Club Sport Wheels available
04-15-2005, 01:53 AM
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea (the South one)
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Club Sport Wheels available
When I was going after my set of CS wheels, I had two seperate sets lined up, one of which I already hae acquired.
Out of a desire to do a small good deed, would anyone be interested in the other set? According to the current owner they are 16x7J ET65 front and 16x9J Et 52.3 rears. Since my set is 65 and 60 respectively, I'll settle for more offset and adjust if I need to. I'd actually like both sets but I just can't seem to justify the expense or the greed.
Out of a desire to do a small good deed, would anyone be interested in the other set? According to the current owner they are 16x7J ET65 front and 16x9J Et 52.3 rears. Since my set is 65 and 60 respectively, I'll settle for more offset and adjust if I need to. I'd actually like both sets but I just can't seem to justify the expense or the greed.
04-15-2005, 06:46 AM
#4
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Berkshire. 'Old' England. U.K.
Posts: 465
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeufelHei
.... According to the current owner they are 16x7J ET65 front and 16x9J Et 52.3 rears.
The front 16x7 would be a 944 wheel, the 928 CS front wheel is 16x8. They all have a P/N on the back which can then be found on the PET.
04-15-2005, 07:07 AM
#5
Rennlist Member
Have no recall of a CS 9x16 with an ET other than 60mm - so 52.3 mm may be unique ....... : The D90 GT rear was 9x16 ET 52 - but the matching front was 7.5"
As mentioned, part numbers would clarify the source.
As mentioned, part numbers would clarify the source.
04-15-2005, 07:35 AM
#6
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Berkshire. 'Old' England. U.K.
Posts: 465
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Garth S
.....: The D90 GT rear was 9x16 ET 52 - but the matching front was 7.5"
As mentioned, part numbers would clarify the source.
As mentioned, part numbers would clarify the source.
The D90 for the '90 GT is a completely different wheel & in '90 they did away with the spacer the '89 GT had, hence the different back spacing.
04-15-2005, 09:51 AM
#7
Martin,
Could you please contact me by email, please ?
I don’t want to pollute this forum with our problem…
Thanks in advance.
I apologize for the others but I have no other way to hope a reply from Martin.
Regards,
Samuel
Could you please contact me by email, please ?
I don’t want to pollute this forum with our problem…
Thanks in advance.
I apologize for the others but I have no other way to hope a reply from Martin.
Regards,
Samuel
Trending Topics
04-15-2005, 01:13 PM
#8
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seoul, Republic of Korea (the South one)
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are indeed wheels from a 944 Turbo S. The seller (assuming he still has them) was looking for $900 plus shipping/handling.
I purchased mine from another Turbo S owner, the PNs are:
Front 951.362.115
Rear 928.362.119
As I understand things, the Turbo S offset for the rears were standardized at 52.3 in the later (in this case 1989) variety. SInce they can get away with higher offsets with spacers, it makes sense.
I'd love to find a pair of 928 CS fronts in 16x8" but I doubt anyone wants to part with them.
I purchased mine from another Turbo S owner, the PNs are:
Front 951.362.115
Rear 928.362.119
As I understand things, the Turbo S offset for the rears were standardized at 52.3 in the later (in this case 1989) variety. SInce they can get away with higher offsets with spacers, it makes sense.
I'd love to find a pair of 928 CS fronts in 16x8" but I doubt anyone wants to part with them.
