Max. Practical HP through STOCK trans?
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see lots of posts about TT, SC, etc. on the Sharks.
At what stage do you have to worry if your: 5 spd, 3 spd Auto or 4 spd Auto can take it (i.e. "I better upgrade the clutch...etc.")?
Thanks!!
At what stage do you have to worry if your: 5 spd, 3 spd Auto or 4 spd Auto can take it (i.e. "I better upgrade the clutch...etc.")?
Thanks!!
#3
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sniper seems about on target for the auto transmission. It seems that the auto is regarded as slightly stronger vs the 5 speed in handling high torque.....but there are several track cars with very high power engines that get along well with the stock 5 speed. You can get the automatic rebuilt using hardened AMG internals....that should support a 1000hp engine....keep in mind mercedes still uses a 5 & 7 speed version of this transmission....the 4 speed we have in AMG cars typically had 400+hp & torque in a car that weighed at least 1000lbs more!
Brian
Brian
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I doubt the automatic will handle ay more than an S4 5 speed without some serious work. There were a group of porsche builders down here that built a 950 hp TT S4 and it broke every part in the drivetrain including couplers, input shafts and the maiin drive shaft. Maybe if you have some bigger input/driveshafts machined out of chome moly and other heavy duty parts installed like clutches etc.
It would be interesting to know, but personally i think it might work better to put 930 turbo gears in a 5 speed box (super expensive if even possible). At any rate those builders gave up.
Its a shame really, because a 924 turbo gearbox is just that. Packed with 930 parts and can handle around 800 hp.
I have built 3 turbo setups and never had problems, but I kept the power down. I think the general concensus is that 500-600 hp is the breaking point for 5 speeds. 928intl mentioned that they knew of a SC 928 racecar making 600 hp did blow transaxles. Also from what i have heard the later gearboxes are stonger than the early gearboxes. I also asked about auto's but they responded nobody really knows. I guess nobody has pushed autos to and past the breaking limit like they have 5 speeds.
It would be interesting to know, but personally i think it might work better to put 930 turbo gears in a 5 speed box (super expensive if even possible). At any rate those builders gave up.
Its a shame really, because a 924 turbo gearbox is just that. Packed with 930 parts and can handle around 800 hp.
I have built 3 turbo setups and never had problems, but I kept the power down. I think the general concensus is that 500-600 hp is the breaking point for 5 speeds. 928intl mentioned that they knew of a SC 928 racecar making 600 hp did blow transaxles. Also from what i have heard the later gearboxes are stonger than the early gearboxes. I also asked about auto's but they responded nobody really knows. I guess nobody has pushed autos to and past the breaking limit like they have 5 speeds.
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My trans guy says the MB A/T can be built to handle insane levels of power. He's done several of these boxes(all in MBs though), and he said that if you shave the clutch plates and pack in more clutches that they're almost indestructible.
It's a pretty reasonably priced modification too, if your'e already getting the trans done. Figure on an extra 300 bucks over the cost of a std rebuild, and maybe another 100 for a reworked performance valve body.
I suspect that ultimately the weak point in the 928 driveline are the CVs. Of course you can get custom shafts made for about any car out of chrome moly steel, but they AINT cheap, lol.
It's a pretty reasonably priced modification too, if your'e already getting the trans done. Figure on an extra 300 bucks over the cost of a std rebuild, and maybe another 100 for a reworked performance valve body.
I suspect that ultimately the weak point in the 928 driveline are the CVs. Of course you can get custom shafts made for about any car out of chrome moly steel, but they AINT cheap, lol.
#6
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Clearwater Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by tammons
There were a group of porsche builders down here that built a 950 hp TT S4 .
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TAREK
WOW !! how exactly did they get there? 23 lbs of boost and 8:1 CR on forged pistons and metal gaskets?
#9
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale FLORIDA
Posts: 5,248
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by marc@DEVEK
Has nothing to do with hp, it is allabout torque ...torque breaks trans..
About 450+ rwfttq will shred a manual trans....I am on trans#3
About 450+ rwfttq will shred a manual trans....I am on trans#3
Marc-
What about all the "boostards": it occurs to me that these people are driving around with upwards of 600 ft/lb's of torque. Either I don't know about them blowing transmissions, or somethings missing here. Care to explain how their cars stay alive?
N!
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
K-27s are too small for that kind of power level, or rather, they'd have to run at crazy boost levels to deliver that kind of flow. Even K-28s would be marginal i'd think.
Probably explains why they blew the motor up.
You'd want something like two Turbonetics TA-44s for a 1000hp 5.0L engine to keep the boost level down around 1 bar i'd think. With a really good front mount intercooler, superior plumbing and seriously flowing heads/intake you might hit 1000hp at 10psi with twin TA-44s.
Probably explains why they blew the motor up.
You'd want something like two Turbonetics TA-44s for a 1000hp 5.0L engine to keep the boost level down around 1 bar i'd think. With a really good front mount intercooler, superior plumbing and seriously flowing heads/intake you might hit 1000hp at 10psi with twin TA-44s.
#11
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes
on
34 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Normy
Marc-
What about all the "boostards": it occurs to me that these people are driving around with upwards of 600 ft/lb's of torque. Either I don't know about them blowing transmissions, or somethings missing here. Care to explain how their cars stay alive?
N!
What about all the "boostards": it occurs to me that these people are driving around with upwards of 600 ft/lb's of torque. Either I don't know about them blowing transmissions, or somethings missing here. Care to explain how their cars stay alive?
N!
![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
#12
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by m21sniper
K-27s are too small for that kind of power level, or rather, they'd have to run at crazy boost levels to deliver that kind of flow. Even K-28s would be marginal i'd think.
Probably explains why they blew the motor up.
You'd want something like two Turbonetics TA-44s for a 1000hp 5.0L engine to keep the boost level down around 1 bar i'd think. With a really good front mount intercooler, superior plumbing and seriously flowing heads/intake you might hit 1000hp at 10psi with twin TA-44s.
Probably explains why they blew the motor up.
You'd want something like two Turbonetics TA-44s for a 1000hp 5.0L engine to keep the boost level down around 1 bar i'd think. With a really good front mount intercooler, superior plumbing and seriously flowing heads/intake you might hit 1000hp at 10psi with twin TA-44s.
They did mention they were custom turbos, but he would not tell me what they were. At the time I just figured twin t4's but later I wondered, because there is just zero room for anything bigger than a t3 on the drivers side. looking back now I expect they were some sort of hybred K's.
Most of the guys I have run into down here that build that sort of high HP setup run on race gas and 20-24 psi.
He did mention at the end of it all, they sorted everything out, and had all the engine and drivetrain problems solved except for the transaxle. They could never get one to hold together so they gave up.
Also when I told him of my plans to TT a 928, he said you should be driving a 930.
#13
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been wondering how different 911 G50 gearbox is compared to 928 G28.10 and later boxes. It's said in factory documents they share some common parts. Syncro related I think. If syncros have similar design if not even same measurements maybe gears are interchangeable between these two box types. AFAIK G50 can take insane amount of hp when right parts are in. Maybe same parts can be used in G28? Design problem of pinion shaft being inside input shaft is harder to remove. No matter how good gears are they will break if shafts can move.
#14
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Vilhuer
I've been wondering how different 911 G50 gearbox is compared to 928 G28.10 and later boxes. It's said in factory documents they share some common parts. Syncro related I think. If syncros have similar design if not even same measurements maybe gears are interchangeable between these two box types. AFAIK G50 can take insane amount of hp when right parts are in. Maybe same parts can be used in G28? Design problem of pinion shaft being inside input shaft is harder to remove. No matter how good gears are they will break if shafts can move.
From the way this guy talked about breaking everything in the drivetrain, you would basically have to address every part from the clutch through the transmission. I am not sure if the stock ring and pinion could even handle that kind of power.
All of it would be super expensive and possibly cost more than a nice car. i did have an aquaintance down here running a 750 hp 911 with a ceramic clutch and he had 40K on it, and he drives like a demon, so something like that would work for the clutch.
Funny that a 924 turbo trans could handle gobs of power, but not a 928.
#15
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
1000 bhp at 1 ba boost requires a 500 hp NA engine from a 5.0 l ..... Lets think about that fofr a minute ...ok, who is going to pay for that effort.
...it is just a matter of time....and if there are those in denial, either Don H or I can demonstrate![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I was at Bob Norwoods awhile back when he was dyno'ing the 3l, 1100 rwhp engines for the dragster cars ... YES, I SAW the runs and the sheets .... NO BS here.
Hmm...does that mean a 2000 rwhp 6l?
Spooled it up with NOS, and lit it off.
Marc
...it is just a matter of time....and if there are those in denial, either Don H or I can demonstrate
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I was at Bob Norwoods awhile back when he was dyno'ing the 3l, 1100 rwhp engines for the dragster cars ... YES, I SAW the runs and the sheets .... NO BS here.
Hmm...does that mean a 2000 rwhp 6l?
Spooled it up with NOS, and lit it off.
Marc