Customer Story - 430 CHP CIS SC K-Jet
#31
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by bcdavis
Is that a function of the engine's capacity, intake, heads, exhaust, etc, or is that a function of the efficiency of the supercharger setup?
I guess we probably will never know, until you finish a kit for the OB's!![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I guess we probably will never know, until you finish a kit for the OB's!
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#32
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Louie928
In this case, the lower gain per # boost could be the restrictive exhaust.
It also looks like a K-jetronic 80-83 euro which does not have the power or breathing of the LH 84-86 euro. But cool anyway.
#33
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by James-man
If we were to look at assessing performance potential mathematically, you should account the relative time spent in each incremental RPM to reflect the work that can be done.
To really determine if a given pattern is better or worse then you need to evaluate it over time and look specificly at where the RPMs are after a shift.
#35
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Rob Roy
What, maybe high 12's on an OB if he can get the traction???
Pretty good
Pretty good
#36
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by heinrich
More restrictive intake, exhaust, valves, heads. Surely this makes sense.
Last edited by m21sniper; 11-22-2005 at 04:55 PM.
#37
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Glen,
I would bet area under an HP curve where HP is one one axis and time is on the other axis would work just fine. Time series is the ticket. The trick is you need to start and stop counting time ticks at the point in time where RPMs hit within the range you wish to study. Shouldn't be hard. If you can you plot time vs RPMs from standard dynojet data, you can easily find the start and stop time points for the RPM range. Using this data for projecting real world application would require assuming a linear relationship as load increases, among other things. Seems reasonable but do not know if it would really hold true.
No cheating though. You have to use an entire upshift RPM band, not just the 200 RPM sweet spot.
In spite of all of this, average is a more understandable number than area under the curve, unless area is expressed in total work done.
I would bet area under an HP curve where HP is one one axis and time is on the other axis would work just fine. Time series is the ticket. The trick is you need to start and stop counting time ticks at the point in time where RPMs hit within the range you wish to study. Shouldn't be hard. If you can you plot time vs RPMs from standard dynojet data, you can easily find the start and stop time points for the RPM range. Using this data for projecting real world application would require assuming a linear relationship as load increases, among other things. Seems reasonable but do not know if it would really hold true.
No cheating though. You have to use an entire upshift RPM band, not just the 200 RPM sweet spot.
In spite of all of this, average is a more understandable number than area under the curve, unless area is expressed in total work done.
#39
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi,
Sorry to alter the thread slightly but I think its relevant![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
On SUNDAY 4th DECEMBER here in UK I am going to a dyno day at Silverstone,its run by Porsche 1 so various Porsches will be there .
Most are short of 2 cylinders of course![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
But myself and 1 other 928 S4 will be there![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The dyno is 1000 hp by the way (so they say) so the supercharged monster should be fine on it![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I have 2 questions maybe someone can help with....
1,....My car was a theoretical 310 bhp to start with....now have added Promax Chips ,Rmb and Nology leads...
What do you think the RWHP will or SHOULD BE ?
2.... The guy who runs the dyno says that with a 928 S2 AUTO the calculation for crank to rwp is calculated on around 7% loss ????
That seems a little low to me ??? Id love the figures but id prefer them to be correct ...
Any help appreciated![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
All the best Brett![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
928 S2 AUTO V8 4.7 LTR 1986 IRIS METALLIC BLUE WITH PROMAX CHIPS, RMB, KICKDOWN SWITCH.
Sorry to alter the thread slightly but I think its relevant
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
On SUNDAY 4th DECEMBER here in UK I am going to a dyno day at Silverstone,its run by Porsche 1 so various Porsches will be there .
Most are short of 2 cylinders of course
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
But myself and 1 other 928 S4 will be there
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The dyno is 1000 hp by the way (so they say) so the supercharged monster should be fine on it
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I have 2 questions maybe someone can help with....
1,....My car was a theoretical 310 bhp to start with....now have added Promax Chips ,Rmb and Nology leads...
What do you think the RWHP will or SHOULD BE ?
2.... The guy who runs the dyno says that with a 928 S2 AUTO the calculation for crank to rwp is calculated on around 7% loss ????
That seems a little low to me ??? Id love the figures but id prefer them to be correct ...
Any help appreciated
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
All the best Brett
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
928 S2 AUTO V8 4.7 LTR 1986 IRIS METALLIC BLUE WITH PROMAX CHIPS, RMB, KICKDOWN SWITCH.
#40
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Damm that S/C is HUGE.....17psi...in a Euro motor (okay a 8-1 euro motor)....430hp at 5K....I would guess 50 more at 6K? Impressive...I would like to see a dyno chart to see the power/torque curves!
Its good to see the fuel system on an OB can support that kind of power!
Its good to see the fuel system on an OB can support that kind of power!
#41
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting to see how a 17 psi of boost on a supercharged 8:1 compression 5 liter 928 engine compares powerwise fairly well to a 2.5 liter 8:1 compression turbocharged 951 engine.
Here is a 341rwhp dynosheet for a 951 with a Vitesse stage 3 turbo and MAF-kit running 17 psi:
![](http://www.vitesseracing.com/Catalog/944_951_968/Performance_Kits/Stage_III/a_S3_17psi001_1.gif)
And here is one 533 rwhp sheet with 24-25 psi on a car with the same turbo but headwork, 3" exhaust, andial cam (not optimal) and Speedforceracing headers:
![](http://www.vitesseracing.com/Catalog/944_951_968/Performance_Kits/Stage_III/a_S3_hdr_DynoChart24psiC.jpg)
Imagine what kind of power a well built 5 liter 8:1 compression twin turbo 928 could put out..
Here is a 341rwhp dynosheet for a 951 with a Vitesse stage 3 turbo and MAF-kit running 17 psi:
![](http://www.vitesseracing.com/Catalog/944_951_968/Performance_Kits/Stage_III/a_S3_17psi001_1.gif)
And here is one 533 rwhp sheet with 24-25 psi on a car with the same turbo but headwork, 3" exhaust, andial cam (not optimal) and Speedforceracing headers:
![](http://www.vitesseracing.com/Catalog/944_951_968/Performance_Kits/Stage_III/a_S3_hdr_DynoChart24psiC.jpg)
Imagine what kind of power a well built 5 liter 8:1 compression twin turbo 928 could put out..
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#42
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by BRETT AINLEY
2.... The guy who runs the dyno says that with a 928 S2 AUTO the calculation for crank to rwp is calculated on around 7% loss ????
That seems a little low to me ??? Id love the figures but id prefer them to be correct ...
That seems a little low to me ??? Id love the figures but id prefer them to be correct ...
#44
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Princeton, NJ, USA
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok. Thanks to all for an answers. Now, I believe when I will get a dyno sheet I will "read" it correctly![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
P.S. I still kind of don't get why HP to RPM axis are not good for integration and HP to time is better? Like, logically, what I would do for the graph #2 Mr. Hansson attached, I would devide it into exponential function and 3 parabolas. Find the areas under, add them, and then get the area... Graph#1 I would devide into two lines, do the same thing. Then compare the areas...
What I find cool about this is that it actually accounts how much time you spend in a particular hp range... If we compare 12000rpm car and 5000rpm car, and peak hp for the second one will be 1.5 times higher, we still will call the first car more "powerfull" becouse it will spend more time in the correct hp range and will better behave on track. That might be an answer to why weaker 2005 911 is quicker to 60 then more powerfull Corvette. Math, math, math...what a great tool![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks,
KLim
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
P.S. I still kind of don't get why HP to RPM axis are not good for integration and HP to time is better? Like, logically, what I would do for the graph #2 Mr. Hansson attached, I would devide it into exponential function and 3 parabolas. Find the areas under, add them, and then get the area... Graph#1 I would devide into two lines, do the same thing. Then compare the areas...
What I find cool about this is that it actually accounts how much time you spend in a particular hp range... If we compare 12000rpm car and 5000rpm car, and peak hp for the second one will be 1.5 times higher, we still will call the first car more "powerfull" becouse it will spend more time in the correct hp range and will better behave on track. That might be an answer to why weaker 2005 911 is quicker to 60 then more powerfull Corvette. Math, math, math...what a great tool
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks,
KLim
#45
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mulik51
P.S. I still kind of don't get why HP to RPM axis are not good for integration and HP to time is better?
The problem with RPM versus hp is that it is decpetive. In reality the car spends proportionately more time at lower torque points. This causes the average power applied to be less than might be thought if you just looked at the curve between the shift point RPMs.