Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why I love GM Representatives

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2008, 10:50 AM
  #16  
ilikemy944
Going with the pack
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
 
ilikemy944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 3,129
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tifo, I'm not sure what you just did to my head, but it hurts.

Thanks.
Old 09-17-2008, 11:05 AM
  #17  
PorscheDude1
On the Radar
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheDude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bel Air, Md.
Posts: 5,013
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

This should help.
Attached Images  
Old 09-17-2008, 11:08 AM
  #18  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Maybe you should have asked why they still use pushrod engines instead of moving to ohc like the rest of the world.
Old 09-17-2008, 11:18 AM
  #19  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,980
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Smokiemon944
Corvettes are designed and built by a division within GM. It is almost its own company. I use the term loosely.
I'm not sure I'd agree with that statement... as much as Marketing likes the idea... Sure, there's the Corvette Team... but there's also a Lambda team, an Epsilon team, etc...

OHC? Well, OHV does help keep the hood lower last I heard, and with the weakest Corvette now putting out like 440hp, they're obviously not hurting for output.

But then, starting that whole discussion makes about as much sense as the guy with the torsion bars poking fun at the guy with the leaf spring, as noted.

Of course, saying it has a leaf spring doesn't automatically mean it's junk; many people assume, incorrectly, that this means it's got a Hotchkiss rear suspension, which is junk IMO (though cheap and effective, and has its place just like the drum brake, which I also personally hate).
Old 09-17-2008, 11:25 AM
  #20  
PorscheDude1
On the Radar
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheDude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bel Air, Md.
Posts: 5,013
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924RACR
I'm not sure I'd agree with that statement... as much as Marketing likes the idea... Sure, there's the Corvette Team... but there's also a Lambda team, an Epsilon team, etc...
Thats cool. That is way I used the term loosely.
Old 09-17-2008, 12:21 PM
  #21  
iloveporsches
Race Director
 
iloveporsches's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gina.kane
Maybe you should have asked why they still use pushrod engines instead of moving to ohc like the rest of the world.
Smaller, lighter, less complicated and make gobs of power. An OHC GM V8 wouldn't fit nicely into the same space as a Porsche slant-4.

There are many different solutions to the same problem that can get the same results. A ZR1 with its inferior leaf springs and pushrod engine will hand any 951 its ***.
Old 09-17-2008, 12:25 PM
  #22  
924RACR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
924RACR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 3,980
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I dunno, last LS1 944 I looked at wasn't too shabby, as far as packaging... heh heh...

The Corvette leaf springs are inferior to... what, exactly?

As for comparing the ZR1 to... well, to most cars on the planet, really, is pretty absurd... but that's a thread that belongs in OT...
Old 09-17-2008, 12:28 PM
  #23  
iloveporsches
Race Director
 
iloveporsches's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 924RACR
I dunno, last LS1 944 I looked at wasn't too shabby, as far as packaging... heh heh...
LS-series engines are still push-rod. An LS3 in a 944 would be ridiculous amounts of fun.

The Corvette leaf springs are inferior to... what, exactly?
Forgot the sarcasm quotes!

As for comparing the ZR1 to... well, to most cars on the planet, really, is pretty absurd... but that's a thread that belongs in OT...
I know, I was just pointing out what they can with leaf springs and OHV engines, and that it isn't inferior or outdated technology.
Old 09-17-2008, 12:46 PM
  #24  
ritzblitz
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
ritzblitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quakertown, PA
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As far as the torsion bar argument goes torsion bars are old technology, used in old cars. Leaf springs are old technology, but Chevy is using them in new cars.

I like where this thread is going. Good discussion...
Old 09-17-2008, 12:46 PM
  #25  
944CS
Drifting
 
944CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Phila.
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

most people who are bashing the leaf springs don't even understand suspension geometry and just assume that because most pick up trucks use leaf springs the corvette must have an antique suspension design. It in fact uses unequal length control arms, this design is what you should be concerned about. The composite leaf spring weighs less than half of what traditional coil springs would, and this weight is positioned lower. Also, in the C5 and C6 the leaf spring also acts as an anti roll bar, which allows the use of a smaller, lighter supplemental anti roll bar.

Race teams use a coil over setup because it's easier to make changes to roll stiffness and ride height, and this greatly outweighs the advantages of a composite leaf spring because they are always making changes to maxmize grip on different tracks and in different track conditions.
Old 09-17-2008, 12:59 PM
  #26  
MAGK944
Nordschleife Master
 
MAGK944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,769
Received 298 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 924RACR
...OHC? Well, OHV does help keep the hood lower last I heard, and with the weakest Corvette now putting out like 440hp, they're obviously not hurting for output.
Very true, I still think of it as old technology though. I am from the Colin Chapman (Lotus) school of thought, small capacity high reving engines in light cars. I also think that it is an easy option to keep increasing capacity rather than improving engine efficiency.
Old 09-17-2008, 01:00 PM
  #27  
iloveporsches
Race Director
 
iloveporsches's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ritzblitz
As far as the torsion bar argument goes torsion bars are old technology, used in old cars. Leaf springs are old technology, but Chevy is using them in new cars.

I like where this thread is going. Good discussion...
Coil springs are also old technology. 15th century.

A spring is a spring. Suspension geometry is what matters!
Old 09-17-2008, 01:23 PM
  #28  
ritzblitz
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
ritzblitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quakertown, PA
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Good call!

I'm not really bashing leaf springs, I just thought that it was interesting how they couldn't really answer my question. Given the amount of knowledge the one guy seemed to have, he probably could have listed a couple reasons why the leaf spring setup is as good, or better than conventional MacPherson strut. But now that I think about it, even if I knew the reasons why, I probably wouldn't have been able to think of them on the fly like that haha.

Another advantage of the transverse leaf spring (I think) is that it's easier to tune than an independent suspension setup??

Yeah so I guess I'm one of those people...
most people who are bashing the leaf springs don't even understand suspension geometry
Old 09-17-2008, 01:25 PM
  #29  
bader$
Burning Brakes
 
bader$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iloveporsches
Coil springs are also old technology. 15th century.

A spring is a spring. Suspension geometry is what matters!
I agree. They tried coil springs on trucks in the 60s and it wasn't a bad idea, just a bad setup.
Old 09-17-2008, 02:04 PM
  #30  
PorscheDude1
On the Radar
Rennlist Member
 
PorscheDude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bel Air, Md.
Posts: 5,013
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ritzblitz
Another advantage of the transverse leaf spring (I think) is that it's easier to tune than an independent suspension setup??
The Vette has IRS, it has since 1963


Quick Reply: Why I love GM Representatives



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:56 AM.