All performance out fo 944na RoW 2.5l
#31
Originally Posted by tifosiman
No offense meant here, but.............
THERE IS NO WAY. Assuming 17% driveline loss, that means your flywheel horsepower is close to a stock 86-88 951 (non-S). That is just not possible with the work you described.
THERE IS NO WAY. Assuming 17% driveline loss, that means your flywheel horsepower is close to a stock 86-88 951 (non-S). That is just not possible with the work you described.
Unlike most people here, I believe 200 bhp is quite possible on a properly developed street 944, but I choke at 230. Perhaps, but I'm doubtful.
#32
Originally Posted by mgmarsh39
then why are you on here, mark with a 93 honda? I owned a mazda and it was crap, so I will assume that jap cars are made of crap. Go figure I am narrow minded. Flame me all you will, but I do not want to end up dead because some kid thought his car was so fast that he had to kill me on the freeway...
-matt
i dont care what you drive
-matt
i dont care what you drive
I will take a riced out Honduah boy any day over a P-car snob like yourself.
#33
There is a guy over here in Norway who insists he can get close to 200HP crank with porting.
200rwhp would mean $$$$ and a car that makes its power high up in the rev range.
Didn't Huntley build a 220HP NA?
200rwhp would mean $$$$ and a car that makes its power high up in the rev range.
Didn't Huntley build a 220HP NA?
#35
Regard Porsche quality vs. Japanese cars, you don't want to go there. The Japanese cars will win hands down. For crying out loud, the 944 interior was put together with glue and tape. I kid you not.
What these cars excel at is performance engineering and tuning. But not quality. I'm not sure I'd even argue overall engineering, what with too many over engineered parts followed by too many silly things that fail on these cars.
What these cars excel at is performance engineering and tuning. But not quality. I'm not sure I'd even argue overall engineering, what with too many over engineered parts followed by too many silly things that fail on these cars.
#36
Originally Posted by aubreym
A chip won't do you much good in an NA. They're primarily for turbo charged motors and all you'll get out of it is a higher red line.
Custom chips built for a specific engine can be useful but that's not the case here.
Custom chips built for a specific engine can be useful but that's not the case here.
DISCLAIMER: This was my personal experience. There are no dyno charts to back this up. Please consult a physician before trying. Do not take with other medication. Occasional side-effects can be experienced, including, but not limited to, diarreah, nasuea, dizziness, anxiety, hives, leprecy, and fits of terrets.
#37
Originally Posted by schnellfahrer
There is a guy over here in Norway who insists he can get close to 200HP crank with porting.
200rwhp would mean $$$$ and a car that makes its power high up in the rev range.
Didn't Huntley build a 220HP NA?
200rwhp would mean $$$$ and a car that makes its power high up in the rev range.
Didn't Huntley build a 220HP NA?
Also, be sure the dynos have the correction factors entered in the dyno or the numbers don't mean anything.
#38
Originally Posted by Geo
What these cars excel at is performance engineering and tuning. But not quality. I'm not sure I'd even argue overall engineering, what with too many over engineered parts followed by too many silly things that fail on these cars.
#40
Originally Posted by tifosiman
(You know that look, where they **** their head to the side and look at you like they are going to pat you on the head and say "You poor thing, everything OK?")
#42
Originally Posted by Fishey
I can make anyones N/A put down 200whp on the dyno and its no BS
Just don't expect it to be cheap
Just don't expect it to be cheap
I won't say it cannot be done, but it's a pretty tall order that nobody seems to have been documented to have done.
#43
If you're really power hungry:
Keep your NA. Save some money up next, and buy a 930. You won't need to mod a 282 HP car that will make you **** yourself at the first moment you lift off the throtttle in a corner.
Keep your NA. Save some money up next, and buy a 930. You won't need to mod a 282 HP car that will make you **** yourself at the first moment you lift off the throtttle in a corner.
#44
Hi !
Cam http://www.jmengines.com/index.htm - 12-18 hp
Pulley http://www.lindseyracing.com/Merchan...y_Code=PULLEYS - 7 hp
Exhaust - with no cat : )
FR wilk chip
That's gonna get you near 2000$
Cam http://www.jmengines.com/index.htm - 12-18 hp
Pulley http://www.lindseyracing.com/Merchan...y_Code=PULLEYS - 7 hp
Exhaust - with no cat : )
FR wilk chip
That's gonna get you near 2000$
#45
Yes the parts you mentioned might only cost 2k but having it instaled / doing the work correctly is going to cost a wee bit more then 2k and if the engine could even hadle it without first doing a compleat cheack to make sure everything is working at factory spec is questionable at best.