Power to weight ratio's 84,86,89?
01-28-2006, 08:16 PM
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Power to weight ratio's 84,86,89?
What was the weightn on these cars? It seems the 85-86 with the higher output motor would be up there in the weight to h.p. ratio. How do these stack up?
01-28-2006, 08:19 PM
#2
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
If you include Euros... 84-86 S2s have the best power to weight, except for GTSs.
On 928 Specialists site:
https://www.928gt.com/t-928engine.aspx
On 928 Specialists site:
https://www.928gt.com/t-928engine.aspx
01-29-2006, 09:34 AM
#4
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Being fat and lazy 928 has surprisingly good power to weight ratio.
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...57#post2324057
0-100 kmh or 0-60 mph times have more to do with gearing than kg/hp and hp/1000kg
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...57#post2324057
0-100 kmh or 0-60 mph times have more to do with gearing than kg/hp and hp/1000kg
01-30-2006, 05:53 AM
#6
Drifting
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: zürich, switzerland
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HTML Code:
So the '80 S Euro is 188 bhp/ton and the '89 GT is 186 bhp/ton, accelleration times are 7.2 and 5.8, even I can work out that doesn't make sense
The gt is about 10% higher than the '80 S Euro
also gearing and stuff makes a difference, for example if you can do 60mph and still be in first gear...
Marton