Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2004, 02:53 PM
  #1  
SKooT1027
Pro
Thread Starter
 
SKooT1027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Exhaust

I've got a few exhaust questions about 944 n/a's.

1) What size exhaust come stock?
2) Do most people just leave the stock one on?
3) If you change exhausts, can anyone recommend a good one for a fair price. (Prob 3", but whatever you've found to works and sounds nice)
Old 08-06-2004, 03:00 PM
  #2  
Macfreak007
Three Wheelin'
 
Macfreak007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Louisville, Ky/Altanta, GA (Georgia Tech)
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It seems like most people here reccomend Speed Force Racing as a good supplier for an aftermarket exhaust, I'm sure a few people will tell you to go that way, and I have been impressed from what I have seen and heard from them. Personally I would just keep it stock until something goes wrong with it, or you need to replace it. Stock sounds just fine for me, whatever you do don't put anything ricey on the 944, thats the last thing you need! I vote for Stock or SFR if you want to go aftermarket.
Old 08-06-2004, 03:36 PM
  #3  
pearldrum944
Drifting
 
pearldrum944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri Cities, WA
Posts: 3,053
Received 73 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Don't be expecting much power from exhaust. I would just keep stock. I did want a little bit better sound, so I got a cone filter and adapter plate from ebay for like $20. Now I am completely satisfied with the sound.
Old 08-06-2004, 03:48 PM
  #4  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Im pretty sure most recommend not going more than 2.5 inches on the piping as you would loose a fair amount of backpressure running 3 inch pipe. The stock piping diameter is 2.25 inches.

Like Macfreak said, the SFR cat-back sounds great from the videos i have heard. Would defenetley be on my list of modifications once i have a 944. Im not sure what type of gains you would get from removing the catalyic converter. The cat. is also pretty heavy...so you will get some weight savings also .

The stock headers from what i have read are the best for the n/a engine, even aftermarkets arent worth adding.
Old 08-06-2004, 04:06 PM
  #5  
Dave951M
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dave951M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ditto on the backpressure thing. If you go too large in dia on an na exhaust, you'll gain high rpm horsepower, but at the expense of lower rpm torque. Low rpm torque is what makes a car quick, not ultimate hp numbers.
Old 08-06-2004, 04:38 PM
  #6  
buckshot
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
buckshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central wisconsin
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sfr!!!!
you would'nt believe the comments i get!!
buckshot wi
Old 08-06-2004, 04:44 PM
  #7  
Ken D
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ken D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,056
Received 79 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave951M
Ditto on the backpressure thing. If you go too large in dia on an na exhaust, you'll gain high rpm horsepower, but at the expense of lower rpm torque. Low rpm torque is what makes a car quick, not ultimate hp numbers.
I noticed this when I ran a GHL 2.5" cat back with a high-flow cat on my old NA. Stock diameter is 2.25". The 951 runs a 2.5" and it's pushing quite a bit more power.
Old 08-06-2004, 04:46 PM
  #8  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I am still waiting for a dyno chart for an 8v 944 from SFR before I crack open my wallet. I want to see a gain in HP while retaining low end grunt. I am concerned that the the power band just shifts to the higher rpms.

I can't believe with all of the group buys and people extolling the virtues of the SFR exhaust there is not real data out there on functionality. All I hear is "sounds great" and "looks nice" when it comes to the 8v.
Old 08-06-2004, 05:11 PM
  #9  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You will not see much hp gain when in N/A trim...

however when flow becomes a larger factor the HP gains will increase and as far as looseing low end? I think you would have to remove the midpipes with something more free-flowing before you really started to see a loss because in reality cat-back makes very little diffrence in flow compared to midpipes.
Old 08-06-2004, 05:32 PM
  #10  
Dave951M
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dave951M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ken- you'll actually see more of a gain on a turbo car by going larger since it's forced induction. The back pressure in a na car helps with cylinder scavenging (insuring a fresh charge of fuel/air mix). The lower back pressure on a turbo allows the turbo to spool up faster and be more efficient in charging the cylinders. I'm running a test pipe and 3" "cat" back, only no cat, and I'm on boost a couple hundred rpm sooner than I used to be. Not to mention that with just the turbo and a free flow Dynamax muffler, it makes some really cool noises of the good kind.
Old 08-06-2004, 05:45 PM
  #11  
Ken D
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ken D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,056
Received 79 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Right Dave. I feel the stock 951 exhaust is designed very well and suits my needs just fine. I am however adding a testpipe for the reasons you stated above.
I actually went back to my stock exhaust on my old NA (kept the high-flow cat) because I didn't like the shift up the powerband.
Old 08-06-2004, 06:27 PM
  #12  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

testpipe + Catback = TurboBack
Old 08-06-2004, 11:51 PM
  #13  
pearldrum944
Drifting
 
pearldrum944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri Cities, WA
Posts: 3,053
Received 73 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

How expensive are SFR exhausts?
Old 08-07-2004, 12:22 AM
  #14  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I stopped even caring about hp gains for the n/a. I wont even take the time to put my custom made test pipe back on....

Youre not gonna get much out of it.

My advice is to keep the stock headers, get a test pipe, and then a nice flowmaster 50 muffler. It wont be expensive and will sound great. Just stay away from the bursch systems, i personally had a terrible time with mine.
Old 08-07-2004, 12:45 AM
  #15  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pearldrum944
How expensive are SFR exhausts?

http://www.speedforceracing.com/prod...tomexhaust.php

Catback for the n/a is $600. I dont know the exact price given, but two fairly large group buys for the SFR exhaust were held a few months ago now...i dont remember what each catback system came out too but it was a pretty large discount. If another was organized in maybe 2-3 months i would defenetley participate.


Quick Reply: Exhaust



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:10 PM.