Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rear Spring Rate Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2008, 11:24 AM
  #16  
Z-man
Race Director
 
Z-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North NJ, USA
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks good Greg -- I piece I was missing in your setup was the fact that you run a staggered tire setup, which does contribute a little to understeer.

This past weekend, I was at Thunderbolt / NJMP. A former student hopped in for a ride. He has a similar setup as my car, but with a bit firmer spring rates up front (450) and just helper springs and stock torsion bars in the rear, as well as M030 sways front and rear. Where his car was giving him lots of understeer (in the Octopus), he commented that my car had lots and lots of front end grip. I think the 400 lb sprigs up front (vs. his 450's), plus the bigger Welt rear swaybar was the difference. I also run 245-45/16's at all four corners on 8x16 wheels, and prefer a slightly oversteering attitude for the track.

Suspension setup has a lot to do with driver preference as well as how the car is driven. For example: late brakers / trail brakers may prefer a more understeering car. Slower entry drivers may want some power-on oversteer and set up their cars appropriately. And then there's the AX gang...

Suspensions aren't rocket science, but they are also not 'one size fits all.'

-Z-man.
Old 09-09-2008, 11:47 AM
  #17  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Potomac-Greg
I fully expected understeer for two reasons. First, my track tires (Toyo RA1s)are staggered (235s up front and 255s in back). Second, I went with a combined rear spring rate (t-bars plus coilovers) that is probably no more than (and probably less than) the 400# fronts. Conventional wisdom says this is an understeering setup.

Turns out the car is very neutral.
It may work because with the rear end up it creates oversteer simply due to rake.

Here you are going flat out yet the rear is still a bit high.



Here I am going flat out at 6000 rpm in 3rd.

Here in these two I am going flat out at the top of 4th gear.



You can see the slight rear end low attitude power on.
Old 09-09-2008, 12:41 PM
  #18  
Potomac-Greg
Drifting
 
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Suburban DC
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M758
It may work because with the rear end up it creates oversteer simply due to rake.

Here you are going flat out yet the rear is still a bit high. ...
You can see the slight rear end low attitude power on.
Yeah, I've had that thought. Higher butt, more weight transfer, so the back loosens up. For now, the setup works, it's stable, and I'm still learning at ton.

If/when I'm ready to go to the next level, I'll get the t-bars done and dump the springs. But at that point, I might just sell and buy a fully prepped track car. For the foreseeable future, my track car needs to be street legal and usable as a third car.



Quick Reply: Rear Spring Rate Advice



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:01 PM.