Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Potential for an N/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2006, 11:06 PM
  #61  
mnypit944
Instructor
 
mnypit944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deland FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fourside
Thanks alot sir. I am also considering an E36, but it's been hard to get a deal that fits me. I found a '93 325is for a good price and it's in good condition, but it's an automatic. That isn't that big of a deal to me, as I'd probably want to swap out a stock 5-speed from the 325 with a ZF from an M3. I might end up going with this car if he calls me back. I also considered doing an S52 swap, but that's a bit hardcore
I think you will find the guys on the BMW board similar to everyone here. They will tell you not to bother, just to buy an M3 to begin with. I am running a 99 328i Convertible with nothing but the M3 suspension and exhaust, and a cold air intake and short shifter and can keep up in most cases with most M3s. When HP is that close, driver capability and quick shifting is everything.

ANd no that does not mean I street race. I do, however, take everything I own to the drag strip on occasion just to see and my times are close or the same as the M3 drivers that fancy themselves racecar drivers..
Old 04-25-2006, 11:12 PM
  #62  
josephsc
Race Car
 
josephsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Albany, CA: celebrating 100 years of independence from Berkeley, CA
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mnypit944
Oh and just a side note. All of you that pick up those 150k cars cheap, lets hear how much you really had to spend on them in the end.

I have heard horror story after horror story of people buying turbos and having to sink a ton of money in them. Ends up not worth it in the end.
I LOVE the ~150k market. This is the level where potential buyers who do not know these cars back away easily -- precisely because of the potential for the horror story. Not a turbo, but last summer I picked up a 170k miles S2 from a Rennlister, put in maybe $1k in parts to make it really pretty (only $300 came out of my own pocket, most others were parts I already had). A visiting friend's been using it as her daily driver for a year w/o any problems. More recently I picked up a 165k miles 968 cab from a owner who kept fanatical care of the vehicle. The problem with these cars is that once you own it, it's hard to get rid of 'cause no one would buy it from you.

However, like you mention, I would not recommend a 150k mile car unless the person has already been rather intimate with these cars.

And yes, recommendations have to be tailored -- but if you're new here and don't identify yourself, you will get treated like a "newbie" until we get to know you. But once we get to know you, you'll find that we're friendly bunch.

BTW, welcome to Rennlist!
Old 04-25-2006, 11:29 PM
  #63  
mnypit944
Instructor
 
mnypit944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deland FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know enough about these cars to not shy away from a 150k Turbo either if I could find one. Unfortunately they are in the $6k and up range too. However, I would probably not give up my quest to make mine better even after finding one.
Old 04-26-2006, 02:03 AM
  #64  
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Blue S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

150k+ mile Porsches are the enthusiasts best kept secret! HAHA, everything should be new by then! If its still running, its probably not gonna stop yet either! I would not hesitate to buy a super high mileage Porsche as long as I got its history as well. Most people wouldn't dare buy a car with such high mileage!

I have a friend who just bought a super high mileage BMW 3, '94 or '95. Fixed one sensor and the car is brand new! He's put another 30,000 in a year and a half or so and he's having a blast! Just gotta be aware of what you are getting into.
Old 04-26-2006, 08:15 AM
  #65  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by iloveporsches
You'll also lose low end power. And cutting the lengths in half would most likely move the RPM range for the harmonics well above the engine's redline.
well yeah.

bah, you get the idea. shorten and aftten the runners. there.
Old 04-26-2006, 03:28 PM
  #66  
89AZ944
Racer
 
89AZ944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Valley of the Sun
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MnyPit-

If you have mechanic skills and are serious about "upgrading" your 944 for around $4000, something you might want to consider is an engine swap. Look what Matt did with a 968 engine swap:

http://matt.type944.com/3liter944.shtml

Or if American Iron is easier for you to work on look at what can be done with a small block V8:

http://www.renegadehybrids.com/944/944sbc.html

When the 944 turbo came out, the need for "bolt on" performance parts for the NA 944 essentially went away. I think that there are ways to increase HP on an NA and many methods have been described here. But unfortunately the "ease" of "just buy a Turbo" has killed any aftermarket parts for SUBSTANTIAL horsepower/torque gains.

I often wonder if Porsche had not come out with the 951, then perhaps the Callaway turbo kit would still be readily available........
Old 04-26-2006, 03:41 PM
  #67  
apierce918
Addic
Rennlist Member
 
apierce918's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Valley, WI
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

150k mile cars are just getting broken in. mine is now at 202k and i trust it to go anywhere (with fresh meat i would anyway) i bought it at 192k, and have put about 2800$ into it, and its all been preventative/bored/why not purchases, nothing because something was broken... yet :/
Old 04-26-2006, 04:57 PM
  #68  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

My 968 has 155k and it runs so smooth it amazes me. Dad's 928S has like 45k and it is frequently troubled. Moral of the story: history and model are more important than mileage.

My first car was a '81 diesel benz. I drove my mom's 944 once and crashed it. Moral of the story: even a low-hp car can get you into trouble, if you don't know how to drive. Get a car you can learn with, that won't break your heart when you crash it, and that isn't fast enough to kill you when you crash it.
Old 04-26-2006, 07:59 PM
  #69  
mnypit944
Instructor
 
mnypit944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deland FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 89AZ944
MnyPit-

If you have mechanic skills and are serious about "upgrading" your 944 for around $4000, something you might want to consider is an engine swap. Look what Matt did with a 968 engine swap:

http://matt.type944.com/3liter944.shtml

Or if American Iron is easier for you to work on look at what can be done with a small block V8:

http://www.renegadehybrids.com/944/944sbc.html

When the 944 turbo came out, the need for "bolt on" performance parts for the NA 944 essentially went away. I think that there are ways to increase HP on an NA and many methods have been described here. But unfortunately the "ease" of "just buy a Turbo" has killed any aftermarket parts for SUBSTANTIAL horsepower/torque gains.

I often wonder if Porsche had not come out with the 951, then perhaps the Callaway turbo kit would still be readily available........

I read over the 968 conversion and it never finished to see if it ever started. Dissapointing. Would have liked to find out what the problem was and what problems had to be overcome.

A small block in a 944 is like strapping about 300lbs of weight to the nose of the car. Kinda throws off the balance a bit doesnt it?

I have been looking for differant engines to that fit in there. It is not as easy as it sounds to find one in decent shape inexpensively with all the accessories necessary.

People install turbos and superchargers to differant cars all the time. WHy cant we just do this? I understand the compression thing, but if you are careful with your boost, I would think it would work. The only issue I can see is getting enough fuel in there. I cant beleive that would be all that hard on a 23 year old car. The electronics cant be all that complicated, can they?

Anyway, just a thought.
John
Old 04-26-2006, 10:07 PM
  #70  
Mike C.
Drifting
 
Mike C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastern CT
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

L8Apeks, I'd like to hear more about the cam you plan to put in. Is it going to move that power way up in the rev band? Will it significantly impact fuel milage and emmissions? I'd fork over $450 for a cam that gets me 190 hp if it's usable on the street.
Old 04-27-2006, 12:11 AM
  #71  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mnypit944

A small block in a 944 is like strapping about 300lbs of weight to the nose of the car. Kinda throws off the balance a bit doesnt it?
not true. I cant remember which chevy engine it is. lt1 ls1 whatever. but one of em only adds like two pounds to the front of the car.
Old 04-27-2006, 12:26 AM
  #72  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike C.
L8Apeks, I'd like to hear more about the cam you plan to put in. Is it going to move that power way up in the rev band? Will it significantly impact fuel milage and emmissions? I'd fork over $450 for a cam that gets me 190 hp if it's usable on the street.
The JME cam (http://www.jmengines.com/index.htm) claims a realistic 12-18bhp, this is on an otherwise stock engine. The description of the least aggressive cam says 3600-6500rpms is the optimal powerrange with a 900rpm idle. This cam is also $650...not absolutley terribly priced considering i dont plan on selling the car for some time, and an extra ~10+ hp would be nice to have available.

I would really like to hear from anyone who runs the JME cam to let me (us) know the drivability difference compared to an otherwise stock car. I sent JME a email late last night, still waiting on a response. It makes me wonder however if you loose much power in the lower RPM range from this cam however.
Old 04-27-2006, 01:08 AM
  #73  
mavfan
Three Wheelin'
 
mavfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: O'Fallon, IL
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont forget http://webcamshafts.com/ are they any good too? i've thought about it seriously from time to time.
Old 04-27-2006, 10:19 AM
  #74  
mnypit944
Instructor
 
mnypit944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deland FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Campeck
not true. I cant remember which chevy engine it is. lt1 ls1 whatever. but one of em only adds like two pounds to the front of the car.
Must be the LS1. THey are all aluminum. The LT1 is cast iron with aluminum heads and most other small blocks are all cast iron.

Lots of plumbing and electrical. And you have to have a funny looking hood scoop.



Quick Reply: Potential for an N/A?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:49 PM.