Water pump idler pulley: function?
I have a plan for an automatic timing belt tensioner and the idler pulley can stay or go, but I'm wondering if it is necessary.
My plan is as follows:
*Remove tensioner assembly and tensioner arm.
*Mount aluminum plate onto tensioner bolts to hold new assembly and new (welded steel bar) air pump bracket.
*Mount original tensioner pulley on fixed plate, with limited adjustment for initial (loose) tensioning.
*A new idler pulley on a lever arm, with a spring for resistance, and hydraulic damper provides constant tension and resonance damping.
The new pulley would likely be located near the center of the distance between the cam gear and the original tensioner pulley.
What I'm considering is, depending on the eventual angle of the belt, the water pump idler pulley, if retained, might be driven constantly. So I'm wondering out loud if it could be removed.
Eventually, an automatic tensioner would allow for a variable-with-rpm advance pulley on the other side of the crank gear (like my original fixed advance pulley - V1).
jp 83 Euro S AT 48k
The idler is only there to tame the harmonic dance of the belt spans as the engine does some pretty wild rpm changes.
...
I keep coming back to a pic I took of a busted A6 engine, specifically it's tensioner assembly:

The spring loaded, hydraulically damped tensioner (lower left) pushes against the arm (gold), which acts on an offset post on the back of the tensioner pulley, rotating it to keep tension.
I think I the assembley could fit, at a different angle, in place of the 928 arm and pulley...
Anyhu, check out the manual tensioner and lack of water pump idler pulley on the ca.1974 test engine:

click pic for larger
I was just considering doing a similar sliding plate setup, but with the Audi tensioner.
Perhaps the idler is just to keep the belt away from the tensioner arm?



