Suspension change out
#1
Suspension change out
Have just purchased spindles, swing arms, rotors calipers, etc from an '86 951 (thanks Todd)to install on my '83 and need the passenger side alloy A-frame. Also any leads on ball joint replacement. Planning on complete rebuild and powder coat before installing. Also, have set of nearly new drilled rotors for early models.
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,820
Likes: 5
From: Virtually Everywhere...
You can still use the steel arms on your conversion - much less expensive to service, and don't suffer from the ball-joint failure problems of the cast arms. If it were me, I'd do this.
If not, I think I have a good core arm - need to verify (would need new balljoint). There are two kits popular to the list - SSI and KLA - info in the archives regarding each.
Good Luck!
If not, I think I have a good core arm - need to verify (would need new balljoint). There are two kits popular to the list - SSI and KLA - info in the archives regarding each.
Good Luck!
#3
What are the downsides to using steel arms? A lot of people have advised against "backdating" from aluminum to steel, though I am unclear as to the specific drawbacks.
Are steel arms unadvisable for track use? Are the ball joint rebuild kits safe for the track?
Are steel arms unadvisable for track use? Are the ball joint rebuild kits safe for the track?
#4
Well I haven't studied the designs real carefully...but it seems as if the steel is at least equal to that of the aluminium. In addition you can replace the ball joints on the steel arms.
The aluminum is probably a good deal lighter...how much weight is really saved is something I don't know. Maybe people just don't want the extra weight...
The aluminum is probably a good deal lighter...how much weight is really saved is something I don't know. Maybe people just don't want the extra weight...
#5
Blaszak has been making steel arms of the 86 that are stronger then the 86 aluminium arms and stand up to track use. They have the replacable ball joint to boot.
<a href="http://www.blaszakprecision.com/" target="_blank">http://www.blaszakprecision.com/</a>
<a href="http://www.blaszakprecision.com/" target="_blank">http://www.blaszakprecision.com/</a>
#6
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,820
Likes: 5
From: Virtually Everywhere...
The weight difference is very minimal - maybe a few ounces, even with my modified steel arms.
Standard steel arms are fine for street use. For track it is recommended that they be reinforced.
Steel arm ball joints are easily and inexpensively replaceable, are plenty strong, and will allow greater lowering than cast arms (binding occurs at >3 degrees on cast arms)
Rebuilt and even original joints in cast arms, especially when lowered, are a measured risk. Alternatives are very pricey, though most racers "end up there" eventually. Some regions (PCA) will not allow rebuilt arms, or cars lowered past 13" (arch to center).
Standard steel arms are fine for street use. For track it is recommended that they be reinforced.
Steel arm ball joints are easily and inexpensively replaceable, are plenty strong, and will allow greater lowering than cast arms (binding occurs at >3 degrees on cast arms)
Rebuilt and even original joints in cast arms, especially when lowered, are a measured risk. Alternatives are very pricey, though most racers "end up there" eventually. Some regions (PCA) will not allow rebuilt arms, or cars lowered past 13" (arch to center).