for those of you who have taken your 5spd to the limit...
#16
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
mark,
5 spots, wow! i'll have to watch that video again. quite a scramble at the start.
you were definitely in the right with galati if my humble opinion counts for anything.
5 spots, wow! i'll have to watch that video again. quite a scramble at the start.
you were definitely in the right with galati if my humble opinion counts for anything.
#17
Rennlist Member
HP does not break parts...torque does.
Skinny tires are a low cost "safety" valve for torque.
3/4th gears are the weakest due to the distance from the bearing carriers...least amount of gear support...etc.
Marc
500rwtq
Skinny tires are a low cost "safety" valve for torque.
3/4th gears are the weakest due to the distance from the bearing carriers...least amount of gear support...etc.
Marc
500rwtq
#18
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is some awesome positive response. Thanks to all you high-torquers for the responses.
Personally, i've broken a CV-joint before under a wheel-hop situation (hard launch), but that was BEFORE the supercharger. Since the SC, i've not had any issues.
Personally, i've broken a CV-joint before under a wheel-hop situation (hard launch), but that was BEFORE the supercharger. Since the SC, i've not had any issues.
#20
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
"A question for Mark Anderson, the third gear you broke was that in a GT box or was that an earlier type box such as a G10,11,12,13?"
It was a while back but I believe it was a G28:10. The GTS box I have been using has never had a failure.
It was a while back but I believe it was a G28:10. The GTS box I have been using has never had a failure.
#22
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by mspiegle
This is some awesome positive response. Thanks to all you high-torquers for the responses.
Personally, i've broken a CV-joint before under a wheel-hop situation (hard launch), but that was BEFORE the supercharger. Since the SC, i've not had any issues.
Personally, i've broken a CV-joint before under a wheel-hop situation (hard launch), but that was BEFORE the supercharger. Since the SC, i've not had any issues.
Just and idea/thought/theory. Perhaps put a restrictor in the vac line on your by- pass valve. If my thinking is correct it should increase the amount of time it takes for the byapss valve to slam shut as well as the speed at which it closes. Both of which will ease the onset of full TQ at LOW Rpm.
IMHO, Im not worried about it...becasue at this point
Skinny tires are a low cost "safety" valve for torque.
Check this Cobra out. Sub 11sec on an Apten Eaton. Look at his boost gauge. No lag there!
http://www.carvidhost.com/vids/venomous.mpg
Pretty good shifttiing as well!
Last edited by Tony; 08-03-2004 at 09:59 PM.
#24
Dang - that poor stock-appearing Cobrastang got smoked - by a chute-packing dragster. I wonder if there was a staggered start or if he really beat the racecar off the line and halfway down the track? 10:99 with barely maintaining control, that's some heavy duty street muscle.
Any of you SC 928 guys get that squirrely under boost?
Any of you SC 928 guys get that squirrely under boost?
#25
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uh, the only reason we don't pull 11 second quarters is we are running street tires and have 2.X rear ends...
Our supercharged cars are in the same class as that 'stang, except with with lots more class!
I'd run him through the *mile* any day.
Our supercharged cars are in the same class as that 'stang, except with with lots more class!
I'd run him through the *mile* any day.
#26
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Tony,
Nice video, that car hauls some serious ***.
@JEC_31
Neither me nor Andy have much issue. The 928 seems to be pretty stable and predictable. Lots of wheelspin and forward movment. Not much else.
Is it the general opinion that the GTS tranny is better than the GT tranny, which is better than the S3/S4 tranny which is better than the old 16v?
Nice video, that car hauls some serious ***.
@JEC_31
Neither me nor Andy have much issue. The 928 seems to be pretty stable and predictable. Lots of wheelspin and forward movment. Not much else.
Is it the general opinion that the GTS tranny is better than the GT tranny, which is better than the S3/S4 tranny which is better than the old 16v?
#27
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Redondo Beach, CA>>>>Atlanta,GA
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike,
Keep the drag radials on. I'll be back with the G-tech tonight. I' would like to get oyur 0-60 time. Can you send the link to log in to my supermodel e-mail to my hotmail address? ....never able to remember it.
Tony,
Interesting idea, I've thought of using a vacuum reservoir and a soleniod valve to controll the By-pass valve. Are you still in NM?
FWIW guys the BF Goodrich drag radials I've have are not big at all. They are 265s and are the same size as normal 265s. Very soft with a soft sidewall though.
This is a link to the drag radials at work. This is the 220k mi 87S4 witht he Autorotor. It is a 12.7xx sec run. BTW I drove this car from LA to Atlanta in about 36hrs. I had absolutely no problems with the car or the SC besides a loose hose clamp. I even crossed the Mojave, climbing from sea level to around 5000ft in 100+ heat. I averaged close to 80 on I40 (75 and 70 mph limit) and got 19 mpg with the AC on about half the time.
Andy K
Keep the drag radials on. I'll be back with the G-tech tonight. I' would like to get oyur 0-60 time. Can you send the link to log in to my supermodel e-mail to my hotmail address? ....never able to remember it.
Tony,
Interesting idea, I've thought of using a vacuum reservoir and a soleniod valve to controll the By-pass valve. Are you still in NM?
FWIW guys the BF Goodrich drag radials I've have are not big at all. They are 265s and are the same size as normal 265s. Very soft with a soft sidewall though.
This is a link to the drag radials at work. This is the 220k mi 87S4 witht he Autorotor. It is a 12.7xx sec run. BTW I drove this car from LA to Atlanta in about 36hrs. I had absolutely no problems with the car or the SC besides a loose hose clamp. I even crossed the Mojave, climbing from sea level to around 5000ft in 100+ heat. I averaged close to 80 on I40 (75 and 70 mph limit) and got 19 mpg with the AC on about half the time.
Andy K
#28
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by GoRideSno
Tony,
Interesting idea, I've thought of using a vacuum reservoir and a soleniod valve to controll the By-pass valve. Are you still in NM?
Interesting idea, I've thought of using a vacuum reservoir and a soleniod valve to controll the By-pass valve. Are you still in NM?
Yeah, as far as the vac restriictor, i dont see why it wouldnt work. It would take some trail and error to get it right i think. Like i said, im personally not going to mess with it as i think the bit of tire slippage present and the beefy S4 auto tranny should be able to handle it. Besides, my main goal and reason for the TwinsScrew is Low end grunt, a quick street car and gettign rid of that 2nd gear 30mph area of "foot to the floor and nothing"
#29
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Tony, you might want to check out the RMJ Aero Air-Oil separation system I have used on the Bastard and Goldmember. It is an off the shelf item and works quite well. A stainless steel pot scrubber can work well too, but you have to build it!
#30
Is it the general opinion that the GTS tranny is better than the GT tranny, which is better than the S3/S4 tranny which is better than the old 16v?
Well from my homework I came up with this, the GT and GtS boxes are both very strong and have special gears. The GTS is the pick of the bunch because of it's oil cooler and cross drilled pinion. These changes could possibly be made to a GT box. A interesting point is the numbering of the gearboxes. Starting with the first borg warner style box that came in the 85 The G10 in then went G11 , G12 ,G13. Which was upto S4.There were minor changes made in each box.
The Gt jumps to G55 because of the major changes to essentially everything. It has specially ground ring and Pinion and the gears are made from a high grade crmo steel, then they are shotpeened with metal shot. Many other minor changes chucked in too. I would go looking for a GT or GTS box if you were going to punish it.