Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Clutch fork questions (951 vs. 944)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2013, 06:22 PM
  #1  
SirLapsalot
Pro
Thread Starter
 
SirLapsalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 745
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default Clutch fork questions (951 vs. 944)

Is there a difference between clutch forks from different years and models.

I have three clutch fork and clutch lever shafts. One out of an 89 NA, one out of an 88 951 and one out of an 86 951. I am doing an clutch in a 951 and would like to use the clutch fork and lever with the least wear but am unclear on if there is a difference between an NA and 951.

The 89 NA and the 86 951 clutch forks have part number 931.116.835.1R
The 88 951 fork is too hard to read but looks like xxL.116.835.xx

Each is also marked with another cast number 1, 2, or 3 below the part number. Any parts experts here? Are all of these 951 clutch forks? Was there ever a difference between the 951 and 944 fork?

According to this post there potentially was??
https://rennlist.com/forums/10104809-post12.html

pics of what I have below. From left to right came out of, 89 NA, 88 951, 86 951
Attached Images  
Old 09-05-2013, 07:02 PM
  #2  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,445
Received 94 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

they are different

https://rennlist.com/forums/4807126-post11.html

https://rennlist.com/forums/4805284-post9.html
Old 09-05-2013, 08:34 PM
  #3  
SirLapsalot
Pro
Thread Starter
 
SirLapsalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 745
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Appreciate the response but those posts don't give me the whole story. Got the link to the whole thread? I will look closer at mine later but I was waking out the door and was hoping to get some info from the gurus here. Same materials? Different materials? Different geometry? Why, aren't the release bearings the same? Doesn't seem to be anymore reinforcement between any of them
Old 09-05-2013, 08:41 PM
  #4  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,445
Received 94 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The 944 turbo fork arms are thinner also the opening between the arms is smaller on the 944na, you need to measure them with a caliper. I have argued that you could you a 944 na fork if you remove some material from the inner side of the arms to match the size of the turbo
Old 09-05-2013, 08:42 PM
  #5  
SirLapsalot
Pro
Thread Starter
 
SirLapsalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 745
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
The 944 turbo fork arms are thinner also the opening between the arms is smaller on the 944na, you need to measure them with a caliper. I have argued that you could you a 944 na fork if you remove some material from the inner side of the arms to match the size of the turbo
Interesting. Thanks. I will have to measure when I get home
Old 09-05-2013, 10:15 PM
  #6  
Oddjob
Rennlist Member
 
Oddjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest - US
Posts: 4,691
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Yeah, my guess is that they are the same forging, and the Turbo fork is machined for a slightly larger TO bearing. So I agree that you could have an N/A, S, S2 fork machined for use in a Turbo (for the larger diam. TO bearing).

The turbo clutch assembly is little larger/heavier duty. Larger OD flywheel, clutch disc, and pressure plate, so the TO is a little heavier too. Fork is machined to fit.



Quick Reply: Clutch fork questions (951 vs. 944)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:03 AM.