Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would it be fair to say that Porsche hates the 944?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2011, 10:57 AM
  #46  
PorscheDoc
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
PorscheDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Under Your Car
Posts: 8,058
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racer
Not sure any dealer really wants to work on a 25 year old car, regardless of marque, with perhaps Mercedes being the exception. They just don't often have the employees (techs) who are are still familiar with the cars. They may not even have certain specialized tools for older models. They certainly won't have parts sitting on shelves. So, when they take in an old car they need to 1) train their own folks and 2) perhaps tie up shop space while waiting for parts to arrive. Its not a "win win" for the dealer I'd imagine.

Same would be true if you brought in a 356 "what do you mean "adjust the carbs" ? Drum brakes?
That is exactly right. Depending on the dealer, techs are good back about 8-10 years in general. In addition, working on newer cars means you don't have to deal with rusted parts, broken bolts, etc, making the job go quicker.
Old 08-19-2011, 11:44 AM
  #47  
pnbell
Burning Brakes
 
pnbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ballston, VA
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you can afford to take your 944 to the dealership for service... You should buy a Better Car!

Ha ha!
Old 08-19-2011, 11:45 AM
  #48  
andys-944
Pro
 
andys-944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GR Michigan
Posts: 521
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

People can be snobs and dumb people normally are snobs Porsche certainly thought of the 944 as a real Porsche, and as has been said already it pretty much saved them from bankruptcy or being bought by VW (which has now happened).
As for real Porches being rear engined then the 962's and other race cars weren't Porsche's.
So I guess my avatar isn't a real Porsche, it cost over $1 million and no I don't own one just worked on it.
Old 08-20-2011, 02:30 PM
  #49  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
What you're trying to say which i agree is that the:
Boxter
Cayman
Panamera
Cayenne
and lets not forget the carrera gt and the 959 that are one of the best porsches ever made...
arnt "real" porsches... just the 911s are "real" porsches
oh wait the first ever porsche was the 356 which isn't a 911...
As an addendum to my first post on the "real Porsches" I was at the dealer yeaterday to get some parts for my not-a-real-Porsche 951. I got to talking to the managers for a bit. They flat said that without the Cayenne, and the Panamera, and some of the Boxsters, that they would be filling out paperwork for Hyundai . There would not be doors to open for the few 911 guys to walk through.
Old 08-20-2011, 02:45 PM
  #50  
techartisan
Racer
 
techartisan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

NOW these 3 are NOT REAL Porsches. Ours have nothing to fear in legitimacy as long as a few of these are still puttering around....
Old 08-20-2011, 04:01 PM
  #51  
carbongecko
Rennlist Member
 
carbongecko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: san diego, california
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i guess it just individual dealer ships because i have had porsche shops say no and some say yes, i liked the fact that i got turned down from one dealership and as i left a 930 pulled upto me at a light and wanted to show off and i shut it up with my 951. so doesn't the 944 body have as many trophies as the 911 body?
Old 08-20-2011, 04:17 PM
  #52  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

i'm enjoying this ownership experience a lot. driving, fairly easy mantenance schedule and making changes (with a little help from my friends).... add to that, good parts availability from multiple sources = a lot of fun + who cares what Porsche thinks of my car.
Old 08-20-2011, 04:33 PM
  #53  
whalebird
Race Car
 
whalebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains NC.
Posts: 3,993
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The sad truth is that it's not the cars that the shops don't want to work on, it's the customers that these front engined cars bring with them.
Myself being a porsche tech for over 20yrs(factory/dealership/motorsports), these cars are largly a pain because of their owners. Do keep in mind though, that a 944 or any varient is one of the most expensive cars you can own, certainly one of the most expensive Porsches.
Old 08-20-2011, 05:16 PM
  #54  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexasRider

I have said it many times.... When 911 guys tell me that my 951 is not a "real Porsche" I always say, "It costs like a real Porsche."

I just like the front engine car better. And I like the 951..... If I didnt have that I did see a super nice new Boxster Spyder at the dealer. Those arent real Porsches either. Of course I was looking at a Cayenne for my wife. Those arent real Porsches either. And my friend went along and he is ordering a Panamera. Those arent real Porsches either..... So you see I am not likely to ever be let into the "Real Porsche" side anyway.

this.


from 'What will be the collector cars of the 80's' thread on OT....

https://rennlist.com/forums/off-topi...f-the-80s.html


Originally Posted by odurandina

expanding the list out to 10...

1. Ferrari F-40.
2. Porsche 959.
3. Porsche 944 Turbo S.
4. Lotus Esprit T.
5. Ferrari 308/328.
6. Porsche 928 S4.
7. Ferrari GTO ... modified GTO still holds the record as the fastest Ferrari ever (oops).
8. Aston Martin Zagato (first production luxury sedan to eclipse 300 km/hr).
9. Ferrari 512TR (can you believe they built this car until 1996)
10. Porsche 930 T

Originally Posted by Gator_86_951

LOL at the idea of the turbo 944 making the list before the 930. Between me and pops we have both, and the 930 is a much much much better car. The 930 has maybe 30k miles. My 951 is a ****box by comparison, and the build quality shows when you take it apart. I have seat time in both, and if you can't drive a 911 turbo fast, well, maybe you can't drive at all.

Originally Posted by whalebird

The sad truth is that it's not the cars that the shops don't want to work on, it's the customers that these front engined cars bring with them.

Myself being a porsche tech for over 20yrs(factory/dealership/motorsports), these cars are largly a pain because of their owners. Do keep in mind though, that a 944 or any varient is one of the most expensive cars you can own, certainly one of the most expensive Porsches.

sad, but true..... i had the 944 way in front of the 911 because of the handling (944 was also a breakthrough car)... but Gator also has a point... if the build quality of of the 924/944/968 line was more up to par with the *911, it's possible that people would respect our cars just a little more.... maybe.



*i think the 993 is the saviour of the 911.
Old 08-20-2011, 05:26 PM
  #55  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
this.


from 'What will be the collector cars of the 80's' thread on OT....

https://rennlist.com/forums/off-topi...f-the-80s.html

sad, but true..... i had the 944 way in front of the 911 because of the handling of both cars... but Gator has a point... if the build quality of of the 924/944/968 line was more up to par with the 911, it's possible that people would respect our cars just a little more.... maybe.
If this list was rated on build quality there would be no Ferraris or Lotus there and the Audi Quattro Turbo would be top of the list. I always thought that the 944 was over engineered.
Old 08-20-2011, 06:23 PM
  #56  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whalebird
The sad truth is that it's not the cars that the shops don't want to work on, it's the customers that these front engined cars bring with them.
Myself being a porsche tech for over 20yrs(factory/dealership/motorsports), these cars are largly a pain because of their owners. Do keep in mind though, that a 944 or any varient is one of the most expensive cars you can own, certainly one of the most expensive Porsches.

Why is this Whalebird?

Because the maintainance is not done? Or they dont want to do it? Or pay for it? Or neglect? Other?

Why is it "one of the most expensive'? Because of breakdowns? Or design? Or maintainance again??

I would like to hear it from the horses mouth and know once and for all.

Thanks.
Old 08-20-2011, 06:45 PM
  #57  
whalebird
Race Car
 
whalebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains NC.
Posts: 3,993
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A little of all of the above. A 951 can be very expensive; water pump/tb every 30K - I know it's not needed, but often a water pump will go between TBelt jobs. A new belt can upset an old pump. Throw a clutch in there... There is always a litaney of crank sensors/wheel bearings/electrical stuff that may either be design flaws, or their reletive abuse on board a Porsche(location to heat and elements). Yes the demograph of 44 owners is not favorable to the cars. I will be the first to sat that the 44 series of cars was highly developed in a short period of time and are (were) complex cars. The price of admission is low, but maintenance is astounding and parts just keep going up as they become more scarce. I don't offer this as a critiscism...I own a 924S. But I can pull open a random file drawer in the shop, grab the thickest one and it is inveriably a 951. The NA 944 aren't as bad, the 924S is a pretty good little car, and a 968 is pretty damn good also. But looking at it, Porsche spent uber-money developing the 44 and after the 951, took another approach. They simplified the cars systems with the S2 along with the beefier chassis developed for the turbo and finally got it right with the 968.
These are tricky cars for sure and great drivers, but require no less of a commitment from their owner than any other Porsche or exotic.
Old 08-20-2011, 07:47 PM
  #58  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

after 68 k miles running, my 968's maintenance costs have been a joke. on the low side.
Old 08-20-2011, 07:54 PM
  #59  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Thanks Whalebird.

Yeah mine is a 1986 Turbo. I had some ideas about running this car in the Targa Newfoundland before my navigator got on a string of Space Shuttle launches. It got a complete rebuild. It was and is expensive. And now I am almost done with the whole car. With just the suspension replacement left to do and then it is about 80%-90% new as far as mechanicals go. The block, pistons, and rods and the transaxle are still the same. Most of everything else is new. My body and interior were about excellent. Everythng works and works well. 91,000 miles.

Maybe I better be writing up an ebay listing while I can.

The thing is I have seen guys drop $30 or 40,000 in a 911 motor. Of course there is not much else to them.
Old 08-20-2011, 08:07 PM
  #60  
KuHL 951
Hey Man
Rennlist Member

 
KuHL 951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nor Cal, Seal Rock, OR
Posts: 16,514
Received 182 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I think the truth is it's a combo of both the age of the vehicle and ownership profiles. The 944 and 951 seems to attract the 'first Porsche' crowd because they look so nice and are still affordable at first glance but they kill new owners that thought they were getting into the P-car game for cheap. The 944 today is still the classic vehicle to cause slow death by a thousand cuts because it has so many issues that only a seasoned DIY owner can resolve. I had great luck with mine because I kept up on maintenance, read Rennlist/Pelican/Clarke's Garage religiously and did all my own work...without these resources I would have been at the mercy of local shops and that's an ugly picture.

In short I can understand why local Porsche dealers have written off the 944 just like BMW quit caring about the E30 when it was probably the most bulletproof line they ever built IMO...economics 101!


Quick Reply: Would it be fair to say that Porsche hates the 944?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:08 PM.