944 front speaker fitment
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
944 front speaker fitment
Hey,
I am looking to replace the front speakers in my 87 944S. They seem to sit in a pretty standard 4 x 6" enclosure, although from memory I recall there were depth issues. Years ago, I put a set of Pyle Drivers in which fit without any hassle.
Yet Crutchfield tells me they have nothing that fits -- on their site and speaking with their call center. Can anyone recommend a speaker that fits? Anything from Polk, for example?
I'm also replacing the rears, have the panels off and old ones removed. Any concerns with fitting 4 x 6 or 6 x 6 speakers in the rear? Again, put a pair of Alpine 4 x 6 speakers there many years ago.
Kevin
I am looking to replace the front speakers in my 87 944S. They seem to sit in a pretty standard 4 x 6" enclosure, although from memory I recall there were depth issues. Years ago, I put a set of Pyle Drivers in which fit without any hassle.
Yet Crutchfield tells me they have nothing that fits -- on their site and speaking with their call center. Can anyone recommend a speaker that fits? Anything from Polk, for example?
I'm also replacing the rears, have the panels off and old ones removed. Any concerns with fitting 4 x 6 or 6 x 6 speakers in the rear? Again, put a pair of Alpine 4 x 6 speakers there many years ago.
Kevin
#3
Burning Brakes
The Polk Db461 do fit in the front depth wise but you need late style mesh grilles to clear the tweeter.
I tested them when i installed my speakers last year but ended up using round 3.5" Polk Db351 in the front because i had to use the normal grilles in order to clear my manual window winders . With electric windows that's not a problem. I've put the Db461 in the back .The polks sound very very good , i also had new alpines before but they sound no where near as good .
You could get OE grilles but they have a tendancy to pop off the frame and are also expensive ,i prefer some aftermarket solution ,see the links. OE part numbers are 944.555.149.00.01C for the grille and 944.555.159.00 the frame .
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-BLACK-DE...16%26rk%3D1%26
I tested them when i installed my speakers last year but ended up using round 3.5" Polk Db351 in the front because i had to use the normal grilles in order to clear my manual window winders . With electric windows that's not a problem. I've put the Db461 in the back .The polks sound very very good , i also had new alpines before but they sound no where near as good .
You could get OE grilles but they have a tendancy to pop off the frame and are also expensive ,i prefer some aftermarket solution ,see the links. OE part numbers are 944.555.149.00.01C for the grille and 944.555.159.00 the frame .
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2-BLACK-DE...16%26rk%3D1%26
#4
I just put in MB Quart 4x6 DKD series all around, but good luck finding any- they are discontinued and it took me 6 months per pair to hunt them down on eBay. You can invert the front spacers and remove the grills like I did to make them fit. They stand out several millimeters as a result but work fine. Had mine this way for several months now.
I'd go with the Polks if I did it all over again. ^
I'd go with the Polks if I did it all over again. ^
#5
Today I got
My Custom Title
Rennlist Member
My Custom Title
Rennlist Member
I have a pair of perfect year old pioneer speakers that fit just fine in the holes. I can sell em to you if you'd like.
#6
Three Wheelin'
Depth is the biggest issue but its combined with the problem of not being able to build out too far due to speakers hitting dash edge. I fitted some Sounstream 4 x 6 speakers but had to remove the rubber boot around the magnet, and I also had to use 6mm MDF baffle and the SS grilles(due to tweeter extending too far to use factory grilles).
The SS speakers sound OK due to using a soft dome silk tweeter, where as all the other speakers I found in this size, used polyester tweeters, that sound crap IMO. By my standards my speakers still sound pretty ordinary but are the best a of a very limited bunch.
At some point down the track I will probably fit some real speakers and do a custom build out on the doors but have other priorities at the moment. Most ppl would probably be more than happy with my set up but as I was in car audio for over 30 years and at one point built the finest sounding car in the country, it isn't as good as I am used too.
Bottom line with any system is as long as it sounds good to you, jobs done
peace
Cyberpunky
The SS speakers sound OK due to using a soft dome silk tweeter, where as all the other speakers I found in this size, used polyester tweeters, that sound crap IMO. By my standards my speakers still sound pretty ordinary but are the best a of a very limited bunch.
At some point down the track I will probably fit some real speakers and do a custom build out on the doors but have other priorities at the moment. Most ppl would probably be more than happy with my set up but as I was in car audio for over 30 years and at one point built the finest sounding car in the country, it isn't as good as I am used too.
Bottom line with any system is as long as it sounds good to you, jobs done
peace
Cyberpunky
#7
Burning Brakes
Just looked up the Soundstream sst4.6 ,they look great and can handle a lot of power and they are also cheap.They would go very nice in the back and with the Polk Db461 in the front would make a great combination while still keeping the stock look .
Polks have silk-polymer dome tweeters ,don't know what difference it makes but personally i really like how they sound.
Polks have silk-polymer dome tweeters ,don't know what difference it makes but personally i really like how they sound.
Trending Topics
#8
I just put in Rockford Fosgate P1462 speakers in the front and back. They sound incredible along with the JL Audio Sub I added. They fit but there was a small amount of trimming to get them in. The metal on the right side of the speaker hole had to be cut.
#9
Just looked up the Soundstream sst4.6 ,they look great and can handle a lot of power and they are also cheap.They would go very nice in the back and with the Polk Db461 in the front would make a great combination while still keeping the stock look .
Polks have silk-polymer dome tweeters ,don't know what difference it makes but personally i really like how they sound.
Polks have silk-polymer dome tweeters ,don't know what difference it makes but personally i really like how they sound.
#10
Burning Brakes
#11
That would be interesting. And really, with as much road and engine noise as most cars have, it doesn't matter as much as it would in a proper home system. This is why I've never bothered to upgrade the BOSE system in my Audi- it's plenty good enough and not really worth improving.
#12
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Catalin, everyone else,
Thanks very much for the ideas and experiences. I'm going to try the Polk db461 front and back. Have a note into my parts guy to see whether the OE M651 covers and frames are still available -- I have the original grey-beige covers at present.
Cheers,
Kevin
Thanks very much for the ideas and experiences. I'm going to try the Polk db461 front and back. Have a note into my parts guy to see whether the OE M651 covers and frames are still available -- I have the original grey-beige covers at present.
Cheers,
Kevin
#13
Today I got
My Custom Title
Rennlist Member
My Custom Title
Rennlist Member
I just put in the exact same speakers earlier this month sound awesome, paired up with my P300-1 amp (hidden in tire well) and P3SD4-12 sub
#14
Three Wheelin'
That would be interesting. And really, with as much road and engine noise as most cars have, it doesn't matter as much as it would in a proper home system. This is why I've never bothered to upgrade the BOSE system in my Audi- it's plenty good enough and not really worth improving.
I expect just as good a sound in the car as I do at home and am prepared to do the hard work to get it. Sure its harder than spending some cash and plonking yourself dead centre, and equidistant from a set of home speakers, but because my ears are the same at home and in the car, I choose to have great sound in both. In fact because I have to spend time in my car getting to work and back, my car systems actually get listened to a hell of lot more, than my home system and so provides better value on a dollar per hour listened basis.
I am glad you can settle for the mediocre Bose system in your car and can justify that based on road and engine noise, as I don't have that ability. I have been asked many times why I put such a great sounding system in such a cheap car(my old car), and my answer has always been that the car doesn't listen to it, I do. My expectations and enjoyment of high fidelity music reproduction are the same regardless of the environment I am in, so I have difficulty trying to comprehend why some people are so dismissive of the pursuit of faithful music reproduction in a car. It's not that hard to sound deaden a vehicle and have sufficient power to overcome any road or engine noise and enjoy great sound in a car.
We have the technology, and most of us spend a lot of time in our cars, that is often the only guilt free music listening time we get.
/end rant
Sorry but the whole car audio is a waste of time/money thing really annoys me
peace
Cyberpunky
#15
Not a waste of time, and there was even a time when I spent gobs of money on car audio. I see where you're coming from, and my ears obviously pick up the same quality at home or on the road as yours do. But you can't tell me your car - any car this side of a new Phantom - provides a better soundstage baseline than your home to make it worth a real audiophile damn. That's like saying I can juggle just as good standing still as I can while on a roller coaster. I'd like to see how. Yes, engine noise, road noise, the idiot in the Civic next to you, a semi truck, an ambulance (hell, the acoustics of the transmission tunnel that get in the way)... all challenges in a mobile environment. When someone honks a horn and interrupts the meticulous unplugged guitar blitz that Monty Montgomery is throwing down, THAT is time wasted to me. Because screw that horn guy. I save my focus for the living room when I can stare in amazement at my speakers in front of me and holding a single malt scotch.
That said, there's a reason I still splashed out for an MB Quart setup in my 951 and am looking at perhaps an a/d/s/ amp. But anything above that I believe it's wasted money on details I - and you - will never really hear in playback unless your idea of car audio is just sitting inside the thing in your garage at night (with the engine off obviously). And last I checked, it was difficult getting a vacuum tube amplifier and audiophile LP transport balanced and mounted properly in the passeger seat anyway.
To each their own- much respect for your interesting past accomplishments in this arena. I love the thought of hi-fi and cars, it's just never seemed like a 10/10ths idea that I wanted to personally invest more than several hundred bucks in.
That said, there's a reason I still splashed out for an MB Quart setup in my 951 and am looking at perhaps an a/d/s/ amp. But anything above that I believe it's wasted money on details I - and you - will never really hear in playback unless your idea of car audio is just sitting inside the thing in your garage at night (with the engine off obviously). And last I checked, it was difficult getting a vacuum tube amplifier and audiophile LP transport balanced and mounted properly in the passeger seat anyway.
To each their own- much respect for your interesting past accomplishments in this arena. I love the thought of hi-fi and cars, it's just never seemed like a 10/10ths idea that I wanted to personally invest more than several hundred bucks in.