Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Low temperature thermostat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2003, 06:26 PM
  #1  
Mouthpiece
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Mouthpiece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Big Easy, Baby!
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Low temperature thermostat?

Living in New Orleans, where it is hot most of the year, I am considering replacing the thermostat on my 944, from the OE 187/192 degree thermostat, to a low-temperature 160 degree thermostat. It is always a little nerve wracking, especially with the AC on, to watch the temp gauge keep going up and wondering when the thermostat is going to open.

It seems like a good idea from a logical standpoint. I was wondering if anyone else has any experience with this and was it a good idea. Does anyone know of any reasons offhand that I should not change the thermostat? Thanks.
Old 03-05-2003, 06:34 PM
  #2  
Matt O.
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Matt O.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: wind-swept heights...
Posts: 10,835
Received 79 Likes on 35 Posts
Post

Yep, definitely. I've heard people go on about how it wears down your fans...

Fans are $35 each from PartsHeaven. An engine is as you might expect alot more.

Also, if you want to really run your engine cool, get a new radiator (not used). Even better, I've heard getting the 951 radiator for the 944 NA helps cooling even more (although I have not done this).

The radiator gets clogged up over the many years. Mine was leaking so it was a moot point, but I'm not even sure if you could clean the used one enough to get the performance you'd get from a new one.

Got mine from Paragon Products!

-Matt
Old 03-05-2003, 09:38 PM
  #3  
F18Rep
Three Wheelin'
 
F18Rep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Well yes I believe there is a very good reason not to do this although my reference for this is not Porsche. I bought a book once called Hotrodding the Big Block Chevrelet. It is really quite a technical book and this subject comes up in the first chapter or so. The author goes to some length (charts, graphs and everything) to prove how even a small downward change to the average operating temperature of an engine accelerates wear dramatically. I'm not nearly so knowledgable or convincing as the author but you might think about it from that perspective.
And BTW, I kinda miss nawlins...Bruce
Old 03-05-2003, 10:08 PM
  #4  
Jay W
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jay W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Changed to the lower temp thermostat 2 years ago and the gauge runs almost at the middle all the time. I feel a whole lot better and the car rarely runs colder than the midpoint on the gauge (after warmup). As far as clogging radiator possibilities causing high water temps, I bought my 87 924 with 26,000 miles and it was running at 3/4 to the redline all the time at that mileage (very unlikely the system could have been clogged already). I didnt bother with the lower temp fan switch and besides the cooling fans dont run all the time now anyway so they are'nt going to wear out either.
Old 03-05-2003, 10:26 PM
  #5  
The DareDevil
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
The DareDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 4,607
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by F18Rep:
<strong>Well yes I believe there is a very good reason not to do this although my reference for this is not Porsche. I bought a book once called Hotrodding the Big Block Chevrelet. It is really quite a technical book and this subject comes up in the first chapter or so. The author goes to some length (charts, graphs and everything) to prove how even a small downward change to the average operating temperature of an engine accelerates wear dramatically. I'm not nearly so knowledgable or convincing as the author but you might think about it from that perspective.
And BTW, I kinda miss nawlins...Bruce</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">That is absolutely true; I don’t go below 180.
Old 03-05-2003, 11:53 PM
  #6  
ringo951
Burning Brakes
 
ringo951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Baton Rouge/New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Terry,
I don't know if I have the stock thermostat or not, but I don't think it is anything special. My temp guage rides below the middle level all times of the year, in traffic with A/C on full. Make sure it is not something else, like the radiator. Good to see a few other guys from down this way on the board. good luck.. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />
Old 03-06-2003, 12:37 AM
  #7  
951Tom
Three Wheelin'
 
951Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Post

160F is too low. Gas mileage will suffer as the computer will think it's not fully warmed up and richen the mixture. I use a 180F thermostat and a stock temp fan switch of 192F. My fans ran all the time with a low temp switch even on the highway. Now the fans cycle on/off properly & the needle is always around the first bar unless I'm stopped.

The worst would be a low temp fan switch and a stock temp thermostat. Your fans would run all the time until you stopped.
Old 03-06-2003, 01:57 PM
  #8  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

If you are going to get the lower thermostat, make sure to get the corresponding lower temp fan switches as well.

Just because the thermo opens up at 160, it doesn't mean that the engine will be running that cool: it will just circulate the coolant sooner.

IMHO, the lower temp thermo and switches are a must for track driven cars: the sooner you get cooling the better.

I've had the lower temp thermo and switches on my car for over a year, and have NEVER experienced any issues with running richer, or engine detonation...yadda yadda stuff.

Also: it is very, very important to flush your coolant out every 3-4 years: after time, the chemicals in the coolant will break down and start literally eating away at your aluminum engine block.

Just my $0.42
-Z.
Old 03-06-2003, 03:00 PM
  #9  
PCinDC
Rennlist Lifetime Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
PCinDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ringo951 - Your late model car has a different dash gauge for temperature than the 924 or early 944's. 2 bar for you is 3 bar on the early dash. 3 bar on the early cars is normal operating temperature. Fans coming on sooner does not increase the actual cooling capacity of the car.
Old 03-07-2003, 06:43 PM
  #10  
Devia
Nordschleife Master
 
Devia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 6,119
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

I would suggest flushing the radiator every 2 years, not 3-4.

My '85 944 temp gauge always ran 1/4 of the way up, never half.

- Julie



Quick Reply: Low temperature thermostat?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:33 AM.