Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

questions for those who gutted there cat.(and no, not the 4 legged kind!!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2005, 05:11 PM
  #31  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i dont need to. ask the many racers on the forum running straight exhausts if they have ever burned a valve.

i dont see what you mean helps the valve not float?
the valve opens inward. so if there was backpressure in the exhuast what would happen is it would try to stop the valve from closing. inducing valve float....

and the goal on a turbo is to get higher boost pressure then exhaust back pressure. on a turbo there is no way around the backpressure. but on an na there is. and its certainly not needed and any lack will not reduce hp.

choppy is what causes the resonance. and power. they just have tuned (or by coincidence) the engine to get the intake and exhaust pulses in line with eacth other right after 3k rpm. cause thats when the exhaust sounds like crap. a bunch of spaced out pops. yet thats when the NA gets its kick.

eh. someone needs to take a pressure guage to the exhaust. then make an exhaust that keeps resonance and reduces backflow and compare. until then ppl will not agree.
Old 09-08-2005, 08:04 PM
  #32  
Campeck
Campeck Rulez
Rennlist Member

 
Campeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

interesting how the tests with {(very little) street cars probably have more } backpressure had the most loss and less hp
Attached Images  



Quick Reply: questions for those who gutted there cat.(and no, not the 4 legged kind!!)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:17 PM.