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FLORIDA
Posts: 5,248
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, my understanding is that the Gilmer belt has less friction, is far quieter, and makes it possible to drive other items other than the camshafts.

-Frankly, I'd prefer a chain over a belt. My understanding is that while chains do break/skip, it takes hundreds of thousands of miles or heavy high-RPM use to cause this to happen at the same intervals that normal belt changes on M28's take place. In short, the chain isn't infallible...but it is far more reliable.

VW and Porsche in the early 1970's went on a Gilmer-belt spree. All their engines had these, but when the problems started to crop up down the road, they changed their tactics: modern Porsche engines use chains, as do all the VW starting with the VR6. VW specifically installed three timing chains on this V6 because chains are more compact than belts.

N!
Old 01-01-2007, 11:32 PM
  #59  
Mike Frye
Craic Head
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike Frye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jersey Shore, USA
Posts: 8,795
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jkelly
The only thing I wish Porsche would have done differently is to somehow make visual inspection of the components behind the center timing belt cover easier; maybe by using a two or three piece center cover.
There is one other indicator you can look at relatively easily. One 'lister recently used it as his early warning and he says it saved his engine.

If you regularly check your airbox you will have a way to tell if your belt is shredding. The fine black residue will collect on the air filter and you can easily get to that without any tools.

Obviously this is the type of thing that only works in one direction (meaning the reverse isn't true that if there's no residue there's no problem ) But it is one additional indicator for the arsenal.
Old 01-02-2007, 08:01 AM
  #60  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,578
Received 2,191 Likes on 1,237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fabric
Looking at the Z06 engine, redline is 7K rpm, and even at 7 liters they're getting 16/26 for mpg. Some of that is the ridiculous 1-4 forced shift if you don't really gas it, so if you drive to avoid that I bet fuel economy is horrid.
Friend of mine started taking his ZO6 track car to work (410+rwhp) to save money over driving his Yukon every day.


Quick Reply: Why did Porsche opt for a timing belt vs. chain?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:34 PM.