Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which 944 should I buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2008 | 03:20 PM
  #1  
landonrhall's Avatar
landonrhall
Thread Starter
2nd Gear
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Which 944 should I buy?

Hi all. My name is Landon. Brand new to the forum. I've loved Porsches for many years, but never had the opportunity to have one. Well the time has come...

There are two 944's I've got my eye on. Here's the info.

1. 1983 944, 45K original miles , Red/5 speed/ removable sunroof/ Leather/ Alloy rims, and if I remember right from a previous posting, it just had $3k of work done to it. They're asking $5500. I intend to check into what work was just done, but don't know at the moment.

2. 1985 Porsche 944 w/mid year '86 model changes (i.e. 1985.5 model), 98k miles, original owner, only driver, never wrecked, always garaged , documented maintenance, asking $4,800

Thoughts? I love the low miles of No. 1, but everything I read says the 85.5 and later cars are the ones to buy. These sources often point to the nicer interior of the 85.5-and-later cars.

Being that many of you own or have owned 944s, which would you reccomend? What's the better deal here?

Thanks in advance for the advice!

Landon
Old 06-11-2008 | 03:24 PM
  #2  
alex's Avatar
alex
Almost Addicted
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 11
From: behind enemy lines <REDACTED>
Default

I've had both. At this age, the mileage won't stop the corrosion and deterioration of rubber parts (like seals). I'd go with the 85.5. I've had an 84, an 85.5, and currently an 88.
Old 06-11-2008 | 04:47 PM
  #3  
LeMans71's Avatar
LeMans71
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
Default

+1 on the 85.5, but I'd really want to see a receipt for a new clutch and recent timing/balance belt service.
Old 06-11-2008 | 04:56 PM
  #4  
Potomac-Greg's Avatar
Potomac-Greg
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
From: Suburban DC
Default

The low miles might be a plus, but only if the car was properly maintained. I'd take a well maintained 150,000 944 over a 45,000 garage queen that's been maintained under the "fix-it-when-breaks" program.

The later interior versus earlier is a matter of taste. Neither will look particularly impressive compared to a modern car.
Old 06-11-2008 | 04:59 PM
  #5  
Marcquito's Avatar
Marcquito
No, not Mosquito!
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,041
Likes: 0
From: Gliese 581g | Monte-Carlo, Côte d’Azur, La Planète Terre
Default

85.5. The interior is much nicer, the driver position is much more comfortable, the 85.5 is also a bit more refined than the early. You still have the early offset so you can fit some sweet-huge wheels on there, too!
Old 06-11-2008 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
alordofchaos's Avatar
alordofchaos
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 34,276
Likes: 165
From: Mid Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by landonrhall
Hi all. My name is Landon.
Welcome to rennlist, and welcome to the 944 addiction. Funny, but your intro sounds like it came out of an AA meeting. "Hi, my name is Jack. I'm a 944-aholic"
1983 944, 45K original miles
5-digit odometer, so it could easily be 145k. You wouldn't be able to tell from the condition, necessarily. OTOH, it it looks that nice, it probably has been well maintained. However, you don't mention documentation of work with this one. It could have 245,000 miles with a lot of stuff replaced and the paint detailed.

I guess that's lesson 1 about the 944. If you take a $5k 944, put $4k of work into it, you have a 944 that's worth about $5k
2. 1985 Porsche 944 w/mid year '86 model changes (i.e. 1985.5 model), 98k miles, original owner, only driver, never wrecked, always garaged , documented maintenance
This car is cheaper, newer, and has documented maintenance
Old 06-11-2008 | 05:34 PM
  #7  
Mamooguy's Avatar
Mamooguy
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: Taranna
Default

Buy both, give me one.
Old 06-11-2008 | 05:40 PM
  #8  
metal144's Avatar
metal144
Advanced
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Oshawa,Ontario,Canada
Default

944/2 +1.... get the car inspected the investment will save you money in the long run
Old 06-11-2008 | 06:07 PM
  #9  
PXJ800's Avatar
PXJ800
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by alordofchaos
This car is cheaper, newer, and has documented maintenance
I think that's the key. As a newer owner (bought an 84 in January) I'm glad I got something well-documented. Plan for everything not documented to need fixing.

I thought it was just hyperbole and good-natured ribbing when a few people told me the above, as well as "every little plastic part will break on you". No, it was actually sound advice.

things not recently documented when I got the car:
starter motor
A/C
fuel pump
various relays
brakes & rotors

things that needed fixing:
starter motor
A/C
fuel pump
various relays
brakes & rotors

If you have no documentation, you have a much more difficult starting point if you run into a problem.
Old 06-11-2008 | 07:47 PM
  #10  
Tom R.'s Avatar
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 123
From: Mile High
Default

is the 85 a manual? automatics are worth a lot less than manuals.
Old 06-11-2008 | 09:29 PM
  #11  
82-T/A's Avatar
82-T/A
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah, nothing personal, but I can't imagine buying a 944 that would be an automatic. It seems to me, the whole reason why you would buy a 944 over say, a Crown Victoria or a Cadillac Devilla would be for spirited driving, and that would necessitate a manual transmision.
Old 06-11-2008 | 09:36 PM
  #12  
Caboose's Avatar
Caboose
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville NC
Default

I'll be the first to say it, look for a turbo or never drive one no matter which one you get.

Honestly i'd go with the 85 but its all personal preference!
Old 06-11-2008 | 10:21 PM
  #13  
Mamooguy's Avatar
Mamooguy
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: Taranna
Default

More anti-automatic snobbery. How freaking tiresome.
Old 06-11-2008 | 10:46 PM
  #14  
yellowline's Avatar
yellowline
Under the Radar
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,869
Likes: 0
Default

Three major advantages of the 83:

High probability of manual steering. 3 PS 944s have been in my extended family (2 still are), and my 83 is the joy of the bunch to wrench on, at least for front of-engine work. No leaks, no mess in front of the belts.

Manual sunroof. Fewer adjustments, almost no adjustment needed once you have everything all set.

Control arms and balljoints are $40 a side. A basic rebuild kit for aluminum arms will run you double that, and you'll have to have it installed. If you can turn a couple bolts, you're cleared to install balljoints on steel arms.
Old 06-11-2008 | 11:49 PM
  #15  
Vjgtrybno1's Avatar
Vjgtrybno1
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by yellowline
Three major advantages of the 83:

High probability of manual steering. 3 PS 944s have been in my extended family (2 still are), and my 83 is the joy of the bunch to wrench on, at least for front of-engine work. No leaks, no mess in front of the belts.

Manual sunroof. Fewer adjustments, almost no adjustment needed once you have everything all set.

Control arms and balljoints are $40 a side. A basic rebuild kit for aluminum arms will run you double that, and you'll have to have it installed. If you can turn a couple bolts, you're cleared to install balljoints on steel arms.
+1 on the control arms, but you can swap in brand new early style arms on an 85.5 or an 86 (early offset) at an attractive cost.


Quick Reply: Which 944 should I buy?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:05 AM.