Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What do you think of these numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2002 | 11:40 PM
  #1  
Minh Pho's Avatar
Minh Pho
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Post What do you think of these numbers?

Cylindar 1,2,3,4
Compression 150,150,135,140
Leakdown 3%,1%,5%,5%

Are those numbers reasonable for a 2.7 liter sleeved 951 engine with 4000 miles? or do I have something to be concerned about? Thanks.

Minh
Old 01-21-2002 | 11:54 PM
  #2  
John Anderson's Avatar
John Anderson
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Post

HI Minh,

I'm a little concerened with your lowest reading in #3 and its brother #4. Who did the test? Hmmm..THey seem a little low for a 4000 mile motor. My stock 2.5 had over 200K and the pistons were very loose but my percentage was much tighter than that.

Give me a call at the shop. I'd like to ask a few question if you don't mind.

Take Care!
Old 01-22-2002 | 12:04 AM
  #3  
Minh Pho's Avatar
Minh Pho
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Post

I forgot to mention. After driving 50 miles to the shop, my car was off for about 45 minutes (turned on and idled here and there for a few minutes at a time) before running the compression test and about an hour and a half before the leakdown. Could the results be skewed because the car was not at operating temperature? Thanks.

Minh
Old 01-22-2002 | 12:06 AM
  #4  
Perry 951's Avatar
Perry 951
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,915
Likes: 70
From: Kansas City
Post

They should still be closer than that. Perhaps a 5psi diffrence from cold and hot.

#3 is a bit funny...
Old 01-22-2002 | 12:09 PM
  #5  
Bill's Avatar
Bill
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 7
From: A suburb of Silicon Valley, CA
Post

Mihn,

Everything I have read says that all cylinders should be within 10% of each other.

Your #3 is on the ragged edge.

With a new engine you can see differences, but after 2,000 mi everything should be worn in.

I would be concerned with your readings after 2,000 miles. I would venture to say that after 4,000 miles your problem would only get worse and not better. It would be my guess that your engine idles and runs rough, due to #3 not doing its job.

We just installed a remanufactured engine in our Ford Aerostar and it ran rough from day one. After 1,500 miles the shop did a compression check and one cylinder was low. They contacted the engine remanfacturer and they said that after 2,000 miles if it was not within spec. that they would replace it.

The engine gets pulled today.



Quick Reply: What do you think of these numbers?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:25 AM.