Bad cat...bad cat??
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotch Village, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Bad cat...bad cat??
I’ve been running my 85 NA with a header, glasspack muffler (in place of cat) and stock muffler. No "sniffing" in Nova Scotia, so I don't need the cat. The sound is “just” OK. Still a bit raspier than I like, but the best option so far. However, I’m still willing to try a couple of more configurations. I’m going to replace the stock muffler with a FlowMaster 50. I ran this configuration with a FlowMaster 40 a while ago and it was way too loud. Also I’m willing to try the cat again instead of the glasspack muffler. My question: How restrictive is the factory cat assuming it’s in good shape??
Thanks for all the help, I’ll post my results when I’m done.
Gord.
Thanks for all the help, I’ll post my results when I’m done.
Gord.
#6
I am currently running 2.5" tube with a dynomax race bullet in place of the cat and a flowmaster 40 for a box on an S2. Sounds awesome until you hit about 4000 rpm, then it sounds like hell. Going to frankenstein a new system later this summer using a magnaflow cat and box. Might keep the race bullet to run post cat, but we'll see. Even though it will be the second exhaust I'll be making for this car, still spending less money than for any single after market exhaust. why hasn't any after market co stepped up with a quality system for these cars? heck, there has got to be about 30 different options for 911's
#7
Im running stock header, cat delete (replaced with stainless res) into custom 2.5 catback, ending in a AMG styled glass pack type muffler. sounds ok. its loud outside (from what im told) its only slightly louder then stock inside. Im not crazy over the tone of the rear muffler, so im gonna swap it for an ANSA rear can. I can feel the added high RPM pull with this system