Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Need Bosch Number for Warm up regulator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2011, 01:21 PM
  #16  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luis_M
Below are the "official" parts lists by model and region from the Bosch database. The excerpt you included is taken from ROW 4.5L list. Numbers were different for USA cars, and there does appears to be some duplication between porsche and bosch part numbers (ie. some porsche parts changed bosch #'s over time, and some bosch #'s were used for more than one porsche part #). The part is the "warmlaufregler". I put some other translations on the 4.7L list (the car I have).

ROW 4.5L used .036, replaced by .087 in 7/80 (both porsche p/n .04)

USA 4.5L Kjet used .023 (9/77-2/78), .053 (9/77-8/78), and .063 (9/78-7/79). Looks like .023 was only on very early 5 speeds, but the others had overlapping production. My best guess is that the porsche .02 part is the .023 initially, replaced by the .053 and later then .063, but the automatics (porsche part .03) probably used the .053 the whole time? USA CIS owners can help confirm this.

ROW 4.5L Kjet used .036, replaced by .086 in 7/80 (both porsche p/n .05)

You can get these yourself at http://www.automotive-tradition.com/.../recherche.htm

Hope this helps. I would guess your #1 and #6 cars probably came had .036 WURs our of the factory.

Luis

1981 928 Euro S 5sp
Fantastic info, Luis!

I have visual confirmation the #1 car and RoW #0579 have the 036. Both 5 speeds.

I think Kevbolacy will chime in with the p/n off his '79 US 5sp.

Starting to make a little more sense. Now I just have to figure out the differences. I believe that info is out there, just have to find it.

Very helpful, Luis, et al. TY
Old 12-03-2011, 01:54 PM
  #17  
Luis_M
Instructor
 
Luis_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One difference between the. 036 and. 086 seems to be a more elaborate double heating element on the later bimetallic strips which would change the way the mix leans out on a cold start. My 036 moved roughly linearly from cold to warm pressure over about 6-7 minutes when I measured control pressure with fuel pump relay jumpered and engine off. Not sure if the later setup is faster, slower, or nonlinear. The WSM shows the same pressures and temp curves for all S cis cars, so I suspect that may be the only difference between those two parts. Different springs and/or different strips would change the slope of the cold pressure vs ambient temp curve. The springs should also affect warm temp.
Old 12-03-2011, 01:58 PM
  #18  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

^^^^ I'm with ya. Do all the 928 WUR's have only one vaccuum port? The other port being vented to atmosphere on all of them.
Old 12-03-2011, 04:40 PM
  #19  
Luis_M
Instructor
 
Luis_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as far as I know, yes, only one vacuum port for all CIS 928's, the top port always to "atmospheric" attaching to the throttle body well below the throttle plate.

Revision 12/7/11: See post#23, it looks like there was one version with only a top port

Last edited by Luis_M; 12-08-2011 at 01:19 AM. Reason: to add revision
Old 12-03-2011, 07:50 PM
  #20  
BigAl1
Pro
 
BigAl1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have an '036 from my 1980 Euro S vin 92A0820533.
Old 12-07-2011, 09:08 PM
  #21  
Jadz928
Rennlist Member
 
Jadz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Frankenmuth, Michigan
Posts: 8,680
Received 120 Likes on 73 Posts
Default Just a little more insight....

WUR p/n's from an early 1977 Porsche publication:

928 606 109 01 - RoW
928 606 109 02 - USA/Canada/Japan
928 606 109 00 - USA, option M925 (Version for high altitude areas)
Old 12-08-2011, 01:18 AM
  #22  
Luis_M
Instructor
 
Luis_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

interesting, since -00 and -01 are not in the PET catalog.
I did find an old german Bosch company reference document today listing the details of all of the 0.438.140.xxx family of WUR's. The .023 WUR was a different case with only a top connection (Type 4 - mit hoehenkorrektur translates to "with altitude correction") so that was probably the 928-606-109-00 "for high altitude areas". Not sure which would have been the -01. All the others bosch #'s (.036, .053, .063, .086, .087) had the same case (Type 3) with the top and side connections. The .053 is listed as the replacement for the .023. As an aside, it would appear that having the extra port to atmospheric allows automatic altitude correction in the later WUR versions, since the membrane would experience the difference between manifold and atmospheric pressures, as opposed to the earlier WUR design with a single sealed box connected to manifold only. I guess we need more details on the internals of the .023 to know how "altitude correction" was achieved in that design.
Old 12-17-2016, 01:44 PM
  #23  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,098
Received 74 Likes on 61 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Luis_M
Below are the "official" parts lists by model and region from the Bosch database. The excerpt you included is taken from ROW 4.5L list. Numbers were different for USA cars, and there does appears to be some duplication between porsche and bosch part numbers (ie. some porsche parts changed bosch #'s over time, and some bosch #'s were used for more than one porsche part #). The part is the "warmlaufregler". I put some other translations on the 4.7L list (the car I have). The dates quoted seem to be production dates for Bosch. My 1981 4.7, early production, has a .036 WUR, for example, not the .086.

ROW 4.5L used .036, replaced by .087 in 7/80 (both porsche p/n .04)

ROW 4.7L Kjet used .036, replaced by .086 in 7/80 (both porsche p/n .05)

USA 4.5L Kjet used .023 (9/77-2/78), .053 (9/77-7/79), and .063 (9/78-7/79). Looks like .023 was only on very early 5 speeds, but the others had overlapping production. My best guess is that the USA manuals (porsche .02 part) used the .023 initially, replaced by the .053 and probably later by the .063, but the automatics (porsche part .03) used the .053 for sure in the later cars but possibly for the entire auto-trans production. USA CIS owners can help confirm this.

You can get these yourself at http://www.automotive-tradition.com/.../recherche.htm

Hope this helps. I would bet your #1 and #6 cars probably had .036 WURs out of the factory.

Luis

1981 928 Euro S 5sp
Luis,
I swapped my 4.5L 240HP Euro engine (M28.01) with a 4.7L 300HP S-engine (M28.12) but kept the WUR ( 0 438 140 036 )

Could the difference in WUR explain why I have too rich fuel leading to black sparkplugs and engine not kept running due to drowning of the engine ?

Oh btw, my 4.7L engine is from 1981 , engine nr 8215357

kr
Gerrit

Last edited by GerritD; 12-17-2016 at 02:17 PM.
Old 12-17-2016, 05:07 PM
  #24  
jpitman2
Rennlist Member
 
jpitman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,281
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Check the WSM for the pressure curves of the two different WUR, but my brain says that a WUR for the 4.5 with smaller inlet pipes, and less power would need less fuel than the 4.7 S.
I suggest you do the fundamental checks on fuel pressure at the WUR to see if its behaving before worrying about model differences too much. If its running rich when fully hot that would imply that EITHER the mixture adjuster on the air flow body has been adjusted rich, OR the WUR is giving LOW back pressure, which would be pretty unusual IMHO - mostly they fail high due to crud in the unit.

jp 83 Euro S AT 57k
Old 12-17-2016, 09:53 PM
  #25  
jtrygstad
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jtrygstad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 227
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Here's a comparison between WUR rates. Fairly significant between the two engines. My 80 EuroS had a WUR from the PO's Mercedes SEL. Took couple of years to figure out the problem, so it can be a big deal.

Eventually, I drew up the charts below sending the one on the right to a Delorean shop in Texas to re-calibrate my "Mercedes" unit. Everything worked great after the rebuild and calibration.


Old 12-17-2016, 10:51 PM
  #26  
Daniel5691
Drifting
 
Daniel5691's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,126
Received 235 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

John,
Thanks for this data set.
This is useful and interesting.
Old 12-19-2016, 01:42 AM
  #27  
jpitman2
Rennlist Member
 
jpitman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,281
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

From those charts (out of WSM?) I would expect a 4.7S fitted with an 063 WUR to run a little lean, but not much. When I last had gauges on my -086 WUR I saw a fully hot through pressure of 45psi (3.06bar), and it ran (and runs) very well, and cold starts fine down to 45F . OP says he has an -036 WUR, but that version is not listed in the WSM - what are the pressures for that model?
My WSM only lists -053, 063, 087 and 086 WUR.
What pressures is the OP seeing?

jp 83 Euro S AT 57k
Old 12-19-2016, 10:54 AM
  #28  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,635
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Changes in control pressure change the position of the arm for a given airflow. That pushes the piston up a different amount. The position of the piston is further affected by the adjusting screw.

What you need to do is tune the A/F with the adjuster screw for the new system.
Old 12-19-2016, 11:58 PM
  #29  
jtrygstad
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jtrygstad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 227
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

As I recall, the chart data came from the WSM. Regarding pressures, don't recall - lost the car 9 years ago (my wife traded in for a Volvo).
Old 08-05-2020, 02:28 PM
  #30  
dscho
1st Gear
 
dscho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Luis thanks for the information. Do you know what the other two terms correspond to? (The first four numbers - 0 438 and the second three numbers - 140)


Quick Reply: Need Bosch Number for Warm up regulator



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:57 AM.